It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zuzubar
Are you saying they are dying in vain?
Originally posted by Zuzubar
You guys have to have respect for the troops in Iraq. I respect them for what they are doing. Are you saying they are dying in vain? They most certainly do not
Originally posted by Zuzubar
Actually we have found WMD'S in iraq. I can't stand people who think we should leave terrorists alone with nuclear weapons. There is a huge possibility of having another terrorist attack in AMERICA or anyone else. We want to prevent that. We are not war-mongerers either. The terrorists are.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by Satyr
I know what he's saying. I wouldn't put myself in that position in the first place. I know exactly what would happen. No, I won't do something I'm ordered to, if I don't agree with it. Breaking the law is more honorable than going against your own principles. You don't agree?
In the military, so long as it is lawful, you have to obey an order that a superior gives you. In is in the oath of enlistment.
That is one of the main reasons why being in the military is not for everyone. Not everyone can follow orders.
Yes (Master) SIR! I'll do anything you say SIR! Get down on my knees SIR?! OK! Flop like a fish SIR?! OK! Shoot them Iraqis? Yes SIR!
Originally posted by Colonel
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE OF TREATIES IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Look! What did I say?
You said that treaties can only exsist between nation states, I showed that is not the case.
You do this crap all the time and I don't know why you just don't make a thread to come after me like you want to.
If by "do this crap all the time," you mean refuting you. Then yes, I am guilty as charged. This would not be the case if you stopped posting false or misleading information.
I am not trying to come after you, just trying to deny ignorance here. Your statements scream for someone to rebutt them. In this case it was me who got to do the rebuttal.
Originally posted by Zuzubar
The news didn't make a big deal about it but it was rumored that WMD'S were found in Iraq. They even found pictures.
Originally posted by Colonel
They were "found" or planted. Look, if Saddam really had WMDs, don't you think he would have used them on our troops rather than be left in ruin like he is now?
Originally posted by Zuzubar
You guys have to have respect for the troops in Iraq. I respect them for what they are doing. Are you saying they are dying in vain? They most certainly do not
Staff Sgt. Camilo Mejia, a 28-year-old native of Nicaragua, turned himself in to military authorities at Hanscom Air Force Base, outside of Boston, on March 15, seeking conscientious objector status. He spent five months on the run after serving in Iraq from April 2003 until last October, when he came home on two-week�s leave and refused to return for redeployment October 16. Among his reasons for going AWOL, he said, were his witnessing of incidents in which Iraqi civilians were killed by US troops.
Mejia is one of about 7,500 troops who fail to return to their units each year from a force of about 1.4 million. There have been about 600 soldiers who have gone AWOL from obligations in Iraq in particular, but he is believed to be the first to give himself up. Hours before handing himself over, Mejia gave a press conference at the Peace Abbey in Sherborn, Massachusetts.
He issued a statement to the press, in which he declared:
�I�m saying no to war. I went to Iraq�I was an instrument of violence�and now I�ve decided to be an instrument for peace. My conscience�I could not continue to do the things that I was doing in Iraq. This war, I�m completely against it because it�s an oil-motivated war. I don�t think that any soldier who ever signed to be in the military, signed to go halfway across the world to invade and occupy a nation to take their oil or any other natural resource.... We were all lied to when we were told that we were looking for weapons of mass destruction or we were going to fight terrorism.�
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by Colonel
They were "found" or planted. Look, if Saddam really had WMDs, don't you think he would have used them on our troops rather than be left in ruin like he is now?
No you idiot. We put out the policy long before hostilities began.
If Iraq used WMDs on use then we would retaliate with nuclear weapons. That was all the way back during Desert Shield and the policy has remained in place since then. Saddam knew that a nuke could reach him no matter how deep the bunker (or spider hole) was.
Originally posted by Colonel
Don't talk to me, moron. You just troll for a fight with me. If you want one, like I said, make a thread and call me out. If not, don't bother me. You detract form the topic of the threads whenever you post.
Originally posted by Zuzubar
Iraq will use them EVENTUALLY and that's why we have to disarm them