It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chiron613
The Nobel Commission is not a State. It's a private institution.
This is just more Obama-bashing. Not saying he did or didn't deserve the prize. I wouldn't know about that. But he isn't barred from accepting it.
Who selects the Nobel Laureates?
The process of selecting the Nobel Laureates is exclusively handled by the Nobel Prize awarding institutions.
In his last will and testament, Alfred Nobel specifically designated the institutions responsible for the prizes he wished to be established:
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for the Nobel Prize in Physics and Chemistry.
The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet for the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
The Swedish Academy for the Nobel Prize in Literature.
A committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Parliament (Storting) for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Originally posted by liveandletlive
When did a sitting pres. get the award in the past?
Originally posted by SaturnFX
As far as the prize money, that might have to wait till he is out of office since even donating it to charity gives a rather large tax break.
So, award from organizations = fine, prize money = gotta wait for it
Originally posted by liveandletlive
Originally posted by SaturnFX
As far as the prize money, that might have to wait till he is out of office since even donating it to charity gives a rather large tax break.
So, award from organizations = fine, prize money = gotta wait for it
So if a Saudi Prince or foreign government wants to give our pres. money in violation of the constitution, you think its ok so long as he waits until he is out of office? I think a bribe is a bribe regardless of when you receive it! Dont you think?
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by liveandletlive
When did a sitting pres. get the award in the past?
Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson both received this award during their second term as U.S. President.
Originally posted by piddles
reply to post by NOTurTypical
so someone said something stupid and wrong. happens everyday. Using something stupid that someone said to make a point seems to equate to...hmm lemme think, stupid.
He's obviously not any kind of powerful entity, since he can't fix the economy with like religious miracles.
I don't like you making a useless post that doesn't say anything or add to the conversation.
that is all.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles
BACK ON TOPIC
Point one. I can't stand Obama's policies, politics. I think he's going to ruin this country.
Point two. He wasn't president when he was awarded the Nobel. It is for 2009. Then, he campaigned, was a junior senator, and lied a bucket load.
Point three. The votes were in February 1st. He hadn't done anything yet.
Conclusion, if it wasn't for the fact that he is black, then it was for his promises of disarmament, backing down, wimping out. Two other sitting presidents have won it in the past.
His winning is more embarrassing than him winning it illegally.
Originally posted by liveandletlive
reply to post by SaturnFX
I read a little on Roosevelt & Wilson. Roosevelt said:
The gold medal which formed part of the prize I shall always keep, and I shall hand it on to my children as a precious heirloom. The sum of money provided as part of the prize by the wise generosity of the illustrious founder of this world-famous prize system, I did not, under the peculiar circumstances of the case, feel at liberty to keep. I think it eminently just and proper that in most cases the recipient of the prize should keep for his own use the prize in its entirety. But in this case, while I did not act officially as President of the United States, it was nevertheless only because I was President that I was enabled to act at all; and I felt that the money must be considered as having been given me in trust for the United States. I therefore used it as a nucleus for a foundation to forward the cause of industrial peace, as being well within the general purpose of your Committee.
Dont know what Wilson did. My point is that "if" your not suppose to accept it, I wouldnt think it would be ok to wait and then accept it.
[edit on 16-10-2009 by liveandletlive]
Originally posted by OverSword
It is unbelievable how many of you have plainly responded without first reading the article! How friggin lazy can you be! Apparently you are the ones who think your opinion or emotional reflex responses is more important or meaningful to the rest of us than facts or the original intent of this post.