|
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 07:51 PM by nunya13
|
Originally posted by calcoastseeker
That's okay, I like to rock and roll.
I always tell people that, as weird as it sounds, I actually miss Cali earthquakes. They were scary as hell when they happened, but I strangley miss
that.
Maybe it was the adrenaline rush.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 07:53 PM by mental modulator
|
I'm waiting Venus Rising - today is a good a day to die as any!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:07 PM by Karilla
|
Originally posted by nunya13
Originally posted by calcoastseeker
That's okay, I like to rock and roll.
I always tell people that, as weird as it sounds, I actually miss Cali earthquakes. They were scary as hell when they happened, but I strangley miss
that.
Maybe it was the adrenaline rush.
Well, sorry to say, but you might get your wish. Seismic activity has been increasing over the last century (up to 200% by some estimates).
Looky here.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:13 PM by RoofMonkey
|
Just an FYI
Fifty one years before the Great San Fransisco Earthquake (Mag 7.7 - 7.8), there was the Fort Tejon quake, Mag ~7.9. It ruptured the San Andreas Fault
for a length of about 225 miles (350 kilometers), between Parkfield and San Bernardino.
en.wikipedia.org...
From Science 10 July 2009:
Vol. 325. no. 5937, pp. 191 - 193
Nonvolcanic Tremor Evolution and the San Simeon and Parkfield, California, Earthquakes
Robert M. Nadeau and Aurélie Guilhem
Nonvolcanic tremors occur adjacent to locked faults and may be closely related to the generation of earthquakes. Monitoring of the San Andreas Fault
in the Parkfield, California, region revealed that after two strong earthquakes, tremor activity increased in a nearly dormant tremor zone, increased
and became periodic in a previously active zone, and has remained elevated and periodic for over 4 years.
...
The persistent changes in tremor suggest that stress is now accumulating more rapidly beneath this part of the San Andreas Fault, which
ruptured in the moment magnitude 7.8 Ft. Tejon earthquake of 1857.
[edit on 18-9-2009 by RoofMonkey]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:38 PM by above
|
so a failed prediction?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:43 PM by sticky
|
reply to post by above
Id say CA still has about an 18 hour window of true "new moon" left from now.
NOW:
(6:42 PM PDT 9/18)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:45 PM by sticky
|
Originally posted by Gixxer
aww with that much advanced warning i am sure the nutballs are feverishly trying to figure out how to claim that a major earthquake is just a false
flag created by the government.
We(nutballs) already can do this. HAARP
[edit on 18-9-2009 by sticky]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:50 PM by sdcigarpig
|
Well it is about 7 pm here in California, and last time I checked, there was 2 small, less than 3.0 on the scale that had happened. So I guess the
prediction did not pan out.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 08:52 PM by bl4ke360
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 10:28 PM by TruthParadox
|
Originally posted by whoshotJR
One time somebody told me that the moon also makes the tides here on earth. Isn't that silly? How could massive heavenly bodies with a huge
gravitational force have any baring on our planet? I bet the guy didn't even know the sun revolves around the earth, poor bastard.
Wow. I think you missed my point.
There is a reason the moon effects the tides on earth - you mentioned it yourself - gravity.
But there isn't a reason why, when Uranus is lined up with Saturn (or w/e the prediction says), a cataclysmic earthquake will occur.
The thing missing in this prediction (as with most I see on ATS) is a scientific bases - a reason.
But thanks for ignoring the whole point I was making...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-9-2009 @ 10:32 PM by newworld
|
8:30 PM where I am at in California.
nothing yet. I will safely assume (like I have assumed since the beginning) that this is another false prediction.
however, if for some reason an earthquake occurs in the few remaining hours of the day, I will be among the first to say "i was wrong. Prophesies of
this nature are accurate." anyway, so far this is one more of those phony predictions that appear so often in ATS.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 03:07 AM by TruthParadox
|
Originally posted by bl4ke360
Right, because 9/18 is over and everything.
It is now  .
It seems the only predictions that can be trusted are those that predict that baseless predictions will be proven inaccurate by the passage of
time.
As my DARE instructor once said: "Just say 'NO' to baseless predictions of impending doom."
At least I think that's what he said... I never really paid attention in school  .
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 03:39 AM by mental modulator
|
FAIL!!!!!
FAIL x's 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Venus rising my foot
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 04:27 AM by daddysreturn
|
well sorry to have to say this but my nan used to say tomorrow never comes so we'll never see this quake lol
but who nows ? 
[edit on 19-9-2009 by daddysreturn]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-9-2009 @ 11:52 AM by newworld
|
it's 9:51 AM. No earthquake occurred.
failed prediction, like all the other doom predictions.
I expect the 2012 predictions to have the same fate as this one.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-9-2009 @ 01:18 PM by RoofMonkey
|
Dunno....
7/3/2009 - Central Gulf of California - Cluster of quakes released about 4428.8 terajoules of energy.
8/3/2009 - Central Gulf of California and further North - Cluster of quakes released about 10,4574.0 terajoules of energy.
And just today... up in the Baja just south of California, a small cluster releases 199.4 terajoules of energy. No where near the amount that seems
to be creeping up the interface of the Pacific-North American plate, but still a significant energy release.
Not justifying the prediction, just pointing out the related data...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-9-2009 @ 01:36 PM by MightyAl
|
Earthquakes are never correctly predicted on the day that the planets and the sun line up. It usually happens a few days to a month later (or not at
all) - considering that today is Sept 21st.
It's going to be a crazy end of month. Nuclear attack on the US, terrorist attack in Germany...the most trustworthy thus far is the attack in Germany
around the end of this month.
I am still waiting for the superquake along the Ring of Fire, which could happen anywhere, even here in Taiwan. Could it be also happening this year
still?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-9-2009 @ 03:33 AM by thomas_
|
Originally posted by MightyAl
Earthquakes are never correctly predicted on the day that the planets and the sun line up. It usually happens a few days to a month later (or not at
all) - considering that today is Sept 21st.
It's going to be a crazy end of month. Nuclear attack on the US, terrorist attack in Germany...the most trustworthy thus far is the attack in Germany
around the end of this month.
I am still waiting for the superquake along the Ring of Fire, which could happen anywhere, even here in Taiwan. Could it be also happening this year
still?
All non-sense crap. People are waiting for and preaching the end of the world since humans realized that they would die one day (probably alone) and
the planet and others would remain. In other words, life would go on without them.
Living in constant fear waiting for # to happen isn't good for anyone.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |