Norway spiral - Russia accepts blame even though Norway may have been responsible ! !, page 33
Pages: <<  30    31    32    33  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 284 times


reply posted on 12-2-2010 @ 10:44 AM by Phage
reply to post by ChrisM101


1. Ok, the schedule lies. Why even bring it up then? You only like the part that supports your side and disregard that which does not. A perfect conspiracy theorist.

2. HAARP does not have ELF or VLF transmitters. The HF frequency heater can be used to induce ELF radiation of very low strength in the ionosphere. This is one of the areas of research.

3. North Korea would be more interested in hitting any place they could; Seattle, Portland, San Francisco. What's the difference? But even if they tried for San Francisco, the path would lie 600 miles from Gakona, closer than the distance from EISCAT to the spiral.


reply posted on 12-2-2010 @ 05:03 PM by PhotonEffect
reply to post by ChrisM101



I would almost be willing to consider the possibility of two events having occurred simultaneously but then my logic and reasoning kick in...

If HAARP was being used as a missile defense system, as you're suggesting, against the Russian Bulava that day, then who tipped off HAARP as to the launch time?

Certainly it wasn't the Russians. And while they followed proper protocol of warning seafaring persons ahead of time to avoid the White Sea, they didn't specify an exact time of launch.

So this would have to mean that someone tipped off HAARP(or EISCAT I guess) as to the exact time when the rocket was to be launched that day so they would know when to aim their death ray at it...

Who would you suggest was the tipster?

A rogue Russian spy?
or maybe a stealthy EISCAT spy?

And are you to take the Russians as being so stupid as to not know when they're own test missile was shot down? Could you imagine the repercussions if they found out that some little EISCAT station in neighboring Norway was responsible for the "failure"

Why is it so hard to think logically about this stuff?

[edit on 12-2-2010 by PhotonEffect]



reply posted on 14-2-2010 @ 01:35 PM by davesidious
reply to post by PhotonEffect



Because it's not as much fun to pretend something bigger is going on. Especially if one has come to that conclusion before even bothering to read anything on the subject from experts.


reply posted on 15-2-2010 @ 11:45 AM by ChrisM101
reply to post by PhotonEffect



You know they do tell their neighboring governments and even more specifically the US so as to not initiate Global Thermo Nuclear War.
But the heater can and does operate for several hours at a time.

But more specifically we always have SSN's shadowing all of their current naval assets 24/7 though not at war. We were even in close proximity when the K-141 KURSK sank.


reply posted on 24-5-2011 @ 03:56 PM by waynor80
reply to post by Phage



You really need to look at this article. It addresses all of your concerns and questions. The evidence is there, and it is presented veraciously, with charts, images, scientific data - all of it is here. I found it very helpful, myself. Hope you do too:

www.enterprisemission.com...
Pages: <<  30    31    32    33  >>    ^^TOP^^



Starship Enterprise could be a reality by 2032, engineer says
  Posted 14 days ago with 77 member flags
TV Networks Say You\'re Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Schoolboy \'genius\' solves puzzles posed by Sir Isaac Newton
  Posted 2 days ago with 21 member flags
I want to build a free energy generator! Suggestions?
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags
World’s longest-running experiment now with webcam
  Posted 15 days ago with 19 member flags
Bye Bye Co2 and global warming
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Big Oil Vs. Plasma Battery Technology - Guess who is winning?
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags