Just in the news:
Many lawmakers use tax dollars to travel on private planes
See - THAT is a REAL injustice. That is way more despicable than paying money to spare a brutal criminal's life.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko
Um, that is not the whole of my argument and not the only reason I believe that those that show themselves to be a danger must be removed completely.
[edit on 12-6-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
Originally posted by KEMIK
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko
Um, that is not the whole of my argument and not the only reason I believe that those that show themselves to be a danger must be removed completely.
[edit on 12-6-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
It's still a tough one. I've interviewed many of the accused family members. And I will say that many of them were very sincere, wonderful individuals. I can't imagine having to say to them, "sorry, we are going to kill your child".
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko
It is an injustice amongst many. But do you honestly think a government could remain afloat in a capitalistic set up paying for the things you propose tacking onto the budget?
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by KEMIK
Yea, as I said, the solution sucks......... But so does reality a good part of the time.
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to post by Donnie Darko
Believe me, I would be out there trying to kill that person.
So what does that make me? Human, I suppose.

Originally posted by spellbound
reply to post by Donnie Darko
Unfortunately, humans are tribal.
Firstly, they protect their family; secondly they protect their tribe, but they are too dumb to protect their race.
Humans may be brilliant at some things, but they are so dumb that they have not realised that if you do not protect your own race, the whole race is wiped out.
This is a simple equation that young children could understand.
I am off topic here, but then again, maybe I am on topic.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by KEMIK
I think it should be somewhat expanded and somewhat contracted. More readily used but with the stipulation that the evidence is irrefutable, for a somewhat weak example the person was caught at the scene with weapon in hand as he or she was doing it by multiple people.