It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2010

page: 238
123
<< 235  236  237    239  240  241 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Me and my dad felt that one.

Was just a quick shake then went away.

47 km (29 miles) WSW (255°) from Brawley, CA


edit on 4-11-2010 by Oozii because: -




posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Perhaps it is System Noise

This from earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca...



Signals from the seismic stations make their way to EarthquakesCanada data centres via various electronic means. Essentially, each station has its own computer system that digitizes the data from its seismometer and transmits the digital data via one or more of satellite, terrestrial microwave, UHF radio, telephone modem, or the Internet. If any of the components in the system should fail, or become degraded by atmospheric or other disturbances, there will be a loss of signal or some form of noise introduced. The computer system at the station also calibrates itself whenever it is restarted, which can can generate a strange but easily recognized transient burst


That 2nd one looks like the drum has come off its axis.


you should screenshot it and send it to them and ask what it is

edit on 4-11-2010 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Well, I would definately be happy with that answer. It could very well be seeing as how all of the other ones I usually look at seem to be having issues....it just doesn't look like your typical 'noise', or does it?

I have to say though that I went out for a bike ride and all the wildlife seems to be acting perfectly normal. I would think that if a volcano were rumbling less than 50 miles away they would be a bit jittery..



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


Nothing to see here, move along please!

The sound files are here in the folder Sound Files > USA & Canada

Actually, just as I first said this is 'pipecleaner' type interference. I have put three files up there in my sound folder. They are UW_MBKE_ENZ_Snippet.mp3 which is a section that demonstrates the noise. The sample rate is 2000 Hz against the file rate of 100 Hz so it is 20x as fast, It is the section from the main file UW_MBKE_ENZ_20101104-000000_2000Hz.wav that starts at 35 minutes and runs for 10 minutes. In terms of the seismo this means according to my trust calculator wot I did writ that the sound begins at 20:40 UTC.

I have also included the UW_SBES_ENZ_20101104-000000_2000Hz.wav file. The two 13 Mb files are raw data - i.e just as output from the program.

I am just about to listen to the last one now but I don't expect it to be different.



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Yes it is system noise - just posted the files.

The second one looks like this as a plot and is a combination of pipecleaners, wind and earth tide, just like wot I did said!



Edit: Second pick comes from Audacity instead on my program but still shows the tide.


edit on 4/11/2010 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 


You are just too cool PM. Thanks!!

It almost sounds like whale songs underwater. Maybe some of that noise IS melt due to the wierd warm weather???

Either way...I can go back to my normal day.



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by westcoast
 


The whale sound noises - i.e. the softer lower noise in the background is the mountain singing - probably water - not the right frequency for harmonic tremor. There are the odd few micro-quakes as you would expect, but the whole thing is sort of drowned by the interference.

I love listening to these!! (Actually I never do it unless someone asks a question that needs the sound to clarify)



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 05:50 PM
link   
So, being that everyone appears to have abandon my Thread, I'll ask my question here.

We have a large eruption ongoing at Merapi. The scientist are anticipating a massive eruption. Accordingly - if we have a massive eruption, we have a loss of mass within the earth - a hollow so to speak which will need to fill. We have unstable plates that are trying to re-adjust. Thinking is - if we have a massive eruption - will the displacement of material cause another the plates to shift yet further - making them even more unstable or will it be a breaking point for them to snap - hence - very large quake



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   
Good day friends!

I see we have had another "world wide event". Wow. Can you say obtuse, thick as a brick, one sandwich short of a picnic basket?

Oh well, at least WE know what's happening. we do WE DO!



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Just don't say
"pic-a-nic" basket anymore...lol Got too many Jellystone connotations to it.....



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   
reply to post by freetree64
 


OK I won't. Thanks for that pic-a-nic image. BooBoo looks likes he's just felt a tremor. heheh.



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 06:05 PM
link   
reply to post by berkeleygal
 


Your welcome and yeah I noticed that...hehe

Thanks for all the updates and info, it really helps...



posted on Nov, 4 2010 @ 06:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


Hi Anmarie 96, I think no one is answering because it's hard to say. It does make sense all the activity will cause more though. That whole area seems to be very unstable. My thoughts and prayers are going out to all of our friends in Indonesia.
edit on 4-11-2010 by Tippys Dad because: correct speling



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 05:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Anmarie96
 


AM, thanks for mentioning your thread. Somehow I missed that one. It must have got pushed under all the November sky is falling threads. I will go read it now - it looks interesting.



