Why the death penalty must be abolished, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 01:04 AM by GuiltyByDesign
reply to post by Tentickles



Have you seen the recent rise on ammunition taxes? They won't be indiscriminately firing into anything... it's too expensive.

Chemical weapons, white phosphorous, and napalm, however... extremely cheap and always effective.

However... the death penalty is a tricky subject. As a human being and Christian, I'd love to be able to forgive and forget.

As a rational man, however, sometimes that is impossible to do.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 01:15 AM by rapinbatsisaltherage
I get where you’re coming from, I use to be adamantly against the death penalty. If you look at the results of nations not having the death penalty you’ll find that many have less people in jail and have lower crime rates and lower murder rates. When it comes to lower murder rates this is often true in the US as well. It’s puzzling how people are so quick to want to brutalize others without realizing that a lack of brutality usually gets more results. This was one reason for me supporting abolishing the death penalty. Another was witnessing how many innocent people ended up on death row.

I’ve only recently changed my position. Do the things I stated above still stand? Yes, but I’ve realized with the technology they have today that the chances of convicting innocent people have gone way down. And the number of actual executions that have taken place in this country in contrast to the number of murders is very slim. I’ve realized that comparing execution to murder is like comparing legal imprisonment to kidnapping or holding someone hostage. I’ve realized that guards working for our prison system don’t need to be putting their lives at risk everyday to watch over non-criminally insane scumbags who raped and killed children or who decided to commit the worst kind of arson. I’m not assuming that all prison guards are the best of people, I’ve heard stories that I wish were deceiving my ears, but generally these are people who signed up to do one of the sh#ttiest jobs in the world, looking after the often violent and sociopathic muck of society and these people do get injured and killed on the job. People will tell you murderers are least likely to go back to committing the same crime, but what about those who continue wanting to kill people? What is to stop people like that from continuing to try to hurt others if they can never be sentenced to death? If you can only have life in prison then what does anyone within that environment have to lose? Why not attack guards or fellow inmates you can’t stand if you’re already going to be in prison for life?

With the death penalty there are just too many thoughts about the murderers and the murdered that kept me up at night, I just couldn’t live with being against the death penalty no matter what the circumstances are. I still understand and respect those who see things differently.

I still don’t think juveniles should be sentenced to death, even if an underage person is tried as an adult. You can’t just go around deciding that young people can make that kind of decision knowing the consequences and then turn around and make other laws that say they aren’t in the right mind to consent to a world of other things while knowing the consequences of their actions, that’s a complete contradiction within the system.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 02:18 AM by Demandred
reply to post by Donnie Darko



nothing they can ever do will repay for the suffering they have caused, however to murder them would make us just as bad as they are and at least incarcerated they have been removed from society and unable to cause more suffering on others.

murder is murder ... wether its state sanctioned or 2 people



reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 02:20 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



nothing they can ever do will repay for the suffering they have caused, however to murder them would make us just as bad as they are and at least incarcerated they have been removed from society and unable to cause more suffering on others.

murder is murder ... wether its state sanctioned or 2 people


Exactly. I just meant I thought you opposed DP because it isn't cruel enough


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 02:27 AM by Demandred
reply to post by Donnie Darko



the DP isnt cruel enough, as i said earlier dying is the easiest way out, however i dont deny that people (some) can change i dont know if you know much about what happened in Aus but some one like Martin bryant hes not mentally stable enough to be released and Ivan Milat should never be released because hes an evil person, but somone who accidentally kills someone in the heat of the moment should maybe be given the oportunity to redeem them selves ... maybe... depends on the circumstances...


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 02:29 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



the DP isnt cruel enough, as i said earlier dying is the easiest way out, however i dont deny that people (some) can change i dont know if you know much about what happened in Aus but some one like Martin bryant hes not mentally stable enough to be released and Ivan Milat should never be released because hes an evil person, but somone who accidentally kills someone in the heat of the moment should maybe be given the oportunity to redeem them selves ... maybe... depends on the circumstances...


Interesting.

But why must we think in "eye for an eye" terms at all?

That's what's holding us back.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 8 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags