posted on Jun, 13 2009 @ 08:30 PM
i always thought it was ferman and the LA police. the 2 victims were into drugs.
what if the LA police were supplying goldman and brown,had a run in over money and told nicole to go to OJ and get the money or they would kill them
and take OJ down too.
the bloody socks were not there in the first photographs.they showed up after OJ was out of town and on the flight.
the blood found in the car was LESS than a drop. this was contributed to blood that had dried on thurmans foot at the crime scene. remember how they
"botched" that? it was proven that the sprinkler system came on while he was searching the bronco. hence making it wet again.
ferman had a sample of OJ's blood when the evidence gathering was going on,and the blood that was found that matched OJ's was 2 weeks old,was n't
seen in the initial crime scene investigation,yet carried enough dna to be analyzed. remember? it was suddenly found on the back gate...how
but the one thing that has always puzzled me.
how do you kill 2 people, by yourself? with a knife?
whie you're killing 1 isn't the other screaming his or head off?
if you are receiving "teaser" wounds,do you stay silent?
imagine standing there waiting to be killed?!?!?!? quietly???
what would you do? wouldn't you run for help...no matter who you were?
someone had to hold the second victim. maybe thats why the witness heard voices instead of screaming.
just simulate the murders in your mind. try acting out the vicious murders of 2 people with a knife,and keep it quiet.
there is your big hole in the OJ did it theory.
someone planted evidence.
ferman sure left town in a hurry after the trial.
he also purgered himself.
also the blood on the socks was supposed to have come from the inside out. the police had every oppurtunity to set the entire thing up.
there's your third person theory.
i vote for the ones that set up the evidence,and wouldn't look at anyone else.. and for that matter,why didn't they persue other suspects after the
not guilty verdict?
i'm sorry,but i followed this trial almost every day,read as much as i could.
i just could never figure out how he would have done it.
as for the book? he needed mney badly after the trial because of the civil verdict for the goldman's. no double jeoprody,so why not tease the
public and make a few bucks? that move wasn't that stupid.
[edit on 13-6-2009 by Spectre0o0]