While petitioners’ counsel argues that the severability provision of paragraph 20 of the petition allows the court to strike any provisions thereof that are unconstitutional or invalid, the extent of the impropriety of the proposal, as correctly set forth by the Referee, would result in a substantial evisceration of the petition and, even if legally permissible, would be inappropriate as inconsistent with the law sought by the signatories to the petition.

Originally posted by Lillydale
reply to post by Joey Canoli

---

If you would read what you are replying to, you will see that I am not advocating that this judge be over ruled. I am speaking specifically to the glee you express in seeing that requests for more investigation get shot down. Do not pretend you are only opposed because of how they did it or because of Ed freaking Asner.

Q4 Do you think President Bush intentionally
allowed the 9/11 attacks to take place because
he wanted the United States to go to war in the
Middle East? If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If
you’re not sure, press 3.
Yes .................................................. ............... 14%
No .................................................. ................. 78%
Not Sure.............................................. ............ 8%

As long as you are so outraged, where is your thread about your tax dollars going to AIG? To subsidize private health insurance? To bailout BofA? To fund illegal wars and ship drugs? Personally, I am sick of my tax dollars being spent on rich people doing careless things and would welcome some of it going to something useful for a change.

Do not tell me to read the petition, read my posts. I have never once defended this particular case.