posted on Nov, 2 2009 @ 03:12 PM
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by Jezus
Now you admit there are some unexplained anomalies?
No, we explained 9/11 "Truthers" many years ago.
25 Tactics for Truth Suppression
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone
will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and
have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually
them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where
the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
Example: "Flight 553's crash was pilot error, according to the NTSB findings. Digging up new witnesses who say the CIA brought it down at a selected
spot and were waiting for it with 50 agents won't revive that old dead horse buried by NTSB more than twenty years ago."
Proper response: You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your ignore the issues and imply they are old charges as if new information
is irrelevant. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 10 - associate charges with old news)?
Btw, Jezus, yes, I think this is jthomas' backhanded way of admitting there are unexplained anomalies regarding 9/11. Notice how he totally
ignored what you were posting about and took the opportunity to post a one-liner about "truthers" instead.
Yep, he sees it. He just has no business here with facts, only propaganda. That's the issue.
[edit on 2-11-2009 by bsbray11]