I don't believe the officer was aiming for her head however, I wouldn't condone the tazing on any part of her at all unless she was a physical
threat to the officer and I just don't see that happening without a weapon. I mean, come on! She is 14. His actions are simply not justified.
Tazers are like batons to the officers, just easier to use and because they are getting away with it, we are seeing many many unnecessary tazings.
That said. . . I now have these comments based my own experience, having been a juvenile probation officer at one time.
After about a year in the profession, given the choice, I would choose 10 male gang-bangers on my caseload rather than a single 14 year old female
sitting there with her arms crossed and rolling her eyes. They can be the most obstinate and disrespectful creatures on earth. They think they know
everything, but have extremely poor judgement and engage in extremely high risk behavior. Without serious and consistent intervention, they most
likely will make decisions that will affect them lifelong.
First of all, I can guarantee you, if the mother brought her to the police station for help, the child was a serious behavior problem and the mother
was trying to control her. I would bet it wasn't the first time and won't be the last.
Second, for the officer to have been chasing her at all, means the mother complained immediately that her daughter had run away, thus his pursuit. A
reasonable person would have radioed for backup, reported her direction and made reasonable attempts to apprehend her. She did run and she did evade
the officer. Those are two charges for which she should be referred to the juvenile probation department.
The officer made a bad choice in using the tazer and probably will be sued. In fact, had he tazed her in any other way, he probably still would be
facing a lawsuit. If the girl survives the surgery without any serious consequences, her lack of judgement isn't likely to change anytime soon,
especially if the parents sue.




