Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Every One Speaks about HAARP, but did you know...

page: 6
116
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 1 2009 @ 09:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
www.haarp.alaska.edu...
www.agu.org...
en.wikipedia.org...


Well nice research BUT... you keep showing us the scientific uses of HAARP and similar projects... and as such you use CIVILIIN references...



In FY 2008: Continue coupling of radiation belt model to global geospace environment models to increase accuracy and lead time. Validate models for ionospheric penetration by very low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic waves and their injection into the magnetosphere....

In FY 2009: Continue measurement of interplanetary magnetic fields using wide-field radio array. Complete Spiral 1 magnetic reconnection model to study solar flare initiation and energy storage. Continue program to test and
evaluate empirical flare prediction models based on synoptic data from Air Force and national observatory assets. Complete coupling of radiation belt model to global geospace environment models to increase accuracy and lead time. Utilize three-dimensional global radiation belt diffusion models to simulate ultimate global effect of wave-particle interactions from VLF electromagnetic wave power injected in narrow altitude slices of radiation belts. Validate models for virtual VLF electromagnetic wave generation in the ionosphere and global transport and power
distribution.

In FY 2008: Use satellite tracking test bed and Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing tracking telescopes to demonstrate Space Situational Awareness (SSA) capability of HT sensors and validate the utility of this
technique to obtain operational and health status of resident space objects


Use of the metal oxide clouds and HAARP

Real purpose... MILITARY communications and early warning missile shield



In FY 2007: Performed metric tests of C/NOFS scintillation forecasting system. Integrated C/NOFS results into ionospheric specification and forecasting algorithms and models for enhanced military utility of scintillation warning system. Investigated coupled solar-magnetospheric-ionospheric-thermospheric models to improve forecast lead times for radar operations, and communications/navigation outages. Developed portable ionospheric sensor suite for measuring total electron content and communications/navigation scintillation

In FY 2008: Expand high-latitude data collection to initiate a high-latitude scintillation warning system. Investigate the impact of convection of scintillations to higher latitudes on Ultra High Frequency communication and Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation systems. Investigate HF induced artificial scintillation generation using the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). Develop portable ionospheric sensor suite for
measuring total electron content and communications/navigation scintillation. Initiate space radar data collection for ionosphere compensation study. Develop scintillation mitigation technology by using metal-oxide space cloud. Develop techniques of analyzing GPS radio occultation data acquired by C/NOFS and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) satellites Begin incorporation of Kalman filter ionospheric model into forecast models and ionospheric warfighter impact products. Conduct statistical analysis of
neutral density to improve accuracy of empirical neutral density models for specifying and forecasting neutral density during geomagnetic storms. Implement algorithm to assess impacts of penetration electric fields on generation of equatorial irregularities.



In FY 2009: Investigate solar activity on enhancement of L-band scintillations to assess the support of the scintillation database and tools to military communication and navigation systems. Measure total electron content and scintillations over the African subcontinent for better defining the equatorial scintillation and GPS error environment in the middle-eastern region. Demonstrate scintillation mitigation technology using metal-oxide space cloud. Deliver ionospheric compensation technique with wide-band radio-frequency waves. Improve modeling techniques for specifying high temporal resolution of neutral density and satellite drag to achieve predictive space situation awareness. Improve empirical and neutral density model based on Atmospheric Density Specification experiment data and develop physics-based model of the neutral composition, wind, and density. Continue transition of physics-based 3-D model of equatorial plasma bubbles into warfighter products and transition of ionospheric Kalman filter operational models into equatorial models.



Equatorial plasma bubbles to be uses as warfighter products



MAJOR THRUST: Develop High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program site transmitting and diagnostic
instrument infrastructure.
9.596 9.070 9.841

In FY 2007: Validated performance of 3.6 megawatt transmitting array in Extremely Low Frequency/Very Low Frequency (ELF/VLF) wave generation and optical emissions research programs.

In FY 2008: Conduct experimental research with the 3.6 megawatt transmitting array to develop techniques to increase the efficiency of ELF/VLF wave generated in space and initiate research to characterize their interactions with charged particles in the earth's radiation belts.

In FY 2009: Continue research to characterize wave-particle interactions and wave amplification effects in space and their potential application to mitigate charged particle effects on space systems and operations.




