It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SecretGoldfish
yup, no doubt.
but anything like this? one hour, single target, multiple batteries, 1-2K rounds, radar contact . . ?
where else did such an engagement occur?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
So, I'm the irrational one? Really? I'm a skeptic, so I doubt that. Of course, if you had evidence you'd have already trotted it out. But the dog ate it, right?
Originally posted by Schaden
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
So, I'm the irrational one? Really? I'm a skeptic, so I doubt that. Of course, if you had evidence you'd have already trotted it out. But the dog ate it, right?
You're not a skeptic, you're a debunker. A skeptic takes the neutral position and weighs the evidence. A debunker concludes a priori alien visitation to this planet is bunk. [edit on 13-5-2009 by Schaden]
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
reply to post by Gawdzilla
So Gawdzilla, you're basically saying everyone of thes top-brass officials scientists, astronauts, CIA officials are lying about UFO's? Correct?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Should have put "paraphrased" there. It seems I have to be very, very, very explicit to avoid misunderstanding here. Not surprising.
Originally posted by Thebudweiserstuntman
"We must insist upon full access to disks recovered. For instance, in the LA case the Army grabbed it and would not let us have it for cursory examination."
also Nixon;
Richard Nixon, US President from 1969 to 1974: "I'm not at liberty to discuss the government's knowledge of extraterrestrial UFO's at this time. I am still personally being briefed on the subject."
Originally posted by Thebudweiserstuntman
reply to post by Gawdzilla
He mentioned the government's 'knowledge' of the subject and did however say he was still being briefed on the subject, which, to me would suggest that they have information to 'brief' him with...
edit - spelling
[edit on 13-5-2009 by Thebudweiserstuntman]