The Left/Right Paradigm (Summed Up)

ha i almost fell for the troll's


gotta love the edit button

[edit on 12/10/2009 by Alaskan Man]

reply to post by winston37


Well, this is what i am talking about ..


.. You cannot have an UNIFIED POLITICAL IDEOLOGY/PARTY .. people have different opinions...

[edit on 10-12-2009 by Polynomial C]

The left/right paradigm is designed to create a false division among the people of the United States in order to distract them from the real truth that they are owned by the Bank of International Settlements.

Classic technique, divide and conquer.

The Bank of International Settlements basically purchased the US, or should I say it facilitates and oversees the bankruptcy of our government through the Department of Treasury, which is not in any way controlled by the US Government.
The only actual power that the Federal Government has concerning the Department of Treasury is the power of appointment. A power that is currently given to every President of this corporation known as the US Government.
This government coup officially happened in 1933 with the implementation of the Emergency Banking Act, but the Department of Treasury became independent of the US Government, aka no oversight, in 1921. I believe that I am correct on the years.
This coup was several years in the making. Different people will point to different dates, but 1933 was a hallmark year for TPTB.
The Federal Government/Reserve, which is not our country by the way, then proceeded to round up all of the gold held by every citizen in the US and then forcibly exchange it for paper, because at that time we were, and currently still are, in bankruptcy.
A bankruptcy overseen by the Department of Treasury.
The reason for the Great Depression was not necessarily the drunken spending spree that happened when Joe citizen was allowed to wildly speculate with ridiculous amounts of unsecured credit on the stock market, that was a part of it, but another equally, if not more substantial reason that the Great Depression happened was the massive deflation that the Federal Reserve imposed due of the falling value of the dollar.
Remember guys, the dollar was based on gold back then and when foreign countries that had reserve/contract dollars caught wind of what was going on, then they, mainly France, wanted to cash in their dollars for gold.
It was not necessarily the run on the banks here in the states that caused our economy to crash, but it was the bank run combined with the unsustainable government contracts that was allowed to occur with the creation of the Federal Reserve.
The US government, aka congress, initially went on a wild spending spree with the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. Government contracts with other countries were, at the time, to be paid in gold. Gold was the basis for our then fiduciary currency. When these contracts came time to pay, and also the people in this country wanted gold instead of paper...
Then the economy crashed.
Congress has sold our arses out folks!!!!!
We were fine until ludicrous amounts of fractional reserve lending and a fiat currency based on taxation. Anyways....
So, in steps the Bank of International Settlements.
The Federal Government forcibly takes all of the gold, and it becomes collateral for the endless amount of credit that the international banksters supply to the Federal Government.
Thus, the dollar is saved and WWII can begin, but that is another story...
So how does this fit into this thread you might ask?

Arundhati Roy summed it up best when she said:

"So, underneath the shrill exchange of insults, there is almost absolute consensus... It's not a real choice. It's an apparent choice. Like choosing a brand of detergent. Whether you buy Ivory Snow or Tide, they're both owned by Proctor & Gamble."

"This doesn't mean that one takes a position that is without nuance... that the Democrats and Republicans are the same. Of course, they're not. Neither are Tide and Ivory Snow. Tide has oxy-boosting and Ivory Snow is a gentle cleanser."

We have all been paid for and our handlers are either Democrat or Republican.
They are the managers for the company that owns us.
We do not live in a country, but we are born into employment, for a corporation owned by a very few international families.
It sucks. I know.

Originally posted by Polynomial C
reply to post by winston37

 

Well, this is what i am talking about ..


.. You cannot have an UNIFIED POLITICAL IDEOLOGY/PARTY .. people have different opinions...

[edit on 10-12-2009 by Polynomial C]

Agreed on that. But the two party system we have today is very close to what you claim is impossible...but most people can't see it. They are two sides of the same coin. The sooner more people realize that, the sooner we can begin to have some rational discussion about how to deal with our differences in opinion.

Genesis 3 verse 22:

Behold, the man has become as one of us to know what is good and evil.


In the beginning there was no time, no good and evil, just the NOW.

All this right and wrong is making us either nutty or severely asleep and oblivious to reality.

I read either on this forum or on a gun forum a few weeks ago, this explained as 'Democrats grow the size and power of government through social justice...Republicans grow the size and power of government through security'

When I hear a left and right argument, I think of LOONY LIBERALS and CRAZY CONSERVATIVES.

Now Don't get me wrong, I'm for liberal ideals such as mass transit and some welfare programs, but I'm also for some conservatives ideals such as limited government. But My mind was made up after getting to know some people on SSI. There Crazy, and if they can't get there meds through Uncle Sam, well were in trouble.

