It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Without a deep understanding of the Bible I guess a lot of this goes over some peoples heads (I do not mean offence)
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
I would like to know, where did JESUS GO WHEN HE WAS RESSURECTED when he vanished. Not saying he was necessarly abducted but where did he go??? Did he just vanish into thin air and leave no trace or what?
Originally posted by moocowman
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
I would like to know, where did JESUS GO WHEN HE WAS RESSURECTED when he vanished. Not saying he was necessarly abducted but where did he go??? Did he just vanish into thin air and leave no trace or what?
Jesus was not resurrected this is a common myth perpetrated by the editors of the bibles.
Jesus' body was entombed at talpiot along with some of his family his godman attributes were plagiarized from other resurrection deities and naught but a control tool used withe exceeding effectiveness by the roman catholic church. In other words the story is a a fairytale designed to extract money and control the gullible.
Originally posted by moocowman
...Jesus was not resurrected this is a common myth perpetrated by the editors of the bibles.
Jesus' body was entombed at talpiot along with some of his family ....
SO you feel a reawakin of the CHRIST DIDNT OCCURE, ok thats cool. DO you feel he died on the cruc and that is it?
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by moocowman
...Jesus was not resurrected this is a common myth perpetrated by the editors of the bibles.
Jesus' body was entombed at talpiot along with some of his family ....
?????
You mean the ones that were matryed later? They were killed for following the devine Jesus, as they claimed...but knew they buried him?
Astronomically illogical!!!!
Doesn't add up moo, sorry
OT
Originally posted by OldThinker
reply to post by pmexplorer
sign-off is just habit....I'll work on it ok
Originally posted by wonderworld
reply to post by OldThinker
Hi OT,
You are 100% correct that no christian is abducted and if that Christian was a bit on the luke warm side all he would need to do is say the magic words.
I had a similar thread if your interested. www.abovetopsecret.com...
What are "most" of the UFO's. Most of them are the "fallen ones" and their hybrid offspring, the Neplilim. They have always been around but not in such large numbers as of recent years. Their purpose is to re-take control of the Earth and set up a dominion where Satan can openly exist.
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
SO you feel a reawakin of the CHRIST DIDNT OCCURE, ok thats cool. DO you feel he died on the cruc and that is it?
I don't actually have any feelings upon the matter, however I do attempt to observe evidence when there is any.
If your implying reanimation by "reawking" then it would appear that there is no evidence for this, yes there is hearsay ie the gospels but no evidence.
Nevertheless if we are to accept for a moment that the hearsay could possibly have some merit then logic would dictate that the more prozaic explanation should be considered first, as Old Thinker often quotes "occams razor".
Scriptures allude to the Jerusalem Church conducting ceremonies involving the raising of the dead, however this is figuratively raising of the dead ie the dead were the uninitiated.
Would it not be more sensible and logical to consider that a resurrection was merely a symbolic ceremony hearkening back to the Egyptian roots of apotheosis , given the root of Israel lay in Egypt ?
Does it not make sense to apply probability ? Ie
We have a contradictory uncorroborated narrative in relation to a character of supernatural origin = probably fiction
Yet if we have the same narrative, a supporting cult ceremony, a body and remove the supernatural elements we could the probably have a real person embroiled in a semi fictional narrative, manipulated to suit the dogmas of the editors.
Surely the staring point should be the evidence that is corroborated 100% first, eliminate the improbable until the probable has been exhausted ?
Perhaps we should go with Sherlock Holmes ?
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"
Given both points above as the case, its impossible to say that no true christian has ever been abducted, because no one would ever know for sure, except for God, and he/she/it tends to keep things to his/her/its self.