It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BeautifulLife
How can you know he is a lier?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
The Army didn't let them have it because they never recovered it. The Battle of Los Angeles is simply a case of war nerves.
Originally posted by yeti101
How does a giant alien spaceship you think is in the photo resemble a group of planes?
Originally posted by Elepheagle
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
The Army didn't let them have it because they never recovered it. The Battle of Los Angeles is simply a case of war nerves.
They never shot anything down during the Battle of L.A., though they tried, and tried pretty damn hard. War nerves? Come on. One of the worst explanations I've heard to date. Makes our military commanders look like a bunch of idiots and fools.
The respondent after mentioned that it wasn't necessarily the Battle of L.A. that he was referring to here. That's correct. He wasn't referring to the Battle of L.A., but to a separate incident. I think that much is obvious.
Originally posted by ZeroGhost
National polls by media, and others suggest a majority believe. Means nothing until an objective study is done. Your data is also inadmissible and in the same category too you understand.
Originally posted by SchadenAs a percentage, more people with advanced degrees believe in aliens, than people with only high school or lower.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
But there is no proof that UFOs are off-worldly in origin. It may look like it, and we may be made to think so...but like one poster said "Show me the money!"
Have we ever seen a full analysis of that 'enhanced' LA raid photo? If so, I'd sure like to see it.
Originally posted by Thebudweiserstuntman
reply to post by atlasastro
Thanks for that, it does indeed put the original quote in context. Interestingly they mention that a great bulkof these discs found turned out to be pranks, and not allof them found turned out to be pranks.
Originally posted by SchadenThere is ample evidence to conclude some UFOs have an alien origin.
I suggest you read Friedman's book, Flying Saucers and Science.
BTW the guy who did the Battle of LA photo analysis, is one of the preeminent UFO photographic experts, a PhD Navy physicist with a speciality in optics and lasers. It's not just some amateur screwing around in photoshop.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
I'm a military historian, I know that soldiers are only human. They were afraid of an invasion of West Coast. They overreacted. Nothing more. Remember, during Operation Husky we would shoot down a bunch of "enemy" C-47s.
Originally posted by Schaden
Originally posted by ZeroGhost
National polls by media, and others suggest a majority believe. Means nothing until an objective study is done. Your data is also inadmissible and in the same category too you understand.
Also there is a positive correlation between education and the ET hypothesis for UFOs.
As a percentage, more people with advanced degrees believe in aliens, than people with only high school or lower.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
reply to post by ZeroGhost
"In reference to the Los Angeles incident, witnesses clearly could hear the distinctive "pings" and impacts from the AA on the object. Photographic evidence suggest a clear object, not a cloud or balloon. But that is not for this specific threads reference we found."
From what distance would they be hearing those "pings". Were the aliens flying "gongs"?
A "clear object"? Really? As in "you can't see it, but I know it's there, so trust me"?