It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Petrified Alien Found At Wright Patterson in 2003?

page: 7
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 12:44 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 12:58 PM
I don't know about this.

...thus creating great confusion in the astrological world...

Astrological? Don't they mean astronomical?


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 12:59 PM
I also think Dr. Russo's telling the caller it was a hoax is very suspect. Don't tell me that the stories weren't proof read before publication. I'm guessing it was some very ballsy person who thought he would let the world in on a little secret.

Then what we need to do is find out who wrote the article or put it together to see if they are still breathing. If not, and the death is mysterious, that would account for Dr. Russo's strange behavior over the phone.

Something like this if true would be grounds for termination by the black op's controllers who have kept the Roswell incident and others under wraps for so long.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:11 PM
reply to post by skepticantiseptic

I agree, I think the next step is to find the person who wrote the article and give him/her a call.

I am looking into it myself and if I can find out who for sure, I will try to contact them with more questions regarding this whole story.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:12 PM
the saga continues? it sounds like the next chapter of star wars. iif they had a picture or two it might be more credible.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:35 PM
reply to post by RoyalCanadian

And if they had a picture you would say it was photo shopped or a hoax picture... and what is something they could call the article that would be better than "the saga continues"... because anything they name it could be subject to question.

My point is, if you don't credit this at all, what will you ever credit?

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 01:48 PM
reply to post by Mayan_Soul

Thanks for taking the time to call! I'm wondering, did he rush you off the phone? Hang up?

I'd assume that if this was intended as an inside joke, Dr. Russo would have been notified that his name was going to be used. Do you think he'd answer at least that question in another phone call? I'd like to get confirmation if this was a hoax...or at least a story about the "Postscript's" creation, from either Dr. Russo or the author, regardless of where it leads.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:15 PM
reply to post by Mayan_Soul

I'm sure you understand the need to be highly skeptical when dealing with matters of this nature. And if there is room for doubt (which there appears to be in this article), then you have to point out those areas of potentially misleading info. ET Presence/disclosure, etc. is not a matter to be taken lightly. It is a very important subject to our planet and our species, therefore the skepticism.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:45 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 03:52 PM
Im sorry, but we do not discuss the status of ATS members.

Why we do not discuss banned or fellow members

Please discuss the topic: Petrified Alien Found At Wright Patterson in 2003? And not fellow members.

[edit on October 22nd 2009 by greeneyedleo]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:17 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 04:52 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 05:12 PM
let the op come back plz.

The story is tongue-in-cheek but includes a lot of odd details. Like a Da Vinci painting that hides a message. The author is definitely mocking certain groups and people. The last sentence mentions medical experts, i.e., psychiatrists.

Just to clarify, the article mentions the date 5 /27/2003 (not 5/23, unless I missed something). C2C that night was Nibiru & Crop Circles with former cnn analyst Marshal Masters.

[edit on 22-10-2009 by oneangrymonk]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 06:37 PM
No photos or drawings as we find with similar claims.
People are finding ETs and going on youtube every month.
Its a CIA backed or prompted idea for a major game plan.
Also because people can get away with it.
Same thing with this government document.

The SAGA is perhaps is not a real saga.
ED: Photos or videos provide evidence as image experts might
be able to say hoax or not.
ED+: From the OP:

Here is a scan from page 291. Can't make this stuff u

From the Google book page:

Postscript 291

I say its a ploy to keep the government forces miss informed because
all ex government testimonials on the "Disclosure Project" said Alien
must exist since we know nothing about the free energy UFO.
They just do not know about the engineering of Tesla which has been
hidden under bigger and bigger lies.

