It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, I don't think you're an extremist at all. I'm just stating what others have asked. Where does does it end?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
reply to post by JoshNorton
Think you might have gone a bit overboard there but number one was ok.
A+ for you
You are a friendly bunch after all
Edit: Rubbish attempt by the way to make me out to be some mental extremist.
[edit on 7-1-2010 by Bunker or Bust]
Yes. It's called a cabinet, and it's generally created every 4 to 8 years.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
So if I became President and formed a group of unknown purpose (private / secret group) with restrictive membership and invited all my group members into senior roles with no justification to you the voter what so ever that would be ok?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
So if I became President and formed a group of unknown purpose (private / secret group) with restrictive membership and invited all my group members into senior roles with no justification to you the voter what so ever that would be ok? We would also have strong ties ("friends") in big business and maybe even direct involvement whilst holding a civic role. I certainly hope that sounds unacceptable to you but sadly that is what we have and it is abused alot.
membership is not restricted in theory and those group members can be removed by the populas so it's not the same by any stretch of the imagination.
I think society has a right to know more about those people than the John Doe living down the street.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
reply to post by KSigMason
Private? Not when the public pay your salary, ask Bill Clinton.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
You have the freedom not too do it as well, no-one is forcing you to do it.
Ever applied for a job and part of that job requirement is you have a medical done once a year? Maybe a pilot? Why? Safety.. If you don't want a medical being performed then you can't take the job! Same is it not?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
US Solider, bet you were forced to take your anti biological warfare meds and your "history" will have been checked in detail at enlistment. Uncle Sam knows everything about you make no mistake, otherwise you would have had terrorists infiltrate on mass! Job requirement..
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
So yes I do feel that a civic role either political or legal should have a job requirement to not be a member of such a group, if nothing else but to remove the risk of recriminations and a conflict of interest being arised.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Why do you think people care about Freemasons in such roles? Honestly why do you think a lot of people think there is a problem?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Because the bad stuff does happen, not exclusive to Freemasonary members I know but you can perform risk mitigation and being a Freemason should NOT be a job requirement. In some circles shall we say it can help..
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
"Freemasonry even teaches moderation and good conduct, never allowing our passions, our prejudices, or our interests to betray us."
Re-read your posts and stop to think how someone else might read it, a bit passionate maybe..
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Read through the whole thread, see how moderate and well mannered Masons react to constructive questioning (certainly on my part). Now tell me that if someone "crosses" a local group that no malice would be held to someone living in that area when terms such as retard are used and without apology..
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Oh by the way most run local business in the area, police, legal, medical, banks etc etc etc. Guess it's ok if your on the inside.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
So anything goes for you guys then, NO restrictions on what you can and can't do, your privacy is total regardless, even if bad elements hide behind that? So everyone is free to keep everything private totally.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
In the REAL world you are monitored on CCTV as a simple example, what choice do you have over that? NONE. Oh but that's ok if your not doing anything wrong, the EXACT same applies to my point.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
You can't seem to address in house bad apples, or won't. No response to that at all, strange that. But not really considering the mentallity behind alot of the replies, not all but a fair amount.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
And you feel that as a collective group doing "good" is your given right and everyone else can take a jump. Because you know best?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Good is based on perspective, what's good for you or "Masons" might not be good for everyone else which I might add is the MAJORITY of society. But screw it that's ok, can't stop you because your totally free and can keep hidden.
Gotcha
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
And now me suggesting and trying to debate that there should be some checks and balances which are representative of the significant MAJORITY and some of the concerns I am likened to a Stasi, whilst floating around in my "Goebbelian depths"? How dare you!!! Won't drop to your level, pathetic.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
What about my right to choose by whom I am Judged? You better than me? You seem to think you are..
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
At what point did I provide a 100 point list of who cannot do such a role? Not my place to say, I am supposed to be talking to moderate and well mannered Mason's about a specific topic which relates to them not the Knights of whatever but hey drag in everything including the kitchen sink to avoid the debate.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Very sad that you use the same tactic's time and time again. This is not an objective debate, waste of time.
Keep starring yourselves! Good work
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
So now it is suggested I am a criminal? Ever heard of civil law? With the level of defamation thrown around you might hear about it soon if you carry on that way.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
"What about my right to choose by whom I am Judged? You better than me? You seem to think you are."
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
I will provide a summary of my view to be clear, we could have debated the plus and minus side of such a suggestion but I will not debate any longer with individuals that lacks basic social graces and manners. I don't come here for abuse, I come here for debate.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
A person holding a civil role, political or legal should avoid any involvement within any activity which could be brought into question with regards to a conflict of interest. Be that membership of an organisation or external business interests. There are already many safeguards in place to cover a big portion of this scope.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
Any membership to any such group or business association should be declared, It is in the interest of the public to know about any such associations.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
If it is not possible to suitably audit the membership or business association and it's activities then to preserve impartiality of the civic role the member should refrain from any such association.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
So if people what to read church or parish meeting minutes that is possible and fine or a companies set of accounts. A private fraternal organisation is not due to the secret element and due to possibility of a conflict of interest occuring the civic role which is the primary duty and responsibility of the person should be paramount. Don't like it then don't take the job, a requirement to ensure fairness in the political and legal system.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
I don't see what your problem with that is?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
There has to be some rules, guidelines, boundries or restriction for government and the legal system to exist correct? Or can I as British citizen stand for President of the United States? Why not because there is a rule, it restricts my freedom to do the role. Could I represent the people of an adopted country? Remember I would need to be voted in by those same people so if they were happy with it in a democratic system what would be the problem?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
My suggestion is that an additional rule to go along with the many that exist removes the ability of a person performing a civic role which is accountable to the public to be a member of a secret group that has no accountability or transparency to the public which they service. That sounds quite reasonable and common sense when looking at it objectively.
So take your list of groups and tick off all that apply, hows that?
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
I really don't care what you do, who you meet and you can keep it as secret as you like. Not bothered at all. I distrust Freemasonary based on personal experience, but I have tried to not let that cloud my statement. I have tried to be objective and apply logic and common sense.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
What I do care about is someone performing a civic role which could be compromised by external interests (ANY external interests). If your happy to have a legal and political system which does not have any controls or safety measures over those which govern or administer justice then it is you that is opening the door for the installation of a corrupt and extremist group. Ooops too late.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
You can throw religion into the equation if you like, that messes up just about anything but the fact stands and risk mitigation against such acts for those in such positions of power should exist and in the large part they do. That is my view point, you are entitled to yours.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
See I managed to get my point across without any offensive remarks, I have not questioned your intelligence, vision capability, linked you at an extremist group or hinted at a criminal past. It's not that hard to be polite in a debate with the opposing view point, you should try alot harder. As a group you may be able to get a discount on a class or something.
Originally posted by Bunker or Bust
I raised the point because I wanted to debate the high number of fraternal group members in positions of power and if it is a good thing and should something be done about it? This very fact fuels alot of debate on ATS, but it appears that debate is not something you want.