It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Great, that didn't occur to me, you may be on to something, but now who would fund the war? Do you think we should bring everybody home? Personally I do, but we also have to protect our land, so I can't say if this would be harmful or helpful? See everyone fails to see the point that there is no simple solution. At least I would like to think if there were, it'd already have happened, but maybe I see the glass as half empty?
Originally posted by habfan1968
Change the govt. run school system to what exactly? all private schools, who is gonna educate the too many kids of the poor then? themselves?
Providing an education is not easy but it is being provided, how one chooses to utilize the opportunity is the real issue.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Great, that didn't occur to me, you may be on to something, but now who would fund the war? Do you think we should bring everybody home? Personally I do, but we also have to protect our land, so I can't say if this would be harmful or helpful? See everyone fails to see the point that there is no simple solution. At least I would like to think if there were, it'd already have happened, but maybe I see the glass as half empty?
Rats, the thing didn't save my edit. Basically, I'm a Libertarian, and I believe the War On (Iraq, Afghanistan, Drugs, Vietnam, Korea, etc.) are/were all unconstitutional, unjust, a waste of tax payers money, and a way for the super elite to line their pockets with our suffering by owning businesses that profited from the wars.
There was some economists (I forgot who, I'll try to find if you're really interested) who said that in 2008, if all income tax was completely stopped...the US would still bring in as much money as it did in 1995 (in which I believe we were 'at war' with Kosovo, and paid for that just fine). There are still plenty of taxes the Government reams us with. They don't need income tax. It's only used to feed the greedy at the top and for the Military Industrial Complex.
Remember, the super wealthy are not always evil (Bill Gates for example. He gives money away all the time, even though he gets taxed on everything from his stocks (50%), his business (50%+), and all the employees he has employed, and his home, jets etc.)
Also, congressman and senators and the like make I think well over 200k a year (not including insider trading and passing laws to help the companies they own stock in). I don't believe they're taxed on it either (though I could be mistaken). Your enemy is government, not joe blow who is getting reamed.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Originally posted by habfan1968
Change the govt. run school system to what exactly? all private schools, who is gonna educate the too many kids of the poor then? themselves?
Providing an education is not easy but it is being provided, how one chooses to utilize the opportunity is the real issue.
Is that why MacDonalds cheeseburgers are so expensive, since the Government doesn't run fast food? Oh wait! They have double cheeseburgers for under a BUCK! (Though I wouldn't eat it, :lol
It's called competition. Competition will let the market lower prices just above profit if need be. The more private schools there are, the lower the prices will go. And since this is education we're talking about, chances are the quality will go up, since parents want their children to be successful, and will choose schools based on that cross section (price v quality). Sure less expensive schools will have less quality, but I'm sure they'll be better than schools that are currently in the backwoods or in the hoods.
Originally posted by brainwrek
You just made an argument as for why poor families shouldnt reproduce. If they cant afford to properly house, feed, clothe, and educate their children, they shouldnt have them.
Good job.
Originally posted by koolerthanjesus
reply to post by dawnstar
And your alternative would be? Let things remain as they are. The systems are working so well let's not rock the boat. I'm not saying I have the answers. But we have a failed welfare system and a flawed educational system. I don't think we should be sitting on our hands letting government steer this ship.
Originally posted by habfan1968
I disagree, the poor will have to choose between paying for school or let's say some necessity and of course choose necessity, by passing the kids education. Private education costs about $10,000 a year here in Ontario for kids from kindergarten to grade 8 then increases from grades 9 - 12, competition would surely bring the price down, but to a level where it's affordable for the masses of poverty line families is not realistic. Say it was $3000 a year per child how many could afford it then?
Originally posted by ldyserenity
[snip]...to keep America from dying.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
[snip]
I am very interested in that article, and I do agree with the war as being useless, in part, I still am not sold on the idea that there was a true threat to America, but then again, if there was, then we must take action.
[/snip]
[snip]
I do beleive that if that article you quoted is right, then why aren't more people knocking at the whitehouse, screaming "STOP TAKING MY INCOME!!!!"???
[/snip]
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
Originally posted by ldyserenity
[snip]
I am very interested in that article, and I do agree with the war as being useless, in part, I still am not sold on the idea that there was a true threat to America, but then again, if there was, then we must take action.
[/snip]
[snip]
I do beleive that if that article you quoted is right, then why aren't more people knocking at the whitehouse, screaming "STOP TAKING MY INCOME!!!!"???
[/snip]
An article (not THE article, but a similar one): www.cato-at-liberty.org...
Basically,m the reason more people don't scream about it is...they don't know, don't care, or they enjoy the luxuries of the welfare state (whether on it, or benefiting from it).
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
reply to post by ldyserenity
Exactly. It's a catch 22. That's why, I believe this Governor is talking about those that do not want to help themselves, not hard working people like you, your children, or Doc Velocity. I don't mind unemployment (though I wish it was optional, so if you refused to pay, you'd be out on your ass [I'd refuse, and I wouldn't mind being out on my ass. I'm a survivalist]), it's the welfare state that needs changing. And there only one (albeit drastic) way to do it. and that's to pull the rug from under people's feet. As long as the wake-up call is big enough, people will get the message.