Wow, do I ever have some comments.
First, the line of questioning from Springer was very direct and concise. I commend the staff for the quality presented in the interview. Again, great
I'm going to stick to a specific area of Dr. Green's responses even though many things stood out from his answers.
When he says he is a "strict supporter of the vaccination rules"; it means he promotes the CDC and WHO recommendations regarding vaccination,
With that cleared up, what really surprised me is that he went on to actively promote the nasal mist version of the vaccine for children and pregnant
woman; adding in the recommended point of double vaccination 28 days apart.
My comments to follow deal with the little known facts regarding that specific version of vaccine.
The nasal mist is a LIVE vaccine, the first ever live vaccine licensed for flu/influenza vaccination.
That version of vaccine is called "attenuated", meaning a live virus with reduced strength. This is also suppose
to mean that the live
virus, within the vaccine, is NOT pathogenic (or spreadable amongst the population).
The information in the following video clearly outlines (in the PATENT) that the outcome and results of the LIVE virus application, to be used in the
nasal mist, are UNKNOWN AND NOT PREDICTABLE
To top this off, the video shows the inventor of the LIVE vaccine version is none other than CFR member, Dr. Peter Palese.
The implicit financial involvement of a completely NEW vaccine application approved ONE year prior to any pandemic showing up whatsoever, is the slice
of conspiracy I'm focusing on here.
Remember, Dr. Kit Green is actively advocating use of this essentially unpredictable version of LIVE vaccine.
That's one of the reasons I don't "trust" Kit Green's version of events.
This 5 min video deals with the verifiable FACTS Springer's first question, in video three, was referring to.
(click to open player in new window)
The only other comment I'll mention has to do with the manner in which he dealt with public concerns of adverse side effects. All I'll say is that
since when does a resultant side effect from an injection have to appear within some short time-frame immediately following said injection?
Those of us that are legitimately concerned about side effects are concerned about the possible promotion of future chronic diseases that may
eventually result. You know, the types of conditions that puts an individual on prescription medication for the rest of their "natural" lives?
Who's to say that onset instances of MS, rheumatoid arthritis or any other chronic condition have to be physically measurable immediately following
an individual's vaccination?
When Merck's senior and chief vaccine expert, Dr. Maurice Hilleman came out and admitted that millions of polio vaccine doses where infected with
cancer causing SV40, did the population suddenly fall ill with cancer? No, the cancer epidemic played out over the course of many years, affecting
large numbers of people in many ways.
But apparently we are to believe that unless physical reactions are immediate, they are unequivocally unrelated.
My point is, there is a reason all instances of chronic disease are on the rise. And that it isnt' a coincidence that the monetary value of the
prescription medications involved with these conditions are astronomical.
Kit Green affirming that the industry (pharmaceutical industry) is "too stupid" and "not evil enough" means nothing in the face of these facts.