It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lillydale
So you would rather a Chinese corporation make decisions for out government than say...any AMERICAN?
Originally posted by Doc Velocity
Originally posted by Lillydale
So you would rather a Chinese corporation make decisions for out government than say...any AMERICAN?
Chinese corporations don't make decisions for our government.
When the Communist Chinese wanted to influence our elections, their military intelligence just handed the money to Bill Clinton, or their "Buddhist Monks" just handed the money to Al Gore.
The Communist Chinese have really great connections on the Left in America, they don't need to go through such legal channels as donating through a corporation.
— Doc Velocity
Originally posted by apacheman
Why won't the corporations demand a vote, too? If the corporations have a "right" to speech, why shouldn't they have right to vote, too, just as any other person does? Or perhaps they should have a seat in the Senate or House?
Originally posted by wiredamerican
and is it really treason committed by these judges, and can they really get put away for what i see as being a crime?
This is not treason. They are heroes.
Why?
Because they just stripped election funding from government control.
They gave more power to Corporations and Unions.
Corporations and Unions are made out of people.
This is more power to the people. And that is a good thing.
I find it confusing that people would rather have government control on election funding. I say let the people, fund it. And it is the people who make up the corporations and unions.
This is one step ahead toward a more perfect Union.
Originally posted by neo5842
I have posted this mainly because I dont understand how a judge can override a decision made by government. Does this happen in the states a lot? and is it legal? and is it really treason committed by these judges, and can they really get put away for what i see as being a crime? Not being in the US, i do find some some things that go on in the legal system there very confusing.
www.veteranstoday.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
After Socialism, Fascism combats the whole complex system of democratic ideology, and repudiates it, whether in its theoretical premises or in its practical application. Fascism denies that the majority, by the simple fact that it is a majority, can direct human society; it denies that numbers alone can govern by means of a periodical consultation, and it affirms the immutable, beneficial, and fruitful inequality of mankind, which can never be permanently leveled through the mere operation of a mechanical process such as universal suffrage....
...Fascism denies, in democracy, the absur[d] conventional untruth of political equality dressed out in the garb of collective irresponsibility, and the myth of "happiness" and indefinite progress....
...iven that the nineteenth century was the century of Socialism, of Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does not necessarily follow that the twentieth century must also be a century of Socialism, Liberalism and Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity remains, and it may rather be expected that this will be a century of authority...a century of Fascism. For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State....
Originally posted by ChrisCrikey
It took a few days but the right wingers on ATS finally got their talking points. I just want to know who you got them from. Where were you two days ago? Couldn't think for yourself, could you?
This was the correct decision. Without this only corporations owning mass media outlets would have a voice. - excerpt from Hemisphere post on 21-1-2010 @ 07:10 PM
Originally posted by Lillydale
Well I guess the right wanted a piece of that pie as well.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Why the rush?? Could it be the fear of a liberal justice appointee or maybe the NWO is moving into high gear?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Eurisko2012
The government is people, too, so your argument is sublimely ridiculous. Unfortunately, the government youj seem to dislike so much was mainly put in place by corporations, so be prepared for it to get much weaker and far worse.
Most corporatists are really closet royalists in drag: each thinks of himself as running an empire, none have any love of democracy or their fellow citizens, they much prefer subjects to equals. Each would far prefer a nationless world subject to their whims, like the Sultan of Brunei. Why do you think they support dictatorships so fervently?
Originally posted by wiredamerican
and is it really treason committed by these judges, and can they really get put away for what i see as being a crime?
This is not treason. They are heroes.
Why?
Because they just stripped election funding from government control.
They gave more power to Corporations and Unions.
Corporations and Unions are made out of people.
This is more power to the people. And that is a good thing.
I find it confusing that people would rather have government control on election funding. I say let the people, fund it. And it is the people who make up the corporations and unions.
This is one step ahead toward a more perfect Union.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Enjoy your delusion.