It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by joe82
He has the right to feel and say what he wants, he's not alone in feeling this.
A white person says something like this and he losses sponsers and is called a racist but if a black person says this about white people, they're called a hero, anybody else find something wrong about this.
I'm no racist, far from it but because of what I said some people will label me that way, that just proves the point I'm trying to make.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
You know I just thought of something.
It's possible to play the race card without being racist.
Perhaps that's what happened here. I still think it's political pandering. But it doesn't have to be racist.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by kinda kurious
Good point KK...I didn't realize he tried to re-enforce what he said the day after!
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by kinda kurious
I don't think obama is racist at all. Where did Beck get it from?
I think Beck interpreted taxing the rich as taxing whites, which in and of itself is racist.
Anyway, he's not always wrong, but what would you expect?
but I'll be sure to avoid Procter and Gamble products
Originally posted by kinda kurious
It doesn't necessarily require a WH Press Secretary to suggest that turning down the rhetoric makes sense. Like it or not, broadcast and cable news outlets are funded from advertiser dollars based on ratings. I commend these fine companies who have chosen decency over racism.
I suspect Rush, Hannity et al might soon learn the same lesson.
www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 8-8-2009 by kinda kurious]
Originally posted by CharlesMartel
reply to post by kinda kurious
The clip is obviously trimmed for sensationalism (ie selectively edited). How can people ask "Why would he say such things?" When from the editing you can tell that he was explaining why he reached his conclusions, but they were edited out, to make it look like he was being the racist rather than Obama being the racist.
If Obama isn't a racist, why would he say, that he don't have all the facts yet, but the cops behaved stupidly in a situation where the cop was white and a black man was arrested? A non-racist person would have said, "We don't have all the facts." Period, end of sentence, no further comment or sticking his foot in his mouth.