Very cool....I'm watching the video now.

Mark is turning into our very own investigative journalist.......

What have you got planned for the future?

-Dev

About 10,000 people died of the H1N1 virus this year.
Typically, 30,000 people die each year from seasonal flu.

Wow, good job mark! I only had time to watch the first part, which needless to say leaves me on the edge of my seat. Look forward to watching the rest and keep up the good work!

I hope to see a ton more of these kind of interviews.

Any "Science and Technology" interviews planned? I think everyone here would love to get an ear in on CERN and the LHC... Just an idea...

[edit on 11-12-2009 by DaMod]

Originally posted by DaMod
Any "Science and Technology" interviews planned?

We have some rather significant plans. This video is our first serious attempt with our "video field kit" which is essentially a very-small 1080HD camera with several audio options including a portable on-camera mic-mixer and wireless microphones. It's highly portable and all fits in a rather small over-the-shoulder bag, smaller than most laptop bags.

In the coming months there will be many more interviews with UFO researchers, paranormal experts, scientists, and more. So stay tuned.

WOW
Thanks so much for that interview.


Looking forward to what comes next from you guys.

I only watched a part of the first video and I can tell that this is going to be absolutely awesome. I am not able to watch any further but rest assured I will be watching this whole thing very soon. Great Great Great job guys! I will be back with a more pertinent post later.

It's great to hear the other side of the coin, as it were - especially from someone who is able to back up what they are saying with (we trust) solid evidence.

Material of this quality will undoubtedly contribute hugely to the goal of denying ignorance and facilitating well-informed discussion.

I have only had a chance to view the first video, but - with no disrespect intended to a man of Dr. Green's stature - I would like to very briefly raise what appeared to me a significant hole in his line of argument, namely that those who work for Baxter are, a priori, neither intelligent enough or evil enough to pull off a nefarious conspiracy. I am certainly not saying that they have engaged in something of this nature, rather simply pointing out that Dr. Green's counterargument, which consisted of nothing more than "I don't believe..." does little to counter suspicion, especially in the light of the way he openly admitted that theories relating to the role of this particular pharmaceutical company are, relatively speaking, not without some merit.

My point is this: he firstly stated that those who work in this area are dealing with something more complex than nuclear physics. If anything, this serves to emphasize how extremely intelligent these people are, inasmuch as they not only understand the field in a general way, but are actively engaged in/ dealing with cutting-edge research, not to mention constantly exploring the possibilities for the manipulation and exploitation of microbiological systems. The reply has to be: if anyone is intelligent enough - they are.

As to the degree of evil that might be involved I don't think serious debate is centred around caricatures of mad/evil scientists out to destroy the world driven by sheer hatred, etc. But there is widespread mistrust of corporations that have the ability to effectively lobby governments to adopt policies that send truly cast amounts of tax-payers money their way - given the right set of circumstances (such as a virulent and deadly virus threatening entire populations). A lot of people are awake to the fact that there are people who are led more by financial gain than by conscience, and that such people do, from time to time, gain positions of influence, both within corporations and governments.

Dr Green's argument on this issue has, therefore, done little to allay concerns of the possibility that pharmaceutical companies may actually be manipulating data and/or vaccines to their own ends.

From part one I get the feeling that the public is being left in the dark and fed crap purposely. At the end the Baxter case was referred to as a conspiracy of stupidity. You mean to tell me that the public relations people involved with such a large pharmaceutical company are ignorant of this concern people have? They encourage it.

In part two, when asked if he or his family has been vaccinated he comes right out and says that he has not been vaccinated because it would be unethical for him to reserve such a scarce vaccine for himself because he is not in the at risk population.

He then says that he has been pretty strict with his family and friends and patients about following the rules about the at risk population. He never says that yes his family has been vaccinated. He only says that he has been strict about the rules.

I don't know about this guy. He is very good in this interview thus far.

Originally posted by Springer
PLEASE do forgive my amateurish ways, I've been a businessman my whole life, this "interviewer thing is brand new to me.

Get outta here! You and Bill have done a GREAT job and are two of the main reasons I keep coming back to ATS again and again.

Excellent interviews! Very informative! Thanks again for all you do. I look forward to the future projects!

(Still listening)

[edit on 11-12-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]

From part three I see that he would like to see real whistle blowers come out from behind their avatars more or less. Particularly with regards to the H1N1 stuff. Am I being too conspiratorial? Probably.

I absolutely loved this piece gentlemen. Thank you for this and I really look forward to more. I am going to send links to everyone I can think of. Thank you again!