I guess my question to you would be did you ever take a physics or geology class before you created this thread?

I did, and my teachers knew everything...





.

[edit on 5-11-2009 by Solofront]

quotes from the author's from link 1

what we actually did was we looked for scientific evidence to support what we felt was correct and this scientific evidence led us to believe was incorrect.

one of the problems we encountered along the way was that a lot of the scientific discussions in books and so on was so complicated was that you couldn't follow them.

LOL, they say there is a little Sun in the middle of the earth so that it can sustain life. Did you listen to these things before you posted them?

Originally posted by HotSauce
LOL, they say there is a little Sun in the middle of the earth so that it can sustain life. Did you listen to these things before you posted them?

Yes, and I don't think it's that outrageous.

Dude, I do need to thank you. I am on part 4 and it has brought me great joy. They just said the great flood came from channels in the bottom of the ocean and water was pushed from the hollow earth into the upper earth.


Wouldn;t gravity cause all the water to flow from the upper oceans and then flood the hollow earth?

I think the hollow earth theory is very plausible. We are a cylinder spinning very quickly. What happens to the contents of a cylinder that is spun very fast. Does it all congeal in the center? No, it moves towards the edges of the cylinder.

Of course the earth probably didn't start as a cylinder. It came to be with the buildup of elements and minerals crashing together most of it microscopic. So again if we have a dense bunch of microscopic stuff spinning rapidly, how would the magnetic minerals join together? In a big ball in the center or in a shell type form. I would think the path of least resistance would be the shell like form.

EDIT TO ADD: in reply to HotSauce

I'm not saying I buy into the hollow earth theory, but it is intriguing enough that I've assumed some small possibility, as should you. When you assume 'gravity' as you do, you throw out all the hollow earth theory and disprove it with what you assume you know to be correct.

Volcanoes: well, there has to be something in between the inner and outer parts, right? that's where the magma flows.

Floods: you are assuming that the gravity pulls to the center, which isn't part of the hollow earth theory... or else anything would get pulled towards the sun center. In fact, this is part of the hollow earth theory, that the 'gravity' is caused somewhere in the layers between the inside and out, where the magma flows.

Honestly, I wanted to just lurk this thread a bit (watching something else right now), and wasn't going to chime in, but I believe you are very near the edge of harassment at this moment. I would recommend treading a bit lighter and opening your mind up a bit to the possibility of hollow earth theory. You opened your mind up to the idea that the earth was round, right? I assume you have never been in space to visually confirm this, yet you put faith in pictures, etc., aye? Remember that there are many things we (assume) are fact, yet at one time were considered just theories, and quite outrageous ones at that! On the other side, people used to use Radium lined bottles to heat water, and they used to have x-ray machines at carnivals. We thought these things to be harmless, and now know that they are quite the opposite.

Hopefully you get the jist of my post.

[edit on 5-11-2009 by Earthscum]