14 YO girl shot in head with a taser!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 11:03 PM by suzque66
Did I see on this thread that she was resisting arrest?? therefore she deserved it?

What have you all become that a parent dragging you to a police station for discipline is a good idea? Furthermore, when did it become an offense to walk / run away from such authority that had no official charges of criminal activity to begin with? A teen has the right to walk away at that age from a parent, not to mention from the police that she had no liability to remain with.

I am tired, but I hope this thread improves by morning into some realistic non-police-state posters who believe that a teen (child) has the right to defy authority because that authority has no right to hold them (even a parent).

Get real, this kid could have and would have run into a park by her own free will and come out the other side with a plan to find a friend for a place to crash or even to call her parents. Blame the kid?? Are you insane??? How many of us in our lifetime have been distracted and almost walked into traffic?? What if you were in panic mode and did the same...does that give a cop the right to taser you after the fact knowing full well that HE was the unfounded cause of your panic?? I think NOT.

edit: when will your country realize that 'suing' anyone who steps on your toes is a means to collect justice???? Tossing a few bucks? at the life of MY child would be unheard of. This cop is a criminal and should be tried as a criminal. Stop putting money in place of the value of a human life, seriously, it is sick! Another reason why other countries mock your country., it is sick.

[edit on 4-7-2009 by suzque66]

seriously unless my child comitted a murder, I wouldn't drag them to a police station, even then, that is the toughest decision a parent has to make. But over a cellphone discussion? Seriously, that is deranged.

[edit on 4-7-2009 by suzque66]


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 11:10 PM by marg6043
reply to post by resistor



I agree with you the "running into traffic" is obviously the excuse for this "officers" assault on the girl.

Hum, a foreign object on the head of a 14 year old that required surgery to be removed? hum, I think that a law sue will be the best approach for this one, no really on the police but on the manufacturer of the taser for safety reasons.

Tasers kill and it have been prof of it, over and over again.



[edit on 4-7-2009 by marg6043]


reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 08:16 AM by DaddyBare
This is an update that was posted to the local news message boards by someone claiming to live there and knows the family and officer involved?
I cant say this 100% true how can you be with a BBS posting but for what its worth here it is...
July 4, 2009
NEVER Go to the Police for ‘Help’…
Posted by William Grigg on July 4, 2009 06:52 PM | Post a civil, substantive, and intelligent comment
… with a domestic problem, unless your intention is for potentially fatal harm to come to you or the relative with whom you’re having trouble.

A 14-year-old girl from Tucumcari, New Mexico wound up in the hospital with a Taser dart embedded in her skull after her mother, Stacy Akin, took her to the police department because the two of them had been fighting, reports the Portales News-Tribune.

After Akin drove to the police station, the teenager, who suffers from epilepsy, quite sensibly decided that it would be foolish to seek “help” from the police and walked away from the facility. No mention is made of the youngster being under arrest, so there was no reason at all for the police to pursue her as if she were a criminal.

Nonetheless, a call was sent out saying that a girl had “run off” from the station. Police Chief Roger Hatcher responded, tracking the teen down at nearby George Molinas Park. When he called to her, the young lady — perhaps recalling parental advice against accepting rides from creepy strangers — ran away.

Hatcher briefly gave pursuit on foot. But chasing down a fleet-footed teenager is hard. So Hatcher pulled out his Taser and shot the youngster in the head.

“She committed a delinquent act,” sniveled the tax-feeder to the press.“She was running from police across traffic without looking.” If he’d been able to grab and tackle her, Hatcher continued, he would have done so, since there “was a lawful reason to do that.”

Actually, there wasn’t: The girl was not a criminal suspect, she had not been taken into custody, and the only lawful course of action on Hatcher’s part would have been to make sure that the girl wasn’t critically injured by traffic when she ran away from him.

So after waddling after the terrified girl for a few yards, Hatcher ordered her to stop and “then did what I had to do”— meaning that he shot her in the head with a reliably lethal instrument of electro-shock torture.

The assailant, who insists that things could have been “worse” had he not shot the girl in the head,“plans to refer the case to the Juvenile Probation Office … for possible charges,” reports the paper.

If he succeeds in saddling his victim with criminal charges, Mr. Hatcher will surely deserve to be horsewhipped.

Stacy Akin, whose idea it was to seek police intervention, was horrified by the result.

“One of the darts entered her skull,” she observed. A CAT scan disclosed that the implement had actually entered “her brain a little bit, but not much.” Not surprisingly, the girl remains hospitalized at Albuquerque’s University of New Mexico hospital.

Apart from offering a redundant illustration of the eagerness of our “protectors” to use lethal force against the innocent, this episode offers a critical object lesson: Never, never, never, in saecula saeculorum, go to the police for “help.”



reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 11:53 AM by richierich
The saed fact is this: Today MOST cops will not tolerate losing to a civilian in any w3ay...it damages their paper thin ego system too much. To disobey an ' order' even an obviously illegal one, is reason enough for most of these sick scum to use force, even deadly force, to get compliance for even the most minor and mundane' offenses'...like refusing to obey some petty order.

The fat cop simply could not catch her, and would not suffer the humiliation he imagined in his warped psyche would occur had she gotten away. So, he shot her; he would hqave shot her in the head with his gun but even he knew he could not get away with that; so he shoots her in the head with a Tazer.

Now she lies in critical condition. The cop swaggers around like some twisted psychopath bragging about how he ' saved her' from the harm of a non-existent car. He said she just didn't look; so the position of her head gave him license to shoot her? The fact that she may have run some minor risk, still unproven..is enough cause to shoot her? No way.

O course the cop groupies will rush in and come up with far fetched and unproven scenarios to try and justify this madness. There are some people so intimidated by cops that they will tolerate anything...any kind of abuse, as long as a cop did it. They always find some way, no matter how untrue, to show that the victim is better off shot in the head than allowed to go her way and be approached later.

The girl had a serious disability, and the shock alone could send her into convulsions that could kill her. the the barb in her BRAIN...sure..just a LITTLE into her brain!! If it was YOUR brain a little would be way too much. but because the girl was dragged to a cop station by her hysterical Mom, who should NEVER had taken her to a cop for an intelligent solution.

If the girl was a problem, there are ways to deal with it; never go to a cop for real help. Go to an agency that doesn't shoot it clients in the head for walking out of a meeting.

The girl was NOT under arrest, was NOT a danger to herself ( if not pursued) and had every right to walk away from the cop. A cop MUST have reasonable grounds to believe a CRIME has ben committed BEFORE he can detain a citizen for ' questioning'. WeNEVER have to answer any questions from a cop. So they have no right to detain us for questioning we refuse to submit to. It is that simple. the cop is wrong and should be fired and sued and then charged criminally and sent to prison.

Then maybe he will use better judgement in the future. The only thing bad cops know is force and to get locked up themselves, and that is what this moron deserves.



reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 02:21 PM by DaddyBare
reply to post by badw0lf



Thanks for the link... I remembered this case "originally charged with 143 counts of child molestation reached a deal with prosecutors and pleaded no contest to seven counts " that was just year before last right?

I pondered over the wisdom of adding this tidbit, as I didnt see a real connection.... but I did wonder if this girl maybe looked a little like the girl who got his brother in trouble?


reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 04:14 PM by apacheman
reply to post by badw0lf



Apparently the story's been pulled...link doesn't work. Has the sheriif just broken the law by forcing the paper to pull it, or did the paper do it as a favor, which makes it a conspiracy?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 2 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 40 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.