You dont even find it a little odd this would happen right before the president was to accept a prize for peace basically right under were it happened. Have you ever seen anything like this before? and if your answer is no then add the president factor into it and you get, come on work with me here. Its like playing poker with my sisters kids or something.

There are many errors in your calculations and images. Your assumptions are very wrong.

It was just a failed launch, and it has happened before. Oddly enough, people thought the last spirals were a wormhole too... History truly repeats itself.

Originally posted by tauristercus
Looking at the following image, the nominal flight path of the Bulava missile when launched from the White Sea area would have placed it almost immediately on a north-east trajectory, following a great circle route to it's intended impact point in the Kamchatka penninsula, approximately 5,500 kms distant.
And yet for the missile to be so clearly visible in the Norwegian sky, implies that the missiles guidance system must have almost immediately failed and changed it's path to a north-westerly direction, almost a 90 degree shift in direction ... and headed instead towards Norway !


Based on the following image, it is clear that if the spiral was the result of a failed missile test and was visible from Norway, then it should also have been clearly visible from both Sweden and Finland which both would have been within the missiles flight trajectory - yet corroborating eye witness reports from either of these countries is almost non-existent. Virtually every report and image originates from Norway alone, implying that the spiral display (irrespective of the source) must have occurred at a very low altitude if only visible from Norway.

...

It also implies that the missile never reached any appreciable altitude otherwise the spiral effect would have been visible over a vast geographical area and not just Norway.

First and foremost...You forgot to calculate Earths rotation. Earth rotates towards the East, so the flight path is not straight, it is curved. So shortly after launch the Earth rotated, and that put Norway in a perfect position to view the back end of the missile. The back end is what was caught on camera in order to get the perfect spiral effect.

The "spiral" was only really visible in Norway because of their position and perspective of the back end of the missile (it was a unique perspective). However other places could see the missile launch, they didn't see it as a "spiral" because they saw it from the side. It's like a corkscrew, from the back end a corkscrew looks like a circle, but from the side it looks like an up and down wave.

So to other places there was no "spiral", just another missile launch trail. The spiral was unique to only places parallel with the back end of the missile.

Originally posted by tauristercus
We are now being told that this particular Bulava test failed because of problems associated with the third stage burn. Now this implies that until the 3rd stage problems, that the 1st and 2nd stages completed their burns nominally which should have lifted the Bulava to an altitude of at least 500 kms.

I am not sure how accurate that statement of 500 kms in 2nd stage is, but lets work with that... I will use that later. *

Originally posted by tauristercus
The immediate question to be asked is why the missile was allowed to complete a 1st and 2nd stage burn and not terminated immediately a deviation was noticed ...

You only arrived at this idea above because you immediately assumed there was a deviation after failing to include Earths rotation into your calculations. The missile didn't fail until Stage 3. So your assumptions caused your errors.

Originally posted by tauristercus
Now lets take a look at whats been stated to be proof of a Russian missile launch on that day ... namely the visible exhaust trail.

Yes, the exhaust trail pretty much proves it was a missile launch. Case closed.

Originally posted by tauristercus
In the following images, you can clearly see on the horizon what appears to be an exhaust trail and has been taken as evidence of a missile launch ... in this case the launch of a Bulava missile on 9 December.

Now take a look at the following image that illustrates the "distance to the horizon" calculation.

For someone of average height standing at sea level, the distance to the horizon is approximately 5 kms.

Let's use the above calculation and rearrange it so that instead of determining the distance to the horizon, we use it instead to calculate the height.

Now, the distance from Tromso, Norway to the White Sea is approximately 800 kms. Plugging this value into the rearranged equation tells us that to be able to see the "exhaust plume" created at the White Sea from a distance of 800 kms, that the height of the plume will need to extend an incredible 40 kms into the upper atmosphere. If that wasn't bad enough, to be able to visually see that plume, it would imply that the exhaust plume had a width in excess of 10 kilometres !!

* If you remember earlier you said Stage 2 reaches a height of 500 kms.... now you state that the plume would have to be only 40 kms to be visible in those pictures. So I don't really see any problem with that?

The white plume trail below the blue cloud is all 1st and 2nd stages. So you can assume that the top of the plume is near 500 kms. That makes it perfectly high enough to be visible from Norway.

Originally posted by tauristercus
A height of 40 kms and a width greater than 10 kms ... all from the launch of a single missile ... thats equivalent to the exhaust plume from a shuttle launched in Cape Canaveral being seen 800 kms away in North Carolina ... somehow I don't think so !!!!

Plumes expand. Not only because of the pressure of the exhaust, but because it heats the surrounding air, and it creates turbulence... The plume from a missile could expand to many times the size of the missile.

Just look at the shuttle, it's plume expands to many time more the size of the shuttle itself.

None of your calculations mean anything. If anything it supports the missile visible from Norway theory.

Also, the shuttle launch can be visible from most of the East Coast. That includes North Carolina. You should read up on that.

Originally posted by tauristercus
So, as has been shown, it doesn't take much analysis to arrive at the conclusion that whatever was responsible for the spiral effect above Norway, it could NOT have been the result of a failed Russian missile test ending in a spectacular fashion in the airspace above Norway.

Very wrong. Your initial assumption lead you astray, and the rest of your calculations followed your incorrect direction.

You entire topic is pretty much bunk. Don't take it personal though.

Outstanding work indeed.....

Extremely plausible explination if ever I have read one on here about any given subject...

S&F

I do believe it was a rocket, but I don't believe that it was launched in the white sea by the russians.

It is clearly a rocket when you see the exhaust plume, but obviously it wasn't launched from where the official story says it was

Perhaps the rocket did work? perhaps the spiral feature is stage 3? Also, perhaps it is used in conjunction with EISCAT? For what, I have no idea.

It is possible the rockets spread something which increases EISCAT's effectiveness? (or some other uses together).

Anyway, in summary, I agree it was a rocket. The rest of the official story smells fishy, though.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
If you remember earlier you said Stage 2 reaches a height of 500 kms.... now you state that the plume would have to be only 40 kms to be visible in those pictures. So I don't really see any problem with that?

The white plume trail below the blue cloud is all 1st and 2nd stages. So you can assume that the top of the plume is near 500 kms. That makes it perfectly high enough to be visible from Norway.

I'm not the OP but I will reply to you anyway.

You do realise the exhaust plume is only stage one of the rocket, right? The exhaust plume would not extend to 500 KMs. The blue in the photo is stage two. The spiral is stage 3.

First of all great analysis! S&F

OK I agree that it didnt originate from Russia and it started in Russia, but I have the feeling that we shouldn't focus on a solitairy government. It is not Russia or Norway alone that is responsible. As far as I know Haarp is located round the pole on different continents and has nothing to do with the man made-up borders, and so, if you ask my, with the governments of the people. I hate to use this term, but could it be an experiment of the NWO?

I have to leave for a couple of hours but when I get the chance to read I will.

S&F

I initially thought this was to do with a HAARP site located in the area,but after reading about the missile believed it to be that,interesting maybe it is something interesting!

I agree with ALLinONE's points,because it was not seen from sweden or norway does not mean it couldn't have been seen.would be interesting to see what the new results show with earth rotation taken into account