It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by westlink
wow, just wow... I just spent the last hour reading this thred and must say, Kapyong you know your stuff! I am completely amazed at the total lack of common sense it takes for some of these people to get a simple concept.
I also understand what you mean that is so elusive to grasp for some of these people... For someone to be as big of an icon as to be a founder of a religion (and preach AGAINST religion) and not one person save and protect atleast ONE piece of eye-witness evidence to his existance...Or a book written by him perhaps? That is unless the people in those days thought he was a nutter for claiming to be the son of God, well, I suppose thats another story...
People can believe what they want, I can.
Originally posted by Kapyong
Gday,
There's your problem -
You need to understand what 1 Cor 15:8 says before stating false claims like that.
It has NOTHING about Paul meeting a historical Jesus - probably why you failed to quote it :
"...and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born"
The Risen Christ APPEARED to Paul in a vision, YEARS after the alleged crucifixion.
Do you really seriously claim this refers to a historical Jesus?
Because that's not what Christians generally believe at all.
thanks,
K.
Originally posted by Kapyong
Yes, it appears I do know something you don't.
The fact that modern NT scholars agree they are all forgeries.
K.
There are passages relevant to Christianity in the works of four major non-Christian writers of the late 1st and early 2nd centuries – Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny the Younger.
However, these are generally references to early Christians rather than a historical Jesus. Of the four, Josephus' writings, which document John the Baptist, James the Just, and Jesus, are of the most interest to scholars dealing with the historicity of Jesus (see below). Tacitus, in his Annals written c. 115, mentions Christus, without many historical details (see also: Tacitus on Jesus). There is an obscure reference to a Jewish leader called "Chrestus" in Suetonius. (According to Suetonius, chapter 25, there occurred in Rome, during the reign of emperor Claudius (circa AD 50), "persistent disturbances ... at the instigation of Chrestus". Gnosis.org Mention in Acts of "After this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. There he met a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who had recently come from Italy with his wife Priscilla, because Claudius had ordered all the Jews to leave Rome." (Acts of the Apostles 18:1-2) has been conjectured to refer to the expulsion at the times of these "persistent disturbances".
Originally posted by texastig
Originally posted by Kapyong
Yes, it appears I do know something you don't.
The fact that modern NT scholars agree they are all forgeries.
K.
Do you have a reference for that?
Originally posted by gncnew
There are passages relevant to Christianity in the works of four major non-Christian writers of the late 1st and early 2nd centuries – Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Pliny the Younger.
Originally posted by Roark
Later reports DO constitute historical evidence, kapyong.
Originally posted by Roark
Not all evidence needs to be written and contemporary for it to be valid.
Originally posted by Roark
Especially considering the oral tradition of record-keeping amongst the ancient Jews.
Originally posted by Roark
You seem to think that the Jews were all literate and had access to writing materials, and that the absence of this constitutes an absence of Jesus Christ altogether. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater! That is a faulty methodology, and is not how true scholarship works.
Originally posted by Roark
The vast majority of historians accept that there was a person in history called Jesus Christ, who is the founder of Christian religion. You don't.
Originally posted by Roark
I certainly know who I would tend to believe...
Originally posted by Donnie Darko
I don't think a person who was made up could have that kind of influence.
Who claimed to have met a historical Jesus ?
Originally posted by texastig
Saul was alive when Jesus was alive.
Originally posted by texastig
Paul received this creed within five-six years of the crucifixion. Paul verified this creed twice with eyewitnesses, Peter, John and James, in Galatians 1:11-24 and Galatians 2:1-10.
Originally posted by zaiger
so
Who claimed to have met a historical Jesus ?
Many people but ...
Originally posted by gncnew
reply to post by Kapyong
K:
If you're looking for some kind of water tight evidence of a historical figure from back in a time where roughly 75% of the people were illiterate I think you're being a little obtuse.
Originally posted by gncnew
We could find holes in just about every historical character from 2000 years ago if we tried. Especially one that was as nomadic as Jesus.