WHO Declaration of Swine Flu Pandemic Appears Imminent, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:19 AM by Adrifter
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984





In fairness however would we prefer an over or under reaction when dealing with potentially dangerous pathogens?



I really used to like it when people ignored me, or just stared or did not star if they agreed or disliked what I wrote. Instead of questioning me.

I would prefer a mature and intelligent reaction. The media hyper sensationalized the story, the VP was on the news rambling on about how he would avoid air travel or being outside. Yes I understand it was his opinion, yet he was on the news as the Vice president of the United states, the 2nd in command to the free world saying he would not recommend going outside or whatever. Yes that alarmed me a lil, got me thinking they knew something I did not.

You really did not need to make yourself any clearer, I agreed and understood.

I enjoy coming here and learning about things by reading people's contributions, I don't ENJOY communicating with other Authors over my opinions so they can point out flaws or things they think are flaws. I just want to be able to contribute to the board when I feel like it or am compelled to do so, to help others expand on their own beliefs or help people understand further. Sometimes I might sound like a complete idiot, I am having a bad day, or whatever. Yet sometimes perhaps I have a fragment of info that makes sense to you, and you can apply it to what you think. Who knows maybe you'll write a book or whatever. I don't mind answering questions, but questions are better off asked via U2U, or whatever.

no disrespect


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:00 AM by tarifa37
This is well OTT,'Swine flu' cruise ship blocked from Caribbean ports
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Does this mean from now on anybody on a cruise ship who shows signs of the flu can effectively stop their boat from docking.This is what Australia did and it still got in.



Fears that another cruise ship has been struck by swine flu are mounting after it was blocked from entering two ports this week.

Royal Caribbean's Adventure of the Seas is making a seven-night tour of the Southern Caribbean and was this week denied entry at St Lucia and Antigua.
Royal Caribbean's 'Adventure of the Seas' cruise ship

Suspected: Royal Caribbean's 'Adventure of the Seas'

Two members of the crew and one passenger have reportedly displayed flu-like symptoms.

Chief executive officer for the Antigua and Barbuda Tourism Authority Colin James told cruise website CruiseCritic.co.uk that despite three people being isolated and treated in Barbados, the ship was stopped from visiting St Lucia.

The website reported: 'Permission to dock in Antigua was also denied, based on advice from Antigua's chief medical officer and minister of health.'

Mr James added that the cases were confirmed as the H1N1 virus but a Royal Caribbean spokeswoman said earlier this week that full lab results were not yet available.

This is not the first time Royal Caribbean has been affected by swine flu - crew members were struck down with the virus on Serenade of the Seas in May.

And the news comes after the cruise operator said that the recent swine flu outbreak had hit its earnings.

'The flu outbreak had a short, but highly disruptive impact to our operations,' Chairman and Chief Executive Richard D. Fain said in a statement.

The Miami-based company said the virus led Royal Caribbean International's ships to steer clear of Mexican ports.

It also cancelled the launch of Pullmantur's Pacific Dream, which targets Mexican nationals.

Royal Caribbean, which has 37 ships in service and six being built, said its Celebrity cruises were not impacted by the virus.

'Fortunately, our vessels are quickly returning to their original itineraries, but the impact from the publicity surrounding the H1N1 virus on our Mexican business is frustrating,' Mr Fain said.

The World Health Organization says the disease has reached 66 countries and infected more than 19,000 people. It has caused 117 deaths, mostly in Mexico.

Speculation was also growing today that world health bosses could declare the swine flu outbreak the first global flu pandemic for more than 40 years.



reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:05 AM by ImaginaryReality1984
reply to post by Adrifter



It's a discussion board, when you post people reply and question, that is how it is. If you don't like it then ignore the responses or don't post. Pretty simple really.

Anyway this swine flu has so far been blown out of proportion. Let's hope it has run it's course before the winter comes in the nothern hemisphere though.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:54 AM by Adrifter
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984





It's a discussion board, when you post people reply and question, that is how it is. If you don't like it then ignore the responses or don't post. Pretty simple really.


