You do NOT own your car/truck/SUV!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 06:27 AM by nrky
Nobody has mentioned this yet in this thread, so I will.

1: "You don't own your SUV/Truck/Car"

2: "Yes you do! If you pay for it"

My response 3:
You haven't actually paid for it if you used cash, because all cash is, is a promissory note. 'This note is legal tender throughout Australia', a 'note' given legal 'tender' status, is not money, it is tender "An offer which is capable of acceptance" according to Butterworths Australian Legal dictionary.
So in essence you are paying for your car with more debt... so you haven't actually 'paid' for your car, therefore, YOU DO NOT OWN YOUR CAR.

You do not own your car that you paid for with 'cash notes', because the promissory notes were printed from a treasury bond written on your behalf by representatives of the society you chose to vote and participate in. A security interest was created at the time the bond was created, to nullify the debt (provide equal exchange between the two commercial parties), and the bond was sold to the banks in exchange for 'cash notes', at interest.
Since we have seen inflation our whole lives (where inflation is the constant creation of more treasury bonds/'money'), the value of the security interest per person in a society, can only increase each year of their life. Each member of the Commonwealth of Australia (I think the same applies to Canada, too) owns an equal portion of the treasury security bonds appropriated from us at birth.
When they try to tell us that some people have more 'money' than other people in the country, I laugh at them because what they hold is not actually money, it is legal tender.


So, no, you do not own your car, because the debt notice that you used to pay for that car has a security bond posted against it, and the secretary of the treasury is holding it in trust for you, and is the legal owner because you haven't claimed it yet.



P.S When the sovereign movement takes over the whole world, and we enter into a global anarcho-capitalistic society, be prepared to see a REAL money system using gold-backed interest-free securities, THEN you will be able to say "I own the car that I paid for with real money I earned from a real job".

[edit on 23/10/2009 by nrky]


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 08:09 AM by ohh_pleasee
reply to post by SecretGoldfish



The state didn't do anything pertaining to those situations because you relinquish individual rights, as well as decision making, along with handing over ownership of your car.

Therefore, it is handled however they feel it should be handled. Hence, we all get screwed.


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 08:35 AM by SecretGoldfish
reply to post by ohh_pleasee



no, it's because there are insufficient ties between the state's ability to lien my title for them to hold me liable for any loss of property -- 'their' car . . . or for my sister-in-law to prove up their liability when she was struck by 'their' car.

if i can sell something as i see fit, move something as i see fit, bequeath something upon death as i see fit, then it's mine. i don't see how it can be otherwise, realistically, only hysterically.

in theory, california can take just about anything from me, my kid, even my dog, but it's not through its power as a property owner. so i guess i don't really 'own' anything if this is your stance i suppose. regulatory powers and powers of conservatorship can be broad.

arguing whether it's proper for the state to seize property as it does these days is one thing, and i won't argue the state has FAR too much power to regulate our lives and belongings . . . but it's just not really an ownership issue. you do own your car. the state can take it away. that's life i guess.


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 08:41 AM by SpartanKingLeonidas
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Historical-Mozart
You do NOT own your car/truck/SUV!



Yeah, you do, if you pay for it.

First off, Allodial title is not for personal property.

The MCO or MSO is the manufacturer's papers. Shows when and where the vehicle was built and if tariffs involved if imported. When you buy the car/truck/trailer, the MSO is turned in and you get a title in your name. If it wasn't done this way, there would be nothing to show you owned the vehicle.

I tried to read that web page with Mr. McCarthy's letters. I couldn't read it all the way through because he was being such an idiot. But, it was good for laugh when I read the response from the fella at the Motor Vehicle Bureau
Thank you for the compliment on my "candid" response to your previous letter of February 10, 1986. Please allow me one observation. The eight months you have spent in this quest could have been shortened considerably had you refrained from convoluted analogies and, in your own words, "gotten to the point a bit sooner with more honest and complete answers".

Please feel free to use any of my responses as "material evidence" when you are arrested for driving an improperly registered motor vehicle in the State of Missouri. Although the arresting officer and the court may find my letters instructional, those officers will, no doubt, quickly come to the point with an "honest and complete" request to see your Missouri certificate of registration. Of course, we know that you will not have one, because you have spent eight months gathering valuable "material evidence" from my office in order to stall application for Missouri title and registration documents. You may discover at that point that Missouri State Highway Patrol troopers are also quite "candid".

Now that's classic.


I agree with you 100% as the the writer of the story in the link provided obviously has zero clue of the language of law.

Manufacturing is the state of creating something.

Quote from Wikipedia : Manufacturing

Manufacturing is the use of machines, tools and labor to make things for use or sale.

The term may refer to a range of human activity, from handicraft to high tech, but is most commonly applied to industrial production, in which raw materials are transformed into finished goods on a large scale.

Such finished goods may be used for manufacturing other, more complex products, such as household appliances or automobiles, or sold to wholesalers, who in turn sell them to retailers, who then sell them to end users - the "consumers".


Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin

Quote from Wikipedia : Manufacturer's Statement of Origin

A Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin (MCO), also known as a Manufacturer’s Statement of Origin (MSO), is a specified document certifying the country of origin of the merchandise required by certain foreign countries for tariff purposes, it sometimes requires the signature of the consulate of the country to which it is destined.