MAJOR THRUST: Develop basic seismic technologies to support national requirements for monitoring nuclear explosions with special focus on regional distances less than 2,000 kilometers from the sensors. 7.099 6.777 6.784

In FY 2007: Updated seismic codes for operational use. Developed hypothesis test results into potential discrimination and yield estimation techniques, while addressing unresolved hypothesis issues for seismic energy
partition, magnitudes, and source physics. Incorporated seismic energy partition effects into implications for local and regional seismic wave propagation. Developed efforts on seismic calibration; seismic detection, location, and discrimination; and observational studies of seismic wave propagation, including propagation in Eurasia. Assessed
future directions based on results obtained so far.



CONGRESSIONAL ADD:
High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program. 3.142 3.180 0.000
In FY 2007: Conducted Congressionally-directed effort for HAARP.
In FY 2008: Conduct Congressionally-directed effort for HAARP.

www.dtic.mil...

Got about 50 plus more military uses of HAARP documents that you won't find on wikipedia











[edit on 1-10-2009 by zorgon]




posted on Oct, 2 2009 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 

We've been talking about what HAARP can do. Research. And that is all this budget estimate is talking about. There is not one word about using it as a shield or weaponry.

1) We've been talking about ELF/VLF radiation and its applications.

2) A computer model to forecast the effects of solar flares makes a lot of sense. Studying how the ionosphere reacts is one of the primary purposes of HAARP.

3) What does AMOS have to do with HAARP? It's optical, HAARP is not.

4) Ionospheric scintillation is

Irregularly sturctured ionospheric regions can cause diffraction and scattering of trans-ionospheric radio signals. When received at an antenna, these signals present random temporal fluctuations in both amplitude and phase. This is known as ionospheric scintillation.
iono.jpl.nasa.gov... It can cause problems with satellite communications and navigation. It's no wonder that the military is interested in forecasting and/or mitigating it but I see nothing about an early warning missile shield in those paragraphs. There is the single mention about using HAARP to study the generation of artificial scintillation but that's covered in a few civilian papers (and wiki).

5) Again, studying the effects of solar activity on the ionosphere and its effect on scintillation. More talk about what can be done about dealing with scintillation. But they're talking about Africa. HAARP isn't in Africa. Equatorial plasma bubbles are another type of disturbance in the ionosphere which can interfere with operations. They would like to be able to create computer models of them which can be incorporated into C3 systems, not use them as weapons (hint: search "warfighter products").

6) Stuff we already know. They have generated ELF/VLF radiation (see my link). They want to do it better so they can figure out how natural and artificial ELF/VLF radiation interacts with space weather. They want to learn more about how to protect satellites from space weather.

7) I have no idea why you included research on seismic monitoring of nuclear testing in this blitz.


Science and stuff.
I don't really see anything that earth shaking (except for the seismic monitoring) in the document and and a whole lot of it is has nothing to do with HAARP.

Confuse 'em with facts. The more the better. No matter how unrelated they may be. That's the Zorgon way.

[edit on 10/2/2009 by Phage]



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by zorgon
 

We've been talking about what HAARP can do. Research. And that is all this budget estimate is talking about. There is not one word about using it as a shield or weaponry.

1) We've been talking about ELF/VLF radiation and its applications.

2) A computer model to forecast the effects of solar flares makes a lot of sense. Studying how the ionosphere reacts is one of the primary purposes of HAARP.

3) What does AMOS have to do with HAARP? It's optical, HAARP is not.

4) Ionospheric scintillation is

Irregularly sturctured ionospheric regions can cause diffraction and scattering of trans-ionospheric radio signals. When received at an antenna, these signals present random temporal fluctuations in both amplitude and phase. This is known as ionospheric scintillation.
iono.jpl.nasa.gov... It can cause problems with satellite communications and navigation. It's no wonder that the military is interested in forecasting and/or mitigating it but I see nothing about an early warning missile shield in those paragraphs. There is the single mention about using HAARP to study the generation of artificial scintillation but that's covered in a few civilian papers (and wiki).

5) Again, studying the effects of solar activity on the ionosphere and its effect on scintillation. More talk about what can be done about dealing with scintillation. But they're talking about Africa. HAARP isn't in Africa. Equatorial plasma bubbles are another type of disturbance in the ionosphere which can interfere with operations. They would like to be able to create computer models of them which can be incorporated into C3 systems, not use them as weapons (hint: search "warfighter products").

6) Stuff we already know. They have generated ELF/VLF radiation (see my link). They want to do it better so they can figure out how natural and artificial ELF/VLF radiation interacts with space weather. They want to learn more about how to protect satellites from space weather.

7) I have no idea why you included research on seismic monitoring of nuclear testing in this blitz.


Science and stuff.
I don't really see anything that earth shaking (except for the seismic monitoring) in the document and and a whole lot of it is has nothing to do with HAARP.

