reply to post by ipsedixit
What do you think the plan was, for Flt.93?
I do not believe there was a real plane or a plane crash there is no evidence that positively identifies the alleged plane, or planes, (United
Airlines Flight 93) NO RECORDS OF PROOF! Nothing, nada, zero. There shouldn’t be any secretes to hide from the public about this plane crash, if
the events happened as the FBI said they did.
No one cannot get any maintenance records on United Airlines Flight 93, or the records of the time change out parts, or even the inspections reports
on this airplane, nothing, nada. It is as if UA93 did not exist.
FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe
September 24, 2001 Posted: 3:14 PM EDT (1914 GMT)
SHANKSVILLE, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- The FBI announced Monday that its investigation of the site where a hijacked jet slammed into a field here is
complete and that 95 percent of the plane was recovered.
Evidence-gathering was halted Saturday afternoon and the pieces of United Airlines Flight 93 that had been recovered were turned over Sunday to the
airline, with the exception of the flight data recorder and the voice recorder, which are being held and analyzed by the FBI, according to FBI agent
??? WHAT THE ….??
Why would the FBI return all the wreckage over to the Airline Co so soon, it is a federal crime scene? Please take note of the date this was
The FBI said they found 95 percent of the plane wreckage *REALLY* eyewitness claim there was little to nothing to see you could not tell an airplane
Most airline crash debris are always taken to an airport hanger to be reconstructed to find out what really happened to said airplane, especially when
you have too many witness contradicting each other, saying they saw different events unfold that day.
FBI ends site work, says no bomb used
Tuesday, September 25, 2001
Recovery teams initially said that the FBI investigation could go on for up to five weeks. Instead, the FBI officially ended its investigation of the
crash scene late Saturday afternoon, 12 days after the probe began.
However, recently they refused a FOIA request to see the parts because they are not finished with the investigation.
A WALL OF SILENCE
When talking to official "off the record" many tell of a muzzle from the very top.
Evidently a wide-spread fear rules... to burn one's mouth with that topic.
Research for the Film was obstructed
When asked for information US authorities barricaded themselves.
THE MYSTERY OF UNTIED FLIGHT 93
... an enquiry at UNited Airlines results in:
The INSURANCE COMPANY of UNITED AIRLINES is in possession of the wreckage.
The manager in charge at the insurance company is in a meeting at first,
then on a three day business trip, that mutates into a multi-week intercontinal trip.
During this time he cannot be reached, neither by email nor by mobile phone -- the
(female) secretary of the biggest US airline-insurance-company pretends.
After weaks and countless phone calls finally a brief answer:
The wreckage is not in their possession. The FBI in Washington is responsible.
This looks like a cover-up every time I sense something is wrong, there is the FBI presenting the so call evidences, or making public statements and
not showing any evidences to support their claims. What has been shown as evidences I could produces it myself if I had to. (Scrap yard garbage)
from an airplane bone yard.
Nobody asked for this, but as September 11 recedes, a small Pennsylvania town finds itself guardian of an American legend
By Peter Perl
Sunday, May 12, 2002; Page W32
Miller was among the very first to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. He was stunned at how small the smoking
crater looked, he says, "like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it." Once he was able to absorb the
scene, Miller says, "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service." As
a funeral director, Miller says, he is honored and humbled to preside over what has become essentially an immense cemetery stretching far into the
scenic wooded mountain ridge. He considers it the final resting place of 40 national heroes.
I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there.
Why would a coroner make such a statement? This is an eyewitness that was there, if the OS believers want us to believe in their witness and
statements that was cherry pick to fit the FBI version, they wanted the public to believe. I choose to believe in the coroner because, I think he
know what he saw, there is no reason to think he is lying.
THE WITNESSES: At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain, saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The
FBI denies its existence.
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that
prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft --
and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are
identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the
catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a
records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling ... The government alleges that four wide-body
airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft
evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence
was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security
videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode. George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.)
Yeah, let’s not forget the SIX eye witness that saw a small military plane flying around shortly before flight 93 crashed. (Bet it was a drone) I
have notice this info was left out of all the governments’ reports I wonder why? (Maybe because it doesn’t fit what the FBI is trying to sell to
the American sheep.)
FOX News reporter: It looks like there's nothing there, except for a hole in the ground.
Photographer Chris Konicki: Ah, basically that's right. The only thing you can see from where we where, ah, was a big gouge in the earth and some
broken trees. We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but from where we could see it, there wasn't much left.
Reporter: Any large pieces of debris at all?
Konicki: Na, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.
Reporter: Smoke? Fire?
Konicki: Nothing. It was absolutely quite. It was, uh, actually very quiet. Um, nothing going on down there. No smoke. No fire. Just a couple
of people walking around. They looked like part of the NTSB crew walking around, looking at the pieces..." - FOX (09/11/01)
I do not believe a plane crash in Shanksville it is all “staged” by the FBI including the phony photos, and their paid witness.