It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now, researchers have sequenced the genomes of two extremophiles that love life extremely cold. They live at the bottom of Ace Lake in Antarctica, where there is no oxygen and the average temperature is a brutal 33 degrees Fahrenheit.
Some of these hardy organisms also live in oxygen-starved environments, without sunlight or carbon, and scientists believe that studying these microbes could reveal the boundaries of extreme environments that support life here on Earth and on other planets.
After the Viking voyages to Mars in the 1970s turned up no trace of life, as we knew it, some scientists dismissed the idea of Martian life. Twenty years later, with the discovery of organisms that can survive without oxygen, carbon, or sunlight, researchers are rethinking the boundaries of what environments may support life.
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
We can weigh the probability within reason as to what's most likely and what's less likely based on the available evidence. We do it everday and in all walks of life.
Mathematically we can weigh the probability simply based on the billions of earth like planets, extremophiles, liquid water on Mars, amino acids in the dust clouds of comets and signs of microbial life on Mars.
You can do this by simply imputing new values into Drakes equation based on current knowledge.
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by Matrix Rising
it's a 100%...the odds of winning the lottery is 1 in a 137 million. there are on the conservative side 200 billion stars in the milky way galaxy alone.
you have a 1,400 better chance of winning the lottery, then NOT finding life in this galaxy.
how anybody says that there is NO LIFE OUT THERE BESIDES OURS is beyond any logical human reasoning.
Originally posted by skip_brilliantine
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by Matrix Rising
it's a 100%...the odds of winning the lottery is 1 in a 137 million. there are on the conservative side 200 billion stars in the milky way galaxy alone.
you have a 1,400 better chance of winning the lottery, then NOT finding life in this galaxy.
Your point is taken, but you know that analogy still doesn't make any sense, right? The odds you cite truly have nothing to do with one another. As if the frequency of life in the galaxy has any relation to the frequency of winning numbers in a lottery.
how anybody says that there is NO LIFE OUT THERE BESIDES OURS is beyond any logical human reasoning.
Who is saying that?
What's the solution, in your opinion?
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
You can do this by simply imputing new values into Drakes equation based on current knowledge.
In fact, he thought of it as an organizational tool — a way to order the different issues to be discussed at the Green Bank conference, and bring them to bear on the central question of intelligent life in the universe.
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
Mathematically we can weigh the probability simply based on the billions of earth like planets, extremophiles, liquid water on Mars, amino acids in the dust clouds of comets and signs of microbial life on Mars.
You can do this by simply imputing new values into Drakes equation based on current knowledge.
Originally posted by skip_brilliantine
I take from your post that you've already (simply) inputted your new values into Drake's Equation based on "current knowledge" - how did it work out for you? What's the solution, in your opinion?
For instance, you are telling us you know, 1) fraction of stars that have planets, 2) average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets, 3) fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point, 4) the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life, 5) the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space, 6) the length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space? You don't know any of that. No one does. We can make great guesses, but no one can know for certain.