From
www.mailonsunday.co.uk (the listed source document):
It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be
triggered by the vaccine.
I looked up
Guillain-Barre Syndrome on Wikipedia and found this little tidbit:
GBS is a rare side-effect of influenza vaccines, with an incidence of about one case per million vaccinations. Other estimates suggest the
incidence of GBS among those receiving the vaccine was one case per 105,000 and that the GBS was not directly due to the vaccine but to its being
contaminated with a bacterium that triggers GBS.
*snip*
GBS is a form of autoimmune disorder with a delayed hypersensitivity reaction, or a rare manifestation of serum sickness, or transient syndrome
resembling serum sickness with loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, and stomach pain accompanied by weakness (tired feeling), chills, low grade fever
and possible evidence of brain involvement, indicated by lethargy and migraine headaches, although one theory of the cause of migraine is a central
nervous system (CNS) disorder, or Bickerstaff's brain stem encephalitis, a regional variant of GBS.
Hmmm....
Then I remember the thread
CDC and HHS may lift ban on HIV-Carrying Immagrants showing
up on ATS earlier today. So I looked it up and checked out the
article referenced. Sure enough, right there at the top
of the official document is this title:
42 CFR Part 34
Medical Examination of Aliens--Removal of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
(HIV) Infection From Definition of Communicable Disease of Public
Health Significance; Proposed Rule
All this amid the cries of Universal H1N1 Armageddon. All this amid dries for mandatory injections.
Then I remember back to a mere few months ago when the cries were not over H1N1, but over H1N5... anyone remember the bird flu? You know, the one that
has yet to become a pandemic or even a localized epidemic?
I am seeing a pattern here. Society has evolved along the lines that certain powers wish it to evolve. I have spoken many times of the innumerable
cases I have personally seen where over-medication and improper medication
by doctors were the direct cause of the death of an extended family
member. Yes, we have turned into a society that will pop anything into ourselves as long as the good all-knowing doctor says we should. When we see
deaths caused by this attitude, the same excuse seems to always surface: "
He must have needed more/better medical care than he got".
Bull-pockets!
Humanity has lasted a long long time on this planet, without the intervention of doctors and modern medicines and technology. these simply did not
exist for the vast vast majority of our existence as a species. The media and the government, not to mention the AMA, would love for us to believe
that doctors and doctors alone can give life. What was once a rare occurrence has today become a ritual that increases in intensity with age: the trip
to the doctor. Today we are expected to have an annual check-up, periodic tests run, and to use over-the counter medicines lavishly. Should all this
not place us in the prime of health (which would be hard to accomplish, since many of those over-the-counter medicines are actually toxic at the
maximum recommended level), we must instead begin a life-long regiment of regular trips to the doctor, with intervals ranging from 6 months to once a
week. We must do this because since the over-the-counter medicines have not made us perfect, it is obvious that stronger medicines are required.
Bull-pockets!
There are plenty of rumors about holistic and unconventional cures for the diseases that plague our society most. One I remember is Dichloroacetate
salts for cancer. When taken in recommended amounts, they are safe as has been proven by years of use to treat other ailments, and there is strong
evidence that dichloroacetate salts will cure cancer completely. But no doctor will prescribe them. Why? Because they
cure people, which
affects the amount of patients paying big bucks to insurance companies who in turn pay big bucks to the doctors to keep treating the illness. The
illness makes money; a cure does not.
Now back to the articles I referenced earlier. We are being told daily through TV and radio and newspapers how important it is to get not just one,
but three flu shots this year. Now we find out this shots can have an autoimmune side effect. We were told when AIDS and HIV came out that we were not
to be alarmed; it would be wrong to go so far as to quarantine someone for such an illness, or even to restrict who they could contaminate. Now we
find that the CDC itself is recommending that HIV is no problem should it be spread in the US. Bear in mind that HIV is also an autoimmune virus.
That phrase 'auto-immune' seems to be the common thread here. It refers to a debilitation of the immunity system, the first defense any life-form
has to illness and disease. Ask anyone who has watched someone die with full-blown AIDS: any little contaminant, even a mild cold, becomes deadly.
That's what happens when the immune system fails. We die. Painfully and horribly.
For many years I have heard that the population was to be whittled down to what I always considered an absurd level. I used to scoff at it. Now I am
giving that rumor some serious consideration. What better way to whittle out the weak and defenseless and therefore useless members of society than to
begin systematically destroying the immunity of those in society? And what better way to make absolutely sure that those who remain will be good
little servants than to have control over whether they live or die, in the form of their medical care which is now necessary for survival thanks to
these autoimmune agents?
Sure, you will have the freedom of speech. Just don't say anything wrong, or you will be the victim of a computer error and you won't get to see the
doctor or refill your meds this month. They'll have it fixed by next month though, just in time for your funeral.
Sure, you have freedom of religion. Just don't believe anything that is unpopular because if you do, you might find you don't have health care
thanks to a bureaucratic error.
Sure, you can have a firearm. Oh, did we mention that is considered an unhealthy act, so that medicine you need that is in short supply would be
better spent on someone who is not acting in an unhealthy manner. Sorry.
Check your e-mail box:
Our records indicate that you have missed three days of work in the last year. As clearly stated in your work contract, the
maximum days which can be missed are two per year. Your medical coverage is therefore revoked until you have the maximum allotted two days absenteeism
within the previous year.
The only thing standing in the way of this right now in the US is that pesky little thing about patient's rights to refuse medical care. Without
giving them the poison to make them dependent on the system, the above scenario cannot occur. So now we need nationalized health care to make sure
that everyone takes their poison so we can save them later.... as long as they do as they are told. You notice the thread recently about the Congress
and the White House being exempt from the nationalized health care proposal? Of course they are! If you want to poison your enemy, you must make sure
you drink from different glasses!
Sorry if it sounds like I am hijacking your thread here, but I just put 2 and 2 and 2 and 2 together and it didn't make 8.
TheRedneck