Confuse 'em with facts. The more the better. No matter how unrelated they may be. That's the Zorgon way.

[edit on 10/2/2009 by Phage]


Hang on a minute Phage....


We already have company's here on Earth that can send a PLASMA BEAM to manipulate SPACE JUNK... which are based on Earth

Seeing manipulating SPACE JUNK has been contracted out it would be more than obvious. I guess you don't work for science to see that link as I do


Protecting the EARTH from SPACE JUNK is a SHIELD and we have it now


Take Care!

Somamech



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Somamech
 

Please provide a source re: existent plasma beam operations.


[edit on 10/4/2009 by Phage]



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Find it yourself


Talk about Lazy bones, that one is easy to find and I hope you find it as I need a bit of entertainment





[edit on 4-10-2009 by Somamech]



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 01:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
We've been talking about what HAARP can do. Research.


No YOU have been talking about Research.. I having been tracking the military uses of HAARP including what they already do, what they plan to do and what they think they can do...




Confuse 'em with facts. The more the better. No matter how unrelated they may be. That's the Zorgon way.


Ah but see? The skeptic way is to work very hard and diligently to NOT show how things are, or may be, interrelated into a bigger picture.

While it is easy on the internet we use to find papers on the Research portion of HAARP... you and other skeptics know full well that the military portion of the data is not so openly found... and you guys count on that...

I on the other hand count on the intelligence of the majority of viewers to look at the material and follow up on their own...

And when the military sends me that declassified document on what I seek I will be sure that you are the first to see it

As to the intent to create a missile shield with HAARP and similar technology that has already been show numerous times, as has the intent to use it for specialized military communication... Not sure how many times I have to link you to that stuff before you actually 'see' it


But just one more time... just because I like you


Bush Signs To Build Alaska Anti-Missile Shield

This one is the new Poker Flats arrays already pointed to in this thread


President Bush signed a secret document called National Security Policy Directive 23. The public version of this secret document outlines a world-wide missile defense system, starting with the first installation to be in Alaska about 30 miles from the existing HAARP site. The purported aim of this missile system is to protect against missiles coming from North Korea and other rising rogue nation/states.



If it is exposed that HAARP already is a complete operating anti-missile system which covers all of the Pacific Ocean and most of eastern Asia, including China and Korea, then the need to build the big missile system and the campaign contributions to Bush all suddenly dry up.

And thus the reason for completely covering up the truth about HAARP. The public is only supposed to know HAARP to be some quirky mind or weather control experiment only believed in by conspiracy theorists. The use by the Navy and Air Force, who jointly operate HAARP, to bring down a threatening North Korean missile over Alaska last February 1, at the same time Shuttle Columbia was landing is about to expose HAARP for the advanced defense/weapon system it is.


soundingcircle.com...

Missile shield gains support across globe
www.washingtontimes.com...

Science & Technology » could HARPP be an EMP defence shield?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 

Nice source.

A Palindromatic Meeting In The Middle, Outside of Time...
Sounding Circle implies the cycles, spirals and symbols of our thought, our culture, our lineage and our imagination

Only $1,100 a night to stay at the retreat. He claims that HAARP was a "complete operating anti-missle system" in 2003. You believe him. I see no reason to.

Aside from that and contrary to what he claims, National Security Presidential Directive 23 contains no specific directives about Poker Flat or HAARP. It's basically an update to the National Missile Defense Act of 1999.

Sounds kind of familiar actually. Reagan wanted to do something about the missle threat from the Soviet "evil empire". Big plans, not too practical though. Soviets gone, Bush was worried about other baddies so he said (waving his arms), "do something" (then shortly thereafter invaded Iraq). But unlike Reagan, there is no mention of a "shield". Probably because such a shield is not possible. Instead the NSPD is a directive to develop a mobile and adaptable system capable of responding to changing threats. "Yikes! They're over there now. Get those Aegis cruisers there on the double!" Permanent facilities are not useful in today's world (according to the NSPD).

The Defense Department plans to employ an evolutionary approach to the development and deployment of missile defenses to improve our defenses over time. The United States will not have a final, fixed missile defense architecture. Rather, we will deploy an initial set of capabilities that will evolve to meet the changing threat and to take advantage of technological developments. The composition of missile defenses, to include the number and location of systems deployed, will change over time.


Are you calling the interceptor missiles that are (maybe) at Poker Flat a "shield" now? That's kind of prosaic compared to the stuff you are talking about in the OP. Didn't you mention a:


planetary shield (for missile defense and solar radiation).
?

