Originally posted by EffEcTiVe_UniT
Derek im assuming that your with IIG from your signatures. This can be so easily used on you. You have more money then me/indigo/billy meier/etc.. so
you could have EASILY paid off some scientists to work with you.
Wow. You really don't know much about the Independent Investigations Group. First, it is a non-profit organization. No one is paid as a member of
the IIG. It is an all-volunteer group. Our bank account holds the incredibly massive sum of $3,000. I cannot actually afford to pay for the HD
transfers of the films, but I am willing to go into debt in order to finally have the films transferred properly. I am also willing to do this
because the IIG cannot afford to do so.
Secondly, I am the principal researcher and author of the IIG Billy Meier Report. Others in the IIG have assisted and proofread my writings, but no
one else in the IIG is actually investigating the case.
I looked at the script you had in your website about page 214 about analysing the metal sample. I have that year 2001 book and i could not find it.
The reason you could not find it on page 214 is because it is not on page 214. The IIG webpage clearly says "Pages 215 and 216 of the 2001 book And
Yet…They Fly! state the following:"
Cold fusion is how it was made. Supposively. If this was just so easy then simply make a piece of rock that would display those certain reflections or
colors. Since your an organization im sure using some of your funds can aid you in this.
Again, why would you need cold fusion to create a metal sample that consists of nothing more than silver and copper? This is fairly common to
find.
Regarding the negatives, i could not tell you as i dont know what happen. Alledgedly it was misplaced or stolen. Which keep in mind something this big
of a story (hoax or not) government officials would like to minimize any exposure.
Why would the government be interested in "minimizing any exposure" if the case is a hoax?
Regarding to the dilatosso statement about discrediting on the pictures. The documentary that lee/brit elders conducted in the 2nd part of the test
results located here. Jim himself conducted that there is clearly a difference witha model and a real ufo.
Please go listen to The Paracast and the Culture of Contact audio links. When you do you will learn that Dilettoso only examined ONE photograph and
not multiple photographs like it has been suggested.
Not only that but in this video it reveales the whole part of the metal analysis. Meaning that before Dereks clip on his site cut off it did not say
the part about the finding of the rare earth metal thulium.
There is nothing deceptive about the editing of the clip on the IIG website. It is the narrator who says "Later analysis of other fragments also
reveal small amounts of Thulium, a rare-Earth element that is difficult and costly to extract here." As you can see, the comment about Thulium is
from a narrator saying that it was found in other fragments. There is no actual coverage of this discovery. It doesn't even mention that Vogel
found it.
Derek, will you submit your photos to the same testing as what billy meier went through?
I already said that I would, but that it would be pointless to do so because the tests that were done were to determine whether there was image
manipulation or not, and there would be no evidence of manipulation discovered if the photographs were single exposures.
-Derek