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 06:01 AM
link   
* This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 5.0
Date-Time

* Friday, November 05, 2010 at 10:14:03 UTC
* Friday, November 05, 2010 at 07:14:03 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 35.974°N, 139.899°E
Depth 62.5 km (38.8 miles)
Region NEAR THE SOUTH COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances 35 km (20 miles) NNE of TOKYO, Japan
65 km (40 miles) NNE of Yokohama, Honshu, Japan
65 km (40 miles) S of Utsunomiya, Honshu, Japan
70 km (40 miles) SW of Mito, Honshu, Japan
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 13.4 km (8.3 miles); depth +/- 16.2 km (10.1 miles)
Parameters NST= 12, Nph= 12, Dmin=164.8 km, Rmss=0.96 sec, Gp=137°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2010dga6



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 06:32 AM
link   
Hi guys...theres this thread that just got posted now with a possible 8.7 quake......could you guys review it if you have some time to spare? would be great to find out if this one actually is really for real....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

regards,

ringht_n_wrong



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 07:38 AM
link   
Update time = Fri Nov 5 12:28:37 UTC 2010

MAG UTC DATE-TIME
y/m/d h:m:s LAT
deg LON
deg DEPTH
km Region
MAP 5.0 2010/11/05 12:13:51 7.026 126.798 173.3 MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES
MAP 4.7 2010/11/05 11:22:45 11.593 -86.339 67.3 NEAR THE COAST OF NICARAGUA
MAP 4.8 2010/11/05 11:14:57 51.589 178.647 35.0 RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 12:02 PM
link   
Quite a few responses to this wee quake - 2732
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Magnitude 3.7
Date-Time
* Friday, November 05, 2010 at 16:06:37 UTC
* Friday, November 05, 2010 at 09:06:37 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 33.778°N, 118.155°W
Depth 18.4 km (11.4 miles)
Region GREATER LOS ANGELES AREA, CALIFORNIA
Distances NEAR Long Beach, California
25 km (15 miles) W of Santa Ana, California
30 km (20 miles) WNW of Irvine, California
615 km (380 miles) SSE of SACRAMENTO, California
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.4 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 0.7 km (0.4 miles)
Parameters Nph= 81, Dmin=4 km, Rmss=0.21 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=6
Source * California Integrated Seismic Net:
* USGS Caltech CGS UCB UCSD UNR
Event ID ci10833357

earthquake.usgs.gov...
edit on 5-11-2010 by muzzy because: OMG LA is sliding into the Pacific Ocean




posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 01:09 PM
link   
Today’s Earthquake Fact
The hypocenter of an earthquake is the location beneath the Earth's surface where the rupture of the fault begins. The epicenter of an earthquake is the location directly above the hypocenter on the surface of the Earth.



posted on Nov, 5 2010 @ 01:56 PM
link   
Too small for USGS list but significant none the less, perhaps related to the 4.2 and 4.7 in the Balkans (Serbia quake)

GFZ Potsdam - Earthquake Bulletin
Region: Red Sea
Time: 2010-11-05 01:12:59.2 UTC
Magnitude: 4.2
Epicenter: 38.60°E 20.14°N
Depth: 10 km
Status: manually revised
geofon.gfz-potsdam.de...

confirmed by EMSC
Magnitude mb 4.2
Region RED SEA
Date time 2010-11-05 01:13:01.8 UTC
Location 20.16 N ; 38.65 E
Depth 30 km
Distances 158 km S Jiddah (pop 2,867,446 ; local time 04:13:01.8 2010-11-05)
161 km SW Bah'rah (pop 60,855 ; local time 04:13:01.8 2010-11-05)
www.emsc-csem.org...

More information at:
Saudi Geological Survey Jaddah, Saudi Arabia www.sgs.org.sa... but I can't get their site to open



new topics




 
123
<< 235  236  237    239  240  241 >>

log in

join