Norway spiral - Russia accepts blame even though Norway may have been responsible ! !, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 283 times


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:01 AM by Krusty the Klown
reply to post by tauristercus



Well done.

Good use of logic and facts.

I had not heard of this other HAARP facility before.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:21 AM by Point of No Return
reply to post by DGFenrir



And what does the explosion of a hydrogen bomb have to do with an alleged missile that wasn't even carrying a nuclear payload?

Blatant attempt at derailing and disinfo, imo.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:24 AM by Point of No Return
reply to post by DraconianKing



Could you point out these errors and provide evidence to debunk them.

Yet another blatant attempt at derailing.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:29 AM by Raider of Truth
reply to post by tauristercus



Very informative!
Extremely well researched, so EISCAT may be to blame...i guess the test was a success then as it drew millions of people's attentions throughout Europe

S&F will re-read when i get back from college later today.



reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:33 AM by DGFenrir
Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to
post by DGFenrir



And what does the explosion of a hydrogen bomb have to do with an alleged missile that wasn't even carrying a nuclear payload?

Blatant attempt at derailing and disinfo, imo.


The maximum height of the explosion was 10km. Now go see where it was detonated.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 02:39 AM by valiant
reply to post by DraconianKing



Maybe you should of posted your views on the errors and poor assumptions, rather than making a post saying you can see them and can explain the basic physics to a chimp, which I highly doubt myself but you know, that's just me.

Good post op star and flag, though i'm still on the fence myself at the moment.



[edit on 14-12-2009 by valiant]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^