AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


EXCLUSIVE: Satellite Photo of North Korean Train Explosion Faked


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 24-4-2004 @ 12:59 PM by SE7EN


Just seen some pictures on tv that have been released showing half a house blown up plus a massive crater

North Korea station 'obliterated'

The blast left a huge crater

BBC
BBC in pictures

Foreign aid workers who were allowed to visit the site of Thursday's train blast in North Korea say they found a scene of utter devastation.
They say the area around the station at Ryongchon is totally obliterated and damage extends for four kilometres.

It was feared hundreds had died but the Red Cross says it does not expect the official figure of 154, which includes many children, to increase much.

By the looks of the blast area there seems to be alot of space in the surrounding on the picture above then compare it to the outher photos taken by the satelite bit fishy huh?

[Edited on 24-4-2004 by SE7EN]

[Edited on 24-4-2004 by SE7EN]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-4-2004 @ 07:09 PM by xundf


this is pretty unnerving. first it was petroleum and gas, then dynamite, now ive also heard that it was 2 cars, one carrying fuel oil and one carrying ammonium nitrate fertilizer. how convenient, a ready made bomb on wheels, that would be much larger than the one used in ok city. there are also rumors in seol about the circumstances. see news.independent.co.uk...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-4-2004 @ 08:49 PM by MatthewR1985


Originally posted by Banshee
Originally posted by Banshee
I need to look closer at the streets. There's no way I can make out the architecture in the "post" image.

-B.



I retract my suspicions on CBS' satelling images for the time being.
Side-by-side comparison (sorry for the ugliness, quick'n'dirty HTMLing there)

Having compared the two images from the CBS site side by side (as with the original fake images), it seems that the "post" image is taken from further out than the "pre" image. That seems to be why there's no detail in the area immediately surrounding the train station.

This looks like it could well be the first REAL satellite image from the area.

-B.


The pictures are at different magnification levels. Make them match, and the streets will line up. I don't have PS, so I really can't do anything ...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-4-2004 @ 07:22 AM by leejones

is that a hill top with plac on it ?

is that blast pic a hill top with a forest on it



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 25-4-2004 @ 07:38 AM by Hoaks

THUMBS UP! FOR BANSHEE!




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-4-2004 @ 10:01 AM by Quicksilver


doesnt it feel good that our very own banshee was the first to break this story? Congrats banshee kickin arse and takin names like usual.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-4-2004 @ 05:32 AM by Banshee


GlobalSecurity.org comes through again with some REAL pictures.
Pre- & Post-Blast comparison

The devastation is....astounding. My god.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-4-2004 @ 09:11 PM by jameo131i


What i want to know is why did the media used "fake" images if you could easily find out that they were "fake".



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>


















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.066 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]