why did all 3 buildings collapse straight down through the greatest path of resistance, straight down through thousands of tonnes of steel, instead of the most damaged floors tippling off like normal non-controlled demolitions?

the damage to building 7 was all concetrated to one side of the building (its in the NIST report!), why did the building collapse strait down then?

Even if by some miracle that the floors did buckle evenly throughout the whole floors so the buildings went straght down instead of tippling.... it would not happen at free fall speed. That is just redicilous to believe all the floors would buckle without resistance within a fraction of a second from eachother...

How can believers ignore so many things...

*Collapses straight down instead of tippling
*almost free fall speed
*explosions
*explosion witnesses
*countdown for building 7
*NIST saying they did not look for explosives because there were no indications for explosions (NIST has 7000 videos and 7000 pictures still under NDA, I would love to see those!)
*agency officials that lie so much that 9/11 commision considered sueing the officials
*Media that calls questioning the official story for conspiracy nuts (ad hominum attacks are used to attack the person so their arguments are made disbeliveable. This strategy truely only belong in the kindergarden)


quote right off of NIST's own web site.

"As part of the NCST Act, no part of any report resulting from investigations can be admitted as evidence or used in any suit or action for damages. Additionally, NIST employees are not permitted to serve as expert witnesses."

signed into law on Oct. 1, 2002, by President Bush

as in: anything NIST concludes is inadmissible in a court of law and makes it as good as hearsay.

Where is the official investigation then? Nowhere....


[edit on 4-10-2009 by conar]