It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NASCARUFOs
reply to post by FlySolo
The story i got from a television program in Turkey (translated) is that he is a prison/military gaurd that has a job on the beach front and all of this is taking place over the ocean. One of the videos has been translated on U-TUBE and he explains how it looks so close up. He has a telescoping lens or telescopic whatever. He can zoom in tremendous amounts while recording.
Originally posted by gyoung88
reply to post by cmazzagatti
That's definitely impressive. Can't help but feeling we're on the brink of mass contact. If a ship offered to take you away from here, would you go?
Pre-evalutaion report? What the heck does that mean?
Subject: Image Pre-evaluation Report
ATV Channel - Programme Editor
What? January 31, 2008?
On January 31, 2008, a MiniDV format video cassette holding 35 minutes of footage was brought over to “TUBITAK” The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey’s (a Scientific Institution owned by the state that is highly reliable and influential) National Observatory (TUG) by Mr.Tolga Ozdeniz, the Editor of “Reporter” that has been aired on ATV Channel. The footage on the cassette was said to have been recorded by a Canon GL1 MiniDV digital camera on a beach of a holiday village in Kumburgaz/Istanbul by an amateur.
"Optical clarification effects"? Some sort of manipulation? No matter, it seems they disregarded them.
The images were examined by TUG- National Observatory Image Processing Unit. Because, it would take quite a long time to analyze all of the images, only randomly selected parts were pre-examined. During this process, emphasis was not placed on images produced by optical clarification effects which a number of point light sources generated.
I'm confused. The dates I see on the video are 2008. It seems we are talking about different tapes after all but, on we go.
The date on the video indicates that the recordings were made during the summer of 2007
I wonder what the rest of the statement might be. Also the phrase used, "studio re-created images or models" could be read as only ruling out studio work. I never considered the possibility of this being done in a studio. If it is actually ruling out the use of a model altogether, I would be curious to know more about how they reached that conclusion.
The footage images of the object which visibly have a certain configuration are not computer animations, special video effects or studio re-created images or models. The footage is genuine…
Well, since we're not even talking about the same year, I guess the time of day doesn't really matter either.
The first observation made from the footage is that some of the images were recorded in nighttime sky at a certain altitude from the horizon. The footage also covers images of moon in some parts which proves that the video was shot in nighttime and open air. But, the fact that digital date display’s showing AM in certain frames and PM in others, raises suspicion about the validity of the time in which the recordings were made
The same applies to "our" video. Might I add that no absolute motion can be determined either.
Since in some parts, there is no other object that can be featured as a reference in the close-up frames and no observable differences were found on background examination, the actual location, distance, dimensions and nature of the objects could not have been determined.
Why does different dates imply different objects? Also, as I said, there doesn't seem to be any way to determine any absolute motion.
Through the examination of shootings of multiple dates, it’s a strong possibility that 2-3 different objects were captured. However, it’s difficult to determine whether the objects are moving or not. Their movement is slow even if they do so.
Again, an incomplete statement. Perhaps the the complete statement furnishes more information but one has to wonder. Without knowing the size or location of the object there is really no way to determine it but, again judging from the video which we are talking about, it would seem to be a fairly strong light source. The light also seems to be from a point source.
The reflections of light on the objects are sometimes caused by moon which was in a convenient location at that time, and sometimes produced by some other sources of light…
Can't really comment. No August 10th "shooting".
The light reflection from the left side of the object which is seen on August 10th shootings is not produced by the moon. At that time, the moon was in a phase that was pretty close to the “new moon” phase and located approximately at a 10 degrees proximity/angle to the horizon. Moreover, the image processing analysis conducted on some part of the footage revealed that the center of the object has the same density as its background, namely is of a transparent nature.
Originally posted by RiotComing
Haha, the debunking efforts have been pitiful so far! They're grasping at straws! It's the ISS!!! The clock is 10 minutes fast!! LOL
This one is going to stump the most diehard dyed-in-the-wool pseudoskeptics in here. And like Diplomat said a couple of pages back, the creatures remind me very much of the ET in the infamous 'Alien Interview' video - which I too believe to be real. Oh the shame!! Oh the humanity!!
Originally posted by ChemBreather
reply to post by Reading
I think this footage was examined for 10 days by alot of experts saying it was authentic....