Originally posted by ROBL240
In response the Armed Unit took no chances and took the guy down with a fatal shot, a sad case of paranoia in todays age where its shoot first and ask
questions later.
Well what would you do? If you are being told by several people that someone has a gun and you arrive on the scene and see a gun, are you going to
take the time to contemplate whether it is real or not?
Better yet, say you own a gun and someone comes into your house with a gun and points it at you. Can you really and truly say with confidence that
your instinctive reaction would not be to fire immediately? Do you really think you, if put in that situation, would 'ask questions first' to see if
the gun was real?
If presented with a threat like that, all thought goes out the window because there is simply no time. That's what instinct is. And when presented
with a potentially life threatening situation, SURVIVAL instinct kicks in, which causes even more drastic responses.
Its easy for us to sit here and analyze what happened after the fact, but until we are in that situation with the adrenaline, the fear, and the
uncertainty, all fueling our instinctive response to any sudden movement by anyone involved, we cannot rightfully judge what happened unless the force
used was so blatantly excessive that it cannot be ignored. In that particular case, however, it was not.
As for this news article, yes it is a knee-jerk reaction and yes it is excessive, but to compare it to that particular incident is unfair and
incorrect.