An Unconstitutional Nobel, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 54 times


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:19 AM by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles


Why get upset?

Also, in Obama's America, you do find issue with it. Criticize George Bush? You get your own tv show.

Criticize Obama? The "poop" storm flies!


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:34 AM by piddles
reply to post by mikerussellus


I am not upset. I don't get worked up in these forums because that is a true waste of time and bandwith. If you believe I am showing some kind of anger towards you, it is a misinterpretation.

I must point out that you didn't really give me a reply as much as you just reiterated what you just said.

A "poop"storm happens when you talk about politics in general. Saying that's what happens when once criticizes obama is asinine and disregards ALL political discussion (considering it usually always leads to conversational rudeness and verbal cheap shots)


I wish to defend the content of this website and my reading experience, which is often ruined by stupid filler comments that don't say anything or contribute to the conversation, such as the ones I have previously described (sarcasm and the supposed suppression of things one says in "Obama's America").


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:36 AM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by piddles


Louis Farrakhan stated Obama is the "messiah".

I'm just REPEATING it. If you don't like it, tough, I could care less.



reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:38 AM by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles


Point taken.

I will continue to bring up each and every issue of Obama and his policies.

Let the chips fall where they may.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:39 AM by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by piddles
reply to post by mikerussellus


I said it was useless, I didn't say you're not allowed to say it. And yes it is useless, it's an exaggeration of what democrats believe, followed by a comment that is being spun in a way that Obama indoctrinates children rather than the truth that parents indoctrinate their children.





Ummm, however it IS the parents job to "indoctrinate", I call it "raising" myself, their children, not Obama's, not anyone else's for that matter.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:44 AM by piddles
reply to post by NOTurTypical


so someone said something stupid and wrong. happens everyday. Using something stupid that someone said to make a point seems to equate to...hmm lemme think, stupid.

He's obviously not any kind of powerful entity, since he can't fix the economy with like religious miracles.




I don't like you making a useless post that doesn't say anything or add to the conversation.


that is all.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:46 AM by piddles
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by piddles
reply to post by mikerussellus


I said it was useless, I didn't say you're not allowed to say it. And yes it is useless, it's an exaggeration of what democrats believe, followed by a comment that is being spun in a way that Obama indoctrinates children rather than the truth that parents indoctrinate their children.





Ummm, however it IS the parents job to "indoctrinate", I call it "raising" myself, their children, not Obama's, not anyone else's for that matter.


good thing the parents ok'd them singing the song and not obama forcing them to sing it then, huh


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:54 AM by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles


BACK ON TOPIC

Point one. I can't stand Obama's policies, politics. I think he's going to ruin this country.

Point two. He wasn't president when he was awarded the Nobel. It is for 2009. Then, he campaigned, was a junior senator, and lied a bucket load.

Point three. The votes were in February 1st. He hadn't done anything yet.

Conclusion, if it wasn't for the fact that he is black, then it was for his promises of disarmament, backing down, wimping out. Two other sitting presidents have won it in the past.

His winning is more embarrassing than him winning it illegally.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:58 AM by piddles
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles


Point taken.

I will continue to bring up each and every issue of Obama and his policies.

Let the chips fall where they may.



I wholeheartedly welcome the discussion of his issues and hope it leads to meaningful conversation and the truth.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 07:59 AM by JohnD
As a nation, Sweden has no official say in how the foundation awards it's prizes:


The Nobel Foundation is a private institution established in 1900 based on the will of Alfred Nobel. The Foundation manages the assets made available through the will for the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and Peace. It represents the Nobel Institutions externally and administers informational activities and arrangements surrounding the presentation of the Nobel Prize. The Foundation also administers the Nobel Symposium Program.


The Nobel Foundation

However, because of money and prestige associated with the award, it is a safe bet that the motives for awarding it often have political implications. Think of it as a big campaign contribution from a lobbyist. But it's not a campaign contribution, nor is it an award giving the President any special citizenship to Sweden. This is without question some sort of quid pro quo.

Just less than a century ago, one can look back and realize that if you have enough money and power you can get a goverment to do anything.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:00 AM by piddles
reply to post by mikerussellus


truthfully, I dont think even he thought he deserved it



reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:02 AM by mikerussellus
Originally posted by piddles
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by piddles


Point taken.

I will continue to bring up each and every issue of Obama and his policies.

Let the chips fall where they may.





I wholeheartedly welcome the discussion of his issues and hope it leads to meaningful conversation and the truth.


Agreed. And "The lone Gunmen" rock, by the way.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:03 AM by mikerussellus
Originally posted by piddles
reply to post by mikerussellus


truthfully, I dont think even he thought he deserved it


He would have been a better man (in my eyes) if he would have refused it.


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 08:06 AM by CoffinFeeder
reply to post by dbates


eh, much as I don't like the guy and do not beleive he has earned the award and so on; I don't see a conflict in it yet.

The award gives him no advantages, does not denote a title or office or any of the such.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags