It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...why, suddenly, after so many other opportunities to take these photos...
Originally posted by warrenb
Will the photos be made public before or after they are photoshoped to remove anomalies?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The current mission LRO/LCROSS is, among other things, intended to get some more accurate imaging, especially at the South Pole, for future manned mission planning. Since this camera, as a result of its main mission, has sufficient resolution to pick up smaller objects, like the Descent Stages left there, it is a great opportunity to get pictures of them as it orbits past.
Imaging capablity is somewhere under one meter/pixel...maybe as small as 30-50 cm/pixel. That's just a rough guess, will depend on factors...for intance, photos taken when the Sun is low on the Lunar horizon will result in large, long shadows.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The USA (NASA) have not publicly been back because of resources (money) focusing on LEO manned missions, and robotic exploration of other portions of the Solar System.
Originally posted by Phage
My goodness, Richard seems to think very highly of himself. The whole moon landing hoax conspiracy theory was created because of him?
Originally posted by Kevin_X2
so, now their listening to us and taking action to refute our claims? i thought we were just wackos?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
I think they would be better off taking photographs of the shard in the SW area of Siniu Medii. I'd rather have a close look at that, or the object supposedly investigated by Apollo 20 than the Apollo landing sites.
Elsie and Frances remained tight-lipped until 17th February 1983 when Elsie admitted in a letter of confession that the photographs were a hoax, claiming that they had drawn the fairies, cut them out and fastened them to the ground with hatpins. So that was that! Or was it? The mystery still lives on with many people still believing that the Cottingley fairies existed.
On July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin became the first men to walk on the moon. The following speech, revealed in 1999, was prepared by Nixon's then speechwriter, William Safire, to be used in the event of a disaster that would maroon the astronauts on the moon:
"Fate has ordained that the men who went to the moon to explore in peace will stay on the moon to rest in peace. These brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, know that there is no hope for their recovery. But they also know that there is hope for mankind in their sacrifice. These two men are laying down their lives in mankind's most noble goal: the search for truth and understanding. They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by their nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by a Mother Earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown. ...."
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Kevin_X2
so, now their listening to us and taking action to refute our claims? i thought we were just wackos?
The fact that NASA is here at ATS listening is a fact. I can prove it and ArMaP can back that up... "The case of the vanishing directory" Happened while ArMaP was in the middle of d/ling an image.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I don't really need convincing that they went, I think they did. What I want to know is who told them not to go back for 50 years...
Originally posted by zorgon
For anyone wanting to know when it passes over the Apollo sites here is the live location tracking
lroc.sese.asu.edu...
Originally posted by Terrapop
reply to post by Wildbob77
I agree, with the help of CGI available to NASA today... they can produce every evidence they need artificially.
And nobody will be able to debunk this "real" fresh new evidence.
BUT...
interesting that they even consider to do something like this...
Are the "conspiracy" rumors getting to loud at to many places on the internet already?
[edit on 8-7-2009 by Terrapop]
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
While it will no doubt not convince the conspiracy-believers in any way it will help to further marginalize them by exposing the amount of special-pleading and closed-mindedness they employ to cling to their belief. This thread is already full of it and it is laughable.