Tanks Rolling into Tehran, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 73 times


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:19 PM by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by john124



My thoughts are it could be easily achieved.....Just do it. But look what happened when we cut off N. Korea.

The people suffer so terribly......

Nobody wants to see that happen.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:21 PM by john124
Originally posted by dallas18
twitter #iranelection the tanks haven't been confirmed yet and people are saying it appears to be a govt rumour


Yes now says unconfirmed but half an hour ago said confirmed. Strange. Could be regime spies saying that, but don't know either way.

Have a source saying army commanders back Rafsanjani:

eldercato.wordpress.com...

"Top army commanders are reported to have pledged loyalty to Rafsanjani. This is unconfirmed, but if true would be a significant development and monumentous blow to the Khamenei led government."

Hmmm is it possible these tanks support the people or are there no tanks. V. strange for it to be confirmed by several reliable sources and later unconfirmed. Just have to wait and see.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:22 PM by SLAYER69
The consequences of engaging Iran
The White House has so far resisted calls to speak out more forcefully in support of Iranian demonstrators and shelve plans for a dialogue with Iran's leadership.




reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:23 PM by David9176
reply to post by SLAYER69





The White House has so far resisted calls to speak out more forcefully in support of Iranian demonstrators and shelve plans for a dialogue with Iran's leadership


This is a smart move. It wouldn't look all that great if the protests in Iran completely fail and we are left with an Iranian government that we just hoped would be overthrown.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:26 PM by john124
Originally posted by David9176
reply to
post by SLAYER69





The White House has so far resisted calls to speak out more forcefully in support of Iranian demonstrators and shelve plans for a dialogue with Iran's leadership


This is a smart move. It wouldn't look all that great if the protests in Iran completely fail and we are left with an Iranian government that we just hoped would be overthrown.


Hmm but Obama wants fruitful dialogue, and we've seen the regime lying repeatedly over the past week. On newsnight Henry Kissinger said the other night that Obama would have to go for regime change if Khamenei stayed in power.


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:28 PM by dallas18
reply to post by brokenheadphonez



Joe Biden, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, has told Americans to expect a “major international crisis” that will present an early test of a Barack Obama administration. His comments were seized upon by the Republican campaign yesterday to raise fresh doubts about the prepared-ness of Mr Obama to be commander-in-chief. Speaking at a fundraiser in Seattle on Sunday night, Mr Biden said: “Mark my words, it will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here . . . we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.” He cited Russia and the Middle East as possible places that may cause problems, as well as the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan – “crawling with al-Qaeda” – as being of particular concern. Mr Obama would need help and support, Mr Biden suggested, “because it’s not gonna be apparent, initially, that we’re right.” He then spotted the media in the room, “I probably shouldn’t have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here.”


www.timesonline.co.uk...


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:31 PM by dallas18
reply to post by SLAYER69



hmm sounds similar to the whole Iraq situation, give the people a proper working government

i feel that they have learnt the lesson from iraq, as to not just go in on their own accord

perhaps they will use the media as a tool to get the people of america/ the world to pressure government intervention in iran to give the iran people a 'proper working government'


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:33 PM by David9176
reply to post by Night Watchman





What have you to say now as your heroes are murdering innocent Iranians in the street?


What do you have to say about Egypt and Saudi Arabia's government who oppress and kill their own citizens?

How about any country that does this for that matter...those who CAN'T EVEN VOTE...let alone have a fraudulent election.

No one supports the deaths of innocent people....but I do not support intervening in another country's business...

....it seems like that has gotten us into trouble in the past


reply posted on 20-6-2009 @ 08:35 PM by MegaCurious
reply to post by john124



Too bad John Titor didn't seem to think there was going to be revolution in Iran with rose pedals..

So I'm going to have to say that Ahmadinejad has the upper hand here.

With folks around the world wanting to strike Iran for building a nuclear power plant, which they would need in order to feed their growing population, you would think some Iranians would stand in solidarity with their government? Unless the U.S. in some way was able to bring about all of this?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags