posted on Apr, 13 2009 @ 04:36 PM
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Or how about some unidentified flying objects:
Just gonna mention that if you look at the angle of the shadows on that building and their length then look at the 'Dome' of that object the objects
dome isnt casting any form of shadow across the objects 'rings' surface which would mean its an exceedingly shallow dome (or the objects been
crafted in photoshop then super imposed, ie the artist forgot the dome casting a shadow on the object itself).
Also the way the light is spread across the dome also appears to indicate its a very flat object (or at least the part of it we can see) so those
'portholes' are infact facing up not out, which would indicate vents.
Also if you look at the building structure underneath you can notice that the shadow of the structure underneath where the object is it starts further
out than where the theoretical upper corner of it would be situated under the 'object' which would mean the misplaced shadow is actually the shadow
of the structure holding what ever the object is, combined with the shadow of the building structure underneath it.
Also if you follow the shadows you can see that in the upper left of the building a half circle shadow overlapping the buildings roof (the half circle
is also partial distorted by other structures on the roof). Which would to me would be the 'objects' shadow.
From this the object is very flat, attached to the building, not domed... also logically if the object wasnt a flat disc or very short cylinder ie a
water storage barrel youd expect to see some more shadow on the roof closer to it in line with the half circle shadow, hard to pin point with words
but the lack of this extra shadow on the roof shows its either very high off the roof or more likely its a very short cylinder or a flat disc
not a UFO but interesting all the same, wonder what its purpose is... besides fooling GE'ers
EDIT:- hmm ok after taking the pic into PS and covering it in lines my little thing about the shadow not matching up with the obscured part of the
building under neath it is wrong, looks like that shadow IS coming from the exact corner of the hidden portion of the building under the
Still doesnt mean the object isnt attached to the roof by a structure of some kind. Just that what i thought might have been the shadow of said
[edit on 13-4-2009 by BigfootNZ]