A Certificate of Origin is employed to certify that a good being exported either from the United States into Canada or Mexico or from Canada or Mexico into the United States qualifies as an originating good for purposes of preferential tariff treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).


This is the same type of demand as the Department of Agriculture demanding that a seller of produce puts the country of origin on bananas, to inform the public, thereby stating the country of origin, to better inform the public as to where their fruit is grown from, in case they want to know, as well as if they want to boycott products from that country due to their knowledge about the politics of the region.

An allodial title is nothing of the sort as previously stated in any way whatsover.

Quote from Wikipedia : Alloidal Title

Allodial title is a concept in some systems of property law.

It describes a situation where real property (land, buildings and fixtures) is owned free and clear of any encumbrances, including liens, mortgages and tax obligations.

Allodial title is inalienable, in that it cannot be taken by any operation of law for any reason whatsoever.

In common legal use, allodial title is used to distinguish absolute ownership of land by individuals from feudal ownership, where property ownership is dependent on relationship to a lord or the sovereign.


That is a concept from the Middle Ages, also called the Dark Ages, where ignorance ruled due to corruption of sovereign powers, Governments, and as well the elite powers who took advantage of the ignorance of the masses.

In this case the thread is about vehicles and the misleading and misinformed populace will be easily mislead and I have to wonder the original posters intent towards people who know no better due to their ignorance of the laws of the United States.

In order to sell a vehicle, a manufacturer has to supply the M.S.O. for the vehicle, so that they can later re-sell the vehicle with a bill of sale which is the legal documentation stating someone has now purchased said vehicle and is now in possession and ownership of said vehicle.

Quote from Wikipedia : Bill of Sale

A bill of sale is a legal document made by a 'seller' to a purchaser, reporting that on a specific date, at a specific locality, and for a particular sum of money or other "value received", the seller sold to the purchaser a specific item of personal, or parcel of real, property of which he had lawful possession.

It is a written instrument which evidences the transfer of title to personal property from the vendor, seller, to the vendee, buyer.


A bill of sale is furthermore a contract of sale, a commitment of purchasing said item, vehicle, home, jewelry etc, with the intent towards ownership.

Quote from Wikipedia : Contract of Sale

A contract of sale is a legal contract an exchange of goods, services or property to be exchanged from seller (or vendor) to buyer (or purchaser) for an agreed upon value in money (or money equivalent) paid or the promise to pay same.

It is a specific type of legal contract.


This website is about Denying Ignorance not about creating more of it.

Historical-Mozart, is your intent to mislead and misdirect people, or are you trolling for free legal advice from people who actually know the law?

As far as purchasing it with money or legal tender that is a whole other matter.

I highly suggest anyone who wants to know the law either look it up in a law book for themselves or go to a website like this one for Legal Help.

[edit on 23-10-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 09:27 AM by slimpickens93
Originally posted by SecretGoldfish
then why didn't the state of california come after me for totaling their car a few years back? total loss, insurance went right to me, not the state.

why doesn't the state pursue me for its loss?

because it was my car, that's why.

and when my sister-in-law was injured by an uninsured driver, why couldn't she recoup her loss from california?

because it's not their car, that's why.

california has a regulatory interest in my vehicle, not an ownership interest. not in any real sense anyway, only arguably in an MSO created legal fiction.



And what did you do with that "insurance money"? You went right out and "purchased" another car to replace the one you lost. Most likely, you even "purchased" a car which was newer/faster/better/prettier/more expensive. If so, any "money" added to the insurance toward the new purchase is your recent labor.

Your recent labor (added money), plus old your old labor (insurance), as well as your future labor (tax/interest) all go right back to the bankers (via the state).

If anybody owns anything, it is the bankers. Just about everything in this world of any monetary value other than some gifts of nature (air/water/firewood/berries/etc..) is simply a representation of your labor.

Your labor is what the bankers own, and in effect, they own you.

Labor is the only thing in our world which truly holds value. If you pick up a berry from the ground to eat, you have paid for that berry with your labor. That berry has no value until you pick it up and put it in your mouth.

So if you buy a $30,000 car, the only way you can pay for it/own it is with your labor.

While bankers set the interest rates and such, it is not really relevant in my opinion. I fear it is a natural law that labor is in a permanent state of "inflation". Because berries digest and cars rust, your labor at some point is used up and no longer has value.

Therefore, you are the one who sets the value of your labor. Only you can choose what you will work for. Only you can choose how much labor you are willing to trade for a car.

The state, bankers, lawyers, owners, workers, anyone and everyone else are only "middlemen" who facilitate the trade of your labor (which is a representation of their labor).

The state/bankers are "stealing" nothing from you. Only you decide how much labor you will trade.

What are you willing to work for? Exactly what you have.


reply posted on 23-10-2009 @ 09:44 AM by daddio
reply to post by Historical-Mozart



If someone has not already posted it, the answer is the "STRAWMAN", your name in all capital letters, you can recalim it or redeem it and then the State has no authority over you OR your property.

spiritualeconomicsnow.net...


spiritualeconomicsnow.net...


spiritualeconomicsnow.net...


abundanthope.net...



Read all the articles at the links and you "may" understand it and be able to out yourself. YOU are not a "person" within the motor vehicle code!!! More later.

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 16 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 18 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 4 days ago with 77 member flags
Superbowl Halftime Conspiracy!
  Posted 8 days ago with 75 member flags