It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yiersan
Ps. As for the fabricated terror attacks in NY and the invasions of countries using the Muslim fundamentalists as a scapegoat, let's not even discuss about those jokes (or should I say crimes) over here?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Chinese authorities say the Xinjiang separatists are terrorists with links to al-Qaeda and receive support from outside the country.
So the CIA is trying to create chaos in China... interesting.
Did you read somewhere else that the CIA played a role, or does that just seem like a logical assumption?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Once again you're too emotional. Calm down...
I won’t bother wading through all the ranting and raving.
Let me ask you a question?
Is China above scrutiny? Why is it when somebody posts their views about China that it becomes something that has to be attacked? Did I ever state that the communist government was "EVIL"? By trying to put words into my mouth you are just demonstrating your lack of credibility. So you attack those who LOOK at the situation.
I don’t know... We in the west are only getting one view of the situation really and that's whatever we can get from the Chinese Media.
I see criticism of the US all day long every day. Hell I'm one of the biggest critics of my country. I hear criticism about the US also all day everyday by people from around the world. It doesn’t bother me really it makes me look at my own Government. Do you do the same? Are you afraid to consider your Government may be wrong or has made a mistake?
Well if you cannot answer those questions then we have nothing further to discuss.
nobody asked you to shut up, feel free to continue your opinions, but dig a bit deeper in the roots and causes for the current days violences. You can maybe start by hearing both sides of the stories.
By the way I'll still continue to post what I want when I want as long as it doesn’t violate the T&C of this site.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by yiersan
Ps. As for the fabricated terror attacks in NY and the invasions of countries using the Muslim fundamentalists as a scapegoat, let's not even discuss about those jokes (or should I say crimes) over here?
I see this sort of terminology thrown around on ATS a lot, but I've yet to see any backup for the "Illegal Iraq War" or "Criminal Iraq War" claims.
Can someone please cite me the statutory authority for the claim that the Iraq War is "illegal" or "criminal", and the jurisdictional authority that gives legitimacy to the statutes?
Thanks, I'll wait.
Originally posted by star in a jar
So can anyone tell me if ordinary Chinese have access to ATS or is it just the government approved ones?
The Uighurs simply don't want to live under China, living like the Chinese, working like the Chinese, living by the Chinese ways. bowing down to the Chinese Hans. So what if they're Muslim? They just don't like the way China does things! That's it!
I'm rooting for the Uighurs, I'm sad though for the men who got arrested. They will never be seen again.
Originally posted by yiersan
Originally posted by yiersan
Ps. As for the fabricated terror attacks in NY and the invasions of countries using the Muslim fundamentalists as a scapegoat, let's not even discuss about those jokes (or should I say crimes) over here?
Nothing is illegal in warfare, anything brought forward are merely the human community who imposed some more "human" games rules. So even invading other countries is your good own rights to do, you are stronger than the other, innit?
The problem is within the hypocrisy and lies to start these wars. If you go for encircling China/Russia, go for the oil etc etc etc, just say so, and don't BS the world community about WMD or trying to give the impression you care about those civilians in those nations.
USA: en.wikipedia.org...
UK: www.publicwhip.org.uk...
I have said enough abt this topic in this thread abt hypocrits
[edit on 8-7-2009 by yiersan]
In the 2nd century BC, Han China sent Zhang Qian as an envoy to the states in the region, beginning several decades of struggle between the Xiongnu and Han China over dominance of the region, eventually ending in Chinese success.
China and Russia are both pretty large places. I'm not at all sure if they CAN be encircled. but that still wouldn't be illegal even if we could, unless we did it on their soil, would it?
[edit on 2009/7/8 by nenothtu]
China’s drive to develop Xinjiang’s resources has spurred an influx of migrants and bred resentment among Uighurs, who complain of discrimination and political and cultural repression. Han Chinese now account for half the province’s 21 million population, from 7 percent in the 1953 census.
Originally posted by yiersan
China and Russia are both pretty large places. I'm not at all sure if they CAN be encircled. but that still wouldn't be illegal even if we could, unless we did it on their soil, would it?