A message board is in no shape or form designed for debates. A message board is not a classroom. If anything it is a chalkboard.... I see more people get mad and get off topic over questions, to a reply or just a contribution to the topic posted. it is a distraction I suppose, especially when one is thinking or pondering further, only to be interrupted by a question, on a message board. Also I am sure your not to sure of my point of view either. Its ok we are on a message board, I don't expect my words I write down, to substitute my inflection in my voice, or my body language in this presentation.

I'll take your advice. Yes Its going to be a pandemic, but I don't think we have much to worry about on a health issue. More concerned on the political side of it.




[edit on 11-6-2009 by Adrifter]


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:03 AM by phoenixs1
reply to post by Adrifter



You might want to watch Biden's comments again....he never said anything about not going outside. I am sorry he "alarmed you a lil". He didn't have that effect on me at all, but I suppose it's people like you that they are worrying about when they express concern about people being panicked or alarmed.

Given the large number of young people being hospitalised and dying from this flu, I think most anyone who loves their children would think twice before taking unnecessary chances at catching this thing and I think Biden was just speaking the truth.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:07 AM by phoenixs1
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984



What part of this do you think has "been blown out of proportion"? All the facts, figures and links you need are on this thread, and they clearly show that quite the opposite has happened. Have you bothered to look at the hospitalization stats and seen how different they are to all previous years recorded? A "flu" has never caused this many hospitalizations in June, or at least not as far back as the records go, which if you look at NY, show that flu is down to virtually nil by the end of May each year.....not 1/2 mill. infected and hundreds on ventilators.



[edit on 11-6-2009 by phoenixs1]


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:10 AM by Adrifter
reply to post by phoenixs1



*sigh*


And his statements were mature and intelligent and well thought out to state on the news? Sorry I don't quite remember his exact words. Yet his presentation was pretty convincing to stay away from public transportion or populated area's.

this is exactly what I mean about message boards. It is hard to communicate what you mean..



reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:17 AM by phoenixs1
reply to post by Adrifter



I had no problem with what he said. I live in Australia where they have cancelled sporting matches etc, and I think that is a mature and intelligent thing to do.

Many people are catching this from air travel and being in crowded public places, and no doubt on public transport. Again, I have no problem with what Biden said.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:34 AM by Adrifter
reply to post by phoenixs1



I have no problem on what he said, I just do not think it is mature and intelligent to tell people not to travel or do business as usual for a flu that really is no different then the flu. It would be one thing if people who caught this were dieing at a high rate or whatever. I don't want to catch this flu, but I am not going to stop living in order to think I am safe from getting sick. The fact is this is not killing like a Ebola virus or something, people get sick and pretty much recover from it. I don't think its appropriate for you to tell me to go back over biden's quotes in order to understand better or understand something specifically he said. I got his message. I got your's I respect it and I am not Personally advising you to do further research. This is not a good place for debates is all I am saying.

Oh and it is no longer imminent level 6 is here.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:52 AM by phoenixs1
reply to post by Adrifter



With all due respect, Biden never told people not to travel etc...he merely said that's what he was telling his own family. I'm sure he's not the only loving parent wanting to ensure his children stay alive and healthy.

Nobody has asked you to stop living! You can take as many chances as you want. and you can put your kids in situations where they will likely catch it if you choose (would obviously not be my choice!). We all have that choice, at least at this stage.

But if you get it, please stay home, rather than go out and infect others because you are convinced the experts are wrong and it's no big deal. There are hundreds of children and young adults on ventilators from this all over America, and kids with mild illnesses like asthma dying from it. I do hope you'll be responsible in this regard, even if you are "skeptical".


reply posted on 13-6-2009 @ 09:56 AM by wonderworld
reply to post by Curious and Concerned



That's a good question about immunity. I wont get too worked up over this until I see a large percentage of the population dying off or getting near fatal flu symptoms.

What I'm wondering is if this will skip the Fall flu season and come back strong next summer or perhaps the fall of 2010?

It shouldnt be like 1918, since we have antibiotics for secondary infections; although history has a way of correcting over populaltion. That part is concerning.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 11 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 11 days ago with 14 member flags
Deadly new superbug heading for Britain!
  Posted 1 days ago with 9 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags