Why the death penalty must be abolished, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:19 AM by KEMIK
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



Um, that is not the whole of my argument and not the only reason I believe that those that show themselves to be a danger must be removed completely.

[edit on 12-6-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


It's still a tough one. I've interviewed many of the accused family members. And I will say that many of them were very sincere, wonderful individuals. I can't imagine having to say to them, "sorry, we are going to kill your child".


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:21 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by KEMIK
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



Um, that is not the whole of my argument and not the only reason I believe that those that show themselves to be a danger must be removed completely.

[edit on 12-6-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


It's still a tough one. I've interviewed many of the accused family members. And I will say that many of them were very sincere, wonderful individuals. I can't imagine having to say to them, "sorry, we are going to kill your child".


That's the other thing. You are still killing a loved one of somebody. I mean somebody probably loves them. It is still tragic.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:22 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko



It is an injustice amongst many. But do you honestly think a government could remain afloat in a capitalistic set up paying for the things you propose tacking onto the budget?


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:25 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by KEMIK



Yea, as I said, the solution sucks......... But so does reality a good part of the time.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:25 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



It is an injustice amongst many. But do you honestly think a government could remain afloat in a capitalistic set up paying for the things you propose tacking onto the budget?


Yes I do.

Just leave the damn potheads alone, stop wasting money in pointless wars, and stop making prison an industry and we could easily afford it.



reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:26 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by KEMIK



Yea, as I said, the solution sucks......... But so does reality a good part of the time.


Now that my friend, I can agree on.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:27 AM by spellbound
reply to post by Donnie Darko



Believe me, I would be out there trying to kill that person.

So what does that make me? Human, I suppose.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:28 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko



*chuckles* In a simplistic world perhaps that would work. This one, highly doubtful.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:29 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



Believe me, I would be out there trying to kill that person.

So what does that make me? Human, I suppose.


Yup, I suppose humans aren't designed for forgiveness.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:32 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Donnie Darko



It's not about forgiveness, just like it's not about revenge. At least not the point I am arguing.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:38 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by KEMIK



I think it should be somewhat expanded and somewhat contracted. More readily used and definantly quicker but with the stipulation that the evidence is irrefutable, for a somewhat weak example the person was caught at the scene with weapon in hand as he or she was doing it by multiple people.

[edit on 12-6-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]



reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:38 AM by spellbound
reply to post by Donnie Darko



Unfortunately, humans are tribal.

Firstly, they protect their family; secondly they protect their tribe, but they are too dumb to protect their race.

Humans may be brilliant at some things, but they are so dumb that they have not realised that if you do not protect your own race, the whole race is wiped out.

This is a simple equation that young children could understand.

I am off topic here, but then again, maybe I am on topic.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:42 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by spellbound
reply to
post by Donnie Darko



Unfortunately, humans are tribal.

Firstly, they protect their family; secondly they protect their tribe, but they are too dumb to protect their race.

Humans may be brilliant at some things, but they are so dumb that they have not realised that if you do not protect your own race, the whole race is wiped out.

This is a simple equation that young children could understand.

I am off topic here, but then again, maybe I am on topic.


I guess that's what makes me different from other people. I'm autistic (slightly), so I see things like a Vulcan might, ie, logical.

I do love my family first and foremost, but I also realize other people's families are in the big picture, just as valuable as mine. So for that reason, I'm not tribal like most people, does that make sense?

I'm not saying I'm an angel, actually I can be a bit apathetic sometimes, but that's why I don't "get" the death penalty. Most people who support the death penalty do so because they know they would if it happened to a member of their family (especially their child).

I'm not sure the death penalty necessary even helps victims' families - I've heard the process is extremely painful. Plus blood doesn't make a good memorial for someone imo. I actually hate the idea of my parents putting my killer to death for what they did to me.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:45 AM by KEMIK
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by KEMIK



I think it should be somewhat expanded and somewhat contracted. More readily used but with the stipulation that the evidence is irrefutable, for a somewhat weak example the person was caught at the scene with weapon in hand as he or she was doing it by multiple people.


The only problem is, the forensic field is not completely developed. I originally began my college career in forensic science. Think about the evolution of forensic science. It was crude then. It is crude now, if you believe that there are many more break throughs to come.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:47 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by KEMIK



Which is why I say only in cases in which the evidence is irrefutable. There are such cases.


reply posted on 12-6-2009 @ 03:49 AM by Donnie Darko
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to
post by KEMIK



Which is why I say only in cases in which the evidence is irrefutable. There are such cases.


So would ya spare OJ?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 187 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 103 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 72 replies