[edit on 2009/7/8 by nenothtu]
It is being encircled.
Russia:
To her West - the NATO is expanding far into Eastern Europe.
To her South - invaded Afghanistan, Iraq, bribing puppet nations like Georgia/Turkey and Central Asia.
To her East - Having permanent stations in Japan/Korea. Incl your own bought state Alaska and the whole pacific mighty navy
To her North - The Arctic, with your own Allies.
China:
To our East - Same as Russian issues
To our South East - the key in the Pacific "Islands" keychain of encirclement Taiwan.
To our South - From Philippines to India
**Note** the Pacific island keychain is from Korea pensinula, Japan, taiwan, to Philippines, Malaysia etc.
To our West - kinda same as Russia's south.
Finishing off Iran will complete the circle - The question is more like when will it happen? rather then IF it will happen.
And next to this creating turmoil inside Russia and China are other tactics to be used.
And yes, just do it. This is also why Russia would simply chase away the CIA agents in Georgia and so when required to do. Not illegal either, innit?
[edit on 8-7-2009 by yiersan]
BEIJING — Chinese police killed 12 people during July 5 rioting in the western city of Urumqi, a senior official said — a rare acknowledgment by the government that security forces opened fire in the worst ethnic clashes to hit the region in decades.
The unrest began when a peaceful protest by Muslim ethnic minority Uighurs turned violent after it was stopped by police. The Uighurs went on a rampage, smashing windows, burning cars and beating Han Chinese, the nation's dominant ethnic group.
Two days after the first rioting, vigilante groups of ethnic Han took to the streets and attacked Uighurs.
URUMQI, China — The Chinese government has acknowledged for the first time that police killed 12 people during July 5 unrest in western China but put the blame squarely on rioters, saying they stockpiled weapons and planned synchronized attacks on targets across the city of Urumqi.
But an expert on the situation in Xinjiang province said such accusations should be treated with skepticism because they are Beijing's attempt to distract people from the real issues upsetting ethnic minority Muslim Uighurs in the region.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Are you serious when you say that the Muslim minorities in China are ................ why are these Muslims special?
Moreover, in accordance with PRC's affirmative action policies towards ethnic minorities, all non-Han ethnic groups are subjected to different rules and are usually allowed to have two children in urban areas, and three or four in rural areas. Han Chinese living in rural areas, also, are often permitted to have two children.[20] Because of couples such as these, as well as urban couples who simply pay a fine (or "social maintenance fee") to have more children,[21] the overall fertility rate of mainland China is, in fact, closer to two children per family than to one child per family (1.8). The steepest drop in fertility occurred in the 1970s before one child per family was implemented in 1979. This is due to the fact that population policies and campaigns have been ongoing in China since the 1950s. During the 1970s, a campaign of 'One is good, two is okay and three is too many' was heavily promoted.[citation needed]
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
reply to post by yiersan
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing that information. I was unaware that the Chinese government had a similar policy of minority appeasement...or no one.
Islam is an extremely intolerant religion. The only way to adapt Muslims to ............. It creates inequality and instability.
I do hope the Chinese resist this sort of nonsense, and do not allow ...... life and the social system in the country.
And I know all about the foreign investors sending their manufacturing over to China. It benefits no one. I've lost a job because factory operations were being sent to China, where the labor was a fraction of minimum wage in the US was. So someone in China is now doing my old job, but is that person doing any better for it? Unlikely, because the wages that person are getting paid probably are not enough to live decently on. The only people who benefit are the wealthy corporations.
Originally posted by Bachfin
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Chinese authorities say the Xinjiang separatists are terrorists with links to al-Qaeda and receive support from outside the country.
So the CIA is trying to create chaos in China... interesting.
Did you read somewhere else that the CIA played a role, or does that just seem like a logical assumption?
I thought it was just common knowledge that the CIA is al-Qaeda? even the CIA say so.
CIA is Al-Qaeda...