[edit on 10/22/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

[edit on 10/22/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 07:33 PM
Did anyone happen to read my post on page 5 ? If so any thoughts.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 07:41 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 07:54 PM
I don't think I've ever posted here and had to struggle to get my username/password, which was created some time ago, but I think this is really interesting based on the accurate facts and names that were given. I'm not sure if Frank Stuart Patterson is well known or not, but I found this about him and the story mentioned :

On June 19, 1918, little more than a month after his arrival at Wilbur Wright, Lieutenant Patterson and his aerial observer, Lieutenant LeRoy Amos Swan, went aloft in their DH-4, Army Air Service Serial #32098, to test newly installed machine guns synchronized by Nelson interrupter gear equipment. Their instructions were to fire about one hundred rounds into the field from 6,000 feet, 10,000 feet, and 15,000 feet. They completed the first two trials successfully, firing the guns through the propeller as they dived. Lieutenant Patterson then climbed to 15,000 feet and pointed the airplane downward in a steep dive. Just as reports of the guns reached the earth, the wings of the airplane were seen to collapse and separate completely from the fuselage, leaving it to travel nearly across the field at full power during its fall. The machine was completely wrecked and the crew crushed beyond recognition.

The initial report of the accident wired to Washington indicated that it was not clear whether the wings folded up or were swept back. It was subsequently determined by the aircraft accident investigation board that:

Patterson’s accident believed to be due to shearing of tie rod that passes through fuselage near radiator and connects the two fittings to which are attached nose drift wires. Accident occurred while diving hence considerable strain put on those two fittings. Tie rod sheared but fittings show very little elongation showing that weakness lay in tie rod. There being nothing else to take backward strain on wings, wings probably folded back and separated from fuselage.

This report clarified the popular, but erroneous assumption that bullets from the machine gun shattered the propeller blades, which flew back and tore the wings from the airplane.
Lieutenant Patterson was buried next to his father in Woodland Cemetery, Dayton, on June 21, 1918, following a military funeral. He was survived by his mother, Julia Shaw Patterson Carnell; by a brother, Jefferson, who was a lieutenant in the field artillery serving with the 83rd Division in France; by a sister, Mary, who was active in wartime Red Cross work; and by other members of the illustrious Patterson family, including his first cousin, Frederick Beck Patterson, who later headed the Dayton Air Service Committee in its drive to donate land for the creation of Wright Field.

I'm also pretty sure this is the same book, the first 45 pages of it have been scanned in. I don't think anyone else posted this. Providing it for those that have asked to look at page 291 within the context of the book :

While looking over some of the things in early 2003, I found articles where they discussed contracts for weapons companies that were, specifically, "flight path generators, ground radar simulations, air-to-air combat among different types of aircraft, and damage expected from various missiles and projectiles." Probably standard stuff but interesting.

Some stuff about a possible underground base, and one retired worker who, before dying, dropped some details. Couldn't find a reputable link but interesting, they also mention the hangar :

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 08:45 PM
This "Wright-Patterson Air Force Base hurried up to the warehouses of the Custodian of Alien Properties, and took possession of all the documents and other materials, and every bit of them have been classified at the highest level ever since, the government having declassified NONE of them."

They have been involved with Aliens for quite awhile.
And covering up their actions with bogus alien stories.

I knew WP was involved is a conspiracy as soon as I heard the ET
approval by a government document.
They lie because they can not tell the truth. or worst, do not
know the truth. They can't deny the truth if they know what the
truth is, and that's the problem. Keep the most in the dark
as possible, then the lie is not a lie.

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 08:57 PM

Project Silver Bug took place in 1955 at Wright-Patterson AFB. It was declassified in 1995 and it is basically plans for a UFO.

The link above is to the actual PDF document and I can't really bother to upload print screens, but there are some pictures of the design and it's pretty darn interesting.

I'm sorry if I'm getting a little off topic but I think an understanding of Wright-Patterson AFB makes this more interesting, although I wonder if perhaps it furthers the idea that this was just a big joke since there apparently is a history of speculation. But that leaves the question - since when did military documents start including satire (assuming this IS a military document, which I don't think has been confirmed yet?)?

posted on Oct, 22 2009 @ 09:15 PM
A couple of things I'd like to know..

What does it say in the book under the green alien pics?

Russo was a materials specialist? Why would he examine an alien body?

top topics

<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in