Anyway, I vote for the Amtrak supporter.

P.S.
Love the thread.

Originally posted by AnonymousMoose
I read either on this forum or on a gun forum a few weeks ago, this explained as 'Democrats grow the size and power of government through social justice...Republicans grow the size and power of government through security'

Actually I found out that Republicans outsource government to the private sector while Democrats create more bureaucracy.

reply to post by Alaskan Man
Excellent post.

Made my day.............and one picture is worth a thousand words!

Wish I could give you more than one star for that one.

It is easy to tell apart those bloggers here who are sheep themselves while considering others to be such. Simply those who aren`t sheep voted for Ron Paul.

reply to post by Alaskan Man


First time poster but long time reader! Great post, both (All) sides owned by 'the powers that be'! Democrats, Republian, Consevative, Labour, Liberal Demorcrats, Communist, Socialists, Facists!

WAKE UP EVERYONE! It's time for the programmed robots to reprogramme themselves and rebel! HiiiiYaaa

Well you know what they will do if too many people wake up to this,just create a third option


How dare you call me a cow!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The link above contains the verbal equivalent to the original picture posted.
It does little for us to argue and fight with eachother as we ALL walk into the wood chipper together. It does provide entertainment though for those who believe they own us. Let the revolution begin.

[edit on 11-12-2009 by HappilyEverAfter]

I have always associated myself with the left because those dude seem to establish policies I can agree with or support. I've called myself a liberal since I was 10 but I don't want to think it's just me following a party blindly into the dark.

This thread had got me thinking that I will shed this title I give myself, and simply say that my political stance on issues is what I think is right, not which answer is democrat or republican


gotta admit, though, republican/conservative people have often been associated with pretty terrible things (see my thread "David Shartlet Finds Connection Between The Family and Uganda's Gay Laws for one example)

Sometimes photo's seem to do the job.

What I laugh at now is the fact these people we elected are finally wising up to the fact we are tired of being robbed blind and we are watching.

They know we are watching and seem to change there opinions when we stand together they don't want to lose their jobs and all the goodies they get and/or take.

I noticed that when they go to pass a bill or something if there is no gripe from we the people it passes. When we don't like it and speak out they pretend to care and talk about it a little longer to make it look good then they pass it later anyhow...... usually when they can get peoples attention on something else.

Like you said left, right, Rep, Dem. why is it always one pitted against the other, why is society programmed like this.

Can we change but change for the good and just do what is the right thing to do for one another, I don't think so because most just always want to be right so the fights continue.

Gerald Celente was right when he once said "it's like pro wrestling"- they're putting up this show as if there is some great animosity between them (Republicans / Democrats) but behind closed doors they will have a good laugh at us while drinking champagne, together. Most importantly these people are in the very same secret societies, it makes no difference who wins elections. For example just look at Skull & Bones... there we got John Kerry and George W. Bush --- the real controllers couldn't care less as to who is in power, they have won anyway.

Of course not the greatest example, as people tend to downplay the importance of Skull & Bones, but I just want to illustrate the camaraderie between oh-so "different" politicians... and this is just Skull & Bones, think of the even deeper amity between fellow freemasons or even secret societies we don't even know of- Anyway, the politicians you see on TV are just up there mostly for show- there are highly influential families (understatement), who have real control and who couldn't care less about Republicans or Democrats- As for who wields real power... It's all in the books, it's been out there for decades. Please educate yourself.

C. Wright Mills - The Power Elite (1956)
The Invisible Government (1962)
Carroll Quigley - Tragedy and Hope (1966) (!!)

from a spirituality point of view;
this also ties into my belief in the way free choice works spiritually or metaphysically.
the 'truths' of divine intervention, free choice, and fate or predestination are all true.
the reason this can be so and not contradict itself is illustrated in that nice cartoon up there.
we believe we have free choice because we do, but predestination is also true because something Greater already knows which 'choice' we are going to make. its obviously more complicated than just 2 options but that's still my take on it too. let me know your thoughts.
makes sense to me.

Originally posted by Alaskan Man
I could give you a very long explanation, pointing out all the similarities, but sometimes its just easier to get your point across with a photo.

While everyone bickers about left this, or right that, Democrat this, Republican That we still keep walking in the same direction, with the same policy's.

[edit on 12/10/2009 by Alaskan Man]

This thread does not explain the Left/Right Paradigm.
It only shows the how of it. Not the why of it.
And there is a middle Paradigm, the Libertarian, going down the same path.

All I know is that if karma exists, the elites wont like their future.

That drawing is a perfect example of the truth. The left and the right are only distractions that keep the masses occupied while the one's who represent both sides do as they wish. The more people wake up though, the less power they have.