It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Well, I woke up this morning and this was one of the first pieces of news I saw, and it made my day.
Any little effect that we had, as small as it may have been, on the removal of this fool, worked.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Obama Aide Van Jones Resigns After GOP Attacks
Ok so you do.
Pity... I sure don't. It doesn't resonate with me at all, no matter who is doing it.
I think it is the lowest form of politics there is.
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by MagicaRose
Sure he could still give Obama advice, but at least our tax dollars won't be going to support him an finance his filth.
Originally posted by RRconservative
How could you be a Jobs Czar, but have never previously created a single job in the first place?
Create jobs? Has he ever even HAD a job?
Why are we still without an objective definition of a green job?
Well, we still don't have a unified definition, and that's not unusual in a democracy. It takes a while for all the states and the federal government to come to some agreement. But the Department of Labor is working on it very diligently. Fundamentally, it's getting there, but we haven't crossed the finish line yet.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Czars aren't vetted...
The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
09/04/09 11:30 AM EDT
From a Nexis search a few moments ago:
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.
Oh Michelle finally finished her whoring coke binder and found time to write a book???
She is like a bratz doll come to life
My shoe is going to write a follow up, should be a good read
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by Helghast1
So do you support the political tactic of attacking an opponent at every action? non-stop? Even when it means being completely intellectually dishonest?