It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Right, they need ten thousand pages to explain something that is not terribly complicated to begin with.
I am not going to say they got everything wrong because that would be false but why the need for an entire tome, probably larger than encyclopedia britanica?
Could the objective be TO CONFUSE rather than inform? Besides all it takes is one or two major errors to make the entire report IRRELLAVENT!
Self explanatory, you don't even need to be an engineer to understand this.
The planes crashed in the mid to upper levels of each respective tower, which means columns and truces below that level should not be affected at all.
Yes there was an uncontrollable fire raging for about an hour burning jet fuel and office furniture, but the damage would be LIMITED LOCALLY and only that section would collapse.
Originally posted by TrueTruth
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
Of course I've heard of it.
But 2 things:
First of all, he's talking about me. He started this thread, because he got all mad at me in a different thread, where I essentially used his own source to debunk his own point.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by TrueTruth
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
Of course I've heard of it.
But 2 things:
First of all, he's talking about me. He started this thread, because he got all mad at me in a different thread, where I essentially used his own source to debunk his own point.
Don't flatter yourself. This thread has absolutely nothing to do with you or your so-called "debunking" of the dancing Israelis involvement in 9/11. For some bizarre and inexplicable reason, you can't stand the thought that Israel and Mossad had anything to do with 9/11, despite significant evidence to the contrary and statements from arresting New Jersey police detectives.
But that's your problem, not mine.
Originally posted by RipCurl
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Right, they need ten thousand pages to explain something that is not terribly complicated to begin with.
Proves that you've never read it or had any education in engineering and/or architecture.
If it were that simple, could you provide in your own words, exactly what happened.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Otherwise, you're telling all these engineers that their years of education in college and graduate school was all a waste, if someone who doesn't have a an education can simply wave it all away and say "it wasn't that complicated".
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
The NIST report wasn't just to explain what happene,d IT ALSO provided ADVICE to future engineers and construction and architecturers of steps to make sure FUTURE buildings can be further protected should an incident LIKE the WTC towers happen again.
Originally posted by RipCurl
Which didn't answer my question. Shows that you dont understand the construction of the towers and FAILURE to understsand high school physics. YOU need a lateral force to cause a "lean" to happen.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I just did! If you disagree with my opinion(s) that is a different issue but I fail to see why I need to keep repeating myself. Either take it or leave it.
There are many engineers that agree with my hypothesis so clearly there must be merit. Are you calling them crazy?
Indeed, its more of a future reference than an actual investigation into what exactly brought down the towers, at least thats what I think. Feel free to disagree all you want...
irrelavant to the events on 9/11. What does past deeds by past governemtns have to do with a report on the collapse of the towers.
And yes governments have been known to cover-up ferry disasters, airline disasters, building collapses, etc in the past.
The lateral force was created from the frame's inability to evenly support the towers weight, thus causing a leaning effect to the weak side. In turn that would cause a dislodge.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by RipCurl
See architects and engineers for 9-11 truth!
Also I would appreciate if you stop insulting me.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Hey RipCurl, have you seen this short compilation of news stories from 9/11? I can't get jthomas to comment on it. Tell me, where did these "secondary explosions" come from? How about the "bomb in the building" that the FDNY firefighter is referring to? And why did 1500-degree fires burn for months in the WTC sublevels, despite a "lake full of water" being poured on them?
Originally posted by mikelee
he OS is obvisouly flawed and that is a fact stated by not only "conspiracy theorists" but the sentiments of Congressmen, Senators, Architects and other professionals as well.
....Anyone in my opinion who cannot accept that fact then move on to investigate other, more notable inconsistancies within the OS is simply in the way of everyone else trying to perform legitimate investigation into this national tragedy.