It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
That depends on how far away from the camera they are, they are close when compared to the tether.
they are close when compared to the tether.
Originally posted by easynow
the object they zoom in on is FAR AWAY and makes the notched appearance of the object
that means the objects in the tether video could also very well be far away.
Originally posted by easynow
you have your theory's and i have mine
That's right, I can not prove it, in the same way that nobody can prove that those objects were ice crystals or huge ships invisible from Earth, for that we would need more data than what we have.
Originally posted by easynow
that's just your opinion and you cannot prove it
Out of focus works both ways.
the object they zoom in on is FAR AWAY and makes the notched appearance of the object
That is another problem, we do not really know if the tether was really focused. As they change the focus we can assume (but only that) that they tried a shorter and a longer focus, and this was the best they got for the tether.
that means the objects in the tether video could also very well be far away.
That's right, I can not prove it
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by easynow
Yes.
That's the problem with this case, we can look, we can discuss it, we can try to use filters and make experiments but after 1027 replies and 52 pages we know the same about those images, even if we may have got more knowledge about other things (I know I have).
Originally posted by ArMaP
That's the problem with this case, we can look, we can discuss it, we can try to use filters and make experiments but after 1027 replies and 52 pages we know the same about those images, even if we may have got more knowledge about other things (I know I have).
religious hate
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by depthoffield[/url]
religious hate
no don't bring religion into the discussion...
Originally posted by easynow
no really if you have never seen a real ufo then you will look for the mundane explanation. for people that have seen them, they know to look for ufo's because they do exist.
Originally posted by easynow
are there some ufo's in this tether video mixed in with debri that was purposely released to cloud the FOV ?
you might not think so, but i do
I also believe alien ships or maybe other unknown phenomenon exist
as for "UFO" as what definition exactly means
So you say there are debris in the image? I thought there are only critters and alien ships attracted by the tether
So debris in space looks like critters/allien ships, or viceversa, so the "alleged" obfuscating method is a good solution? Wow...
can't say which one which is?
Originally posted by secretnasaman
They do this without any use of all the non-downloaded video NASA also shoots & brings back to Earth, on videotapes & multiple types of film. We need more than words. We need to see the still "embargoed" video of the tether 100 miles away. If there were not UFOs, then show these other videos taken after the tether breaks.