[edit on 10/4/2009 by Phage]



posted on Oct, 5 2009 @ 09:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 





"complete operating anti-missle system" in 2003. You believe him. I see no reason to.


Ionospheric monitoring is such an old technology the world governments may have had time to build a global missile defense system. Back in WW2 the German U boat communications from the Pacific bounced their signals off the ionosphere not only to increase the range of the signal, but also to secure the communication. The German receiver equipment of the day could determine the location of the U boat sending the signal based on where the signal bounced off the ionosphere.

In the 60's Arecibo was monitoring Russian missile sites easily since missile sites were marked by a particular radar activity signature. I'm sure over the last 50 years receivers have become much more sensitive and selective. Its unlikely any military target could remain unmonitored these days. Even underground facilities aren't very well hidden when you have satellites that can identify the Slichter triplet!

Its smarter to to identify military activity that might lead to a missile launch long before any missiles are actually launched. Once missiles are in the air it might be too late. Even third world countries can buy hardened guidance systems that rely on shielded ring laser gyros to find their target.



posted on Oct, 6 2009 @ 11:39 AM
link   
Well at least right now we all know that HAARP and OTHR is used for other purposes than what is stated


How would that inter-connect with other systems ?

I wont be relying upon the 'latest news' for that explanation which is force fed into the public conciseness... the official explanation is starting to get into the realms of " One day the Moon has a slight Atmosphere... the Next day it doesn't"


..and we all know from the US Navy publication 'From Sea to the Stars' that NASA was set up for worldwide propaganda value







posted on Oct, 6 2009 @ 02:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Somamech
 


During the cold war these ionospheric monitoring sites were cabled to military installations. Presumably if Mutually Assured Destruction had been the rule of the day, detection of a launch event would have triggered an immediate response. In those days the civil defense drills had the school children diving under their desks on a regular basis at the sound of the alarm.

There is a declassified tape available at the JFK library that is definitely worth listening too.

www.jfklibrary.org...



posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Hey Phage have you found them Plasma shields yet ?

My apologies Phage as I have been busy avoiding Obama destroying the known world


Zenjoy



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 11:56 AM
link   
Abstract

Experimental results from HF pumping experiments in the nightside auroral E and F region are reported. The experiments were carried out by the use of the EISCAT HF heating facility located near Tromsø, Norway, allowing HF pumping the ionosphere in a near magnetic field-aligned direction. We present experimental results from multi-instrument observations related to heater-induced phenomena in a coupled ionosphere–magnetosphere system. The following results have been observed on different occasions: a reverberation effect in scattered signals observed simultaneously on two diagnostic paths which is an indication of Alfvén wave generation. This phenomenon was seen under specific disturbed background geophysical conditions, namely, a high electron density in the F region up to 8 MHz produced by soft electron precipitation from the magnetosphere along with low electron density in lower ionosphere; increased ionospheric electric fields; ion outflows from the ionosphere. On another occasion a magnetospheric response to heater turning on and off was found from magnetic pulsation observations over a frequency range up to 5 Hz (the upper frequency limit of the sensitive magnetometer at Kilpisjarvi, located near Tromsø). The response manifests itself about 1 min after the heater is turned on and off. Other results have shown the modification of a natural auroral arc and local spiral-like formation. It is thought that a local heater-driven current system is formed. An interesting feature is the generation of the heater-induced ion outflows from the ionosphere. They are observed in night hours under both quiet and disturbed magnetic conditions.

www.sciencedirect.com... 166583963&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2f27e5cf8a8b9b7f51354245d3e53d0a

When the above abstract speaks of 'spiral-like formations', does it mean visual/optical, or just frequency/wave?
Thanks.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 12:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Somamech
 


So are you going to provide the drawer that your figures were aught upon or just brag about it some more??

I'm just curious as actually denying ignorance isn't asking someone to follow a daft lead.

In case there is any misunderstanding here; I am calling you a troll of the lowest order.

-m0r



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 02:01 PM
link   
Can someone who understands these ionospheric heaters better than me, explain to me about the abstract i posted. wherein it speaks of 'spiral-like' formations produced by these heaters at EISCAT, and whether or not these spirals are optical or just unseen frequencies?
Thanks.



posted on Jan, 28 2010 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by m0r1arty
reply to post by Somamech
 


So are you going to provide the drawer that your figures were aught upon or just brag about it some more??

I'm just curious as actually denying ignorance isn't asking someone to follow a daft lead.

In case there is any misunderstanding here; I am calling you a troll of the lowest order.

-m0r


Now hold on soldier


Do YOU, really need to know that seeing YOU DENY IGNORANCE ?




posted on Jan, 28 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Romans 10:9
 


They're unseen. HAARP doesn't have enough power to create anything visible.



posted on Jan, 28 2010 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by m0r1arty
reply to post by Somamech
 


So are you going to provide the drawer that your figures were aught upon or just brag about it some more??

I'm just curious as actually denying ignorance isn't asking someone to follow a daft lead.

In case there is any misunderstanding here; I am calling you a troll of the lowest order.

-m0r


There is NO mis-understanding on my part regarding what you called me, but in saying so we all have our days


I am not so sure what you want me to provide though ?



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 10:36 AM
link   
This is a really great post with so much information in one spot OP!

I realize it's old but I figured I'd post these documents on here anyway since some people probably saved this thread, and I saw that it was linked to another website with really good information on HAARP/EISCAT. I'd start my own post on the subject, but I know I'd go down in flames as I am an easy flammable target and I know how people take HAARP conspirators as believing everything is caused by HAARP in Alaska.

Well I don't believe that, because the EISCAT facility is more powerful so I think following their experiments give us more information into the capabilities of these arrays. I don't agree with all the conspiracies relating to this, but ever since the Norway spiral I've been researching into auroral effects from the heating experiments.

I've wanted to do what you have done in this post, or map them all out, etc, but I don't have the attention for it. So I decided to just specifically focus my attention on the auroral phenomenons that way if any more incidents like that spiral occur I'll be ready with information to back up my claims.

I believe the Norway spiral was a display of power or a display of how far they've come in their research. Possibly compared to ours (US) or maybe the US has the same powers but hasn't used them to the point where everyone would notice. So, I think the Norway spiral was a kind of "look what we can do" moment directed at the US since Obama and many other important figures were there that day. Even if the Norway spiral was just a missile, that doesn't change the fact that these heating experiments definitely can alter the natural aurora and generate "fake" emissions viewable to the eye.

So, in regards to the question of whether or not the heating of the ionosphere can create observable optical phenomenon in the first place, the answer is YES. Here are some links on the topic and a snippet of each, and these are old science research articles, so I'm sure they've come a long way in over a decade:

Tromso Experiment 1996 Auroral Spiral Observed

It should be pointed out that a most remarkable optical phenomenon was observed during the two heating cycles - A development of local spiral-like forms in the auroral arc near Tromso occurred after the heater was turned on. Furthermore, the brightening and subsequent break-up of an auroral arc at 21:33:50 UT took place above Tromso.

Creation of Visible Artificial Optical Emissions in the Aurora by High-power Radio Waves

Weak optical emissions have been produced for decades in such ionospheric ‘heating’ experiments, where they serve as key indicators of electron acceleration, thermal heating, and other effects of incompletely understood wave–particle interactions in the plasma under conditions difficult to replicate in the laboratory2. The extremely low intensities produced previously have, however, required sensitive instrumentation for detection, preventing applications beyond scientific research. Here we report observations of radio-induced optical emissions bright enough to be seen by the naked eye, and produced not in the quiet mid-latitude ionosphere, but in the midst of a pulsating natural aurora. This may open the door to visual applications of ionospheric heating technology or provide a way to probe the dynamics of the natural aurora and magnetosphere.

Artificial Airglow Excited by High-power Radio Waves

High-power electromagnetic waves beamed into the ionosphere from ground-based transmitters illuminate the night sky with enhanced airglow. The recent development of a new intensified, charge coupled-device imager made it possible to record optical emissions during ionospheric heating. Clouds of enhanced airglow are associated with large-scale plasma density cavities that are generated by the heater beam. Trapping and focusing of electromagnetic waves in these cavities produces accelerated electrons that collisionally excite oxygen atoms, which emit light at visible wavelengths. Convection of plasma across magnetic field lines is the primary source for horizontal motion of the cavities and the airglow enhancements. During ionospheric heating experiments, quasi-cyclic formation, convection, dissipation and reappearance of the cavites comprise a major source of long-term variability in plasma densities during ionospheric heating experiments.


Just my cents.
edit on 12/8/2010 by SpaceJ because: links



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 11:10 AM
link   
reply to post by SpaceJ
 


SpaceJ...Thanks for this new info....

you really should make a new thread about this.....

it is important.

i for one have been saying repeatedly that these experiments create spirals....but alas i was shot down in flames.

PLEASE make a new thread on this subject.

thanks

snoopyuk



posted on Dec, 8 2010 @ 11:14 AM
link   
reply to post by davesidious
 


it does say `optical `

i am sure that means it was visible.

snoopyuk





new topics

top topics



 
116
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join