There is no finer metaphor for “pretzel logic” than the issue of “gay rights”. The contemporary addiction to “gay” liberation is no less
dangerous or mind-altering than being addicted to heroine.
Being gay is a sexual disorder the American Psychological Association does not recognize because it drove out Division leaders and members who
recognized sexual addiction for what it is. Gay men have eight times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do, and are the prevalent reason why
3% of individuals living in Washington D.C. are infected with H.I.V – on par with AIDS crisis countries such as Kenya.
Speaking frankly, I know what goes on in the gay community having been invited to a few gay parties. The real party is in the bathroom...... blah blah
blah blah blah.........
Here is my in depth, point by point rebuttal of the article.
No. (That sure makes that easy and less time consuming).
Anyways, why was he invited to gay parties and why did he go? Quiet the popular guy it sounds like.
No conclusive evidence has ever been found for any physiological basis for being sexually deviant; i.e. NOT straight. No "gay" gene has
ever been found and most probably there won't be.
Although, there are congenital abnormalities in a few individuals with ambiguous gender it is safe to say such instances are not exceptions and has no
bearing on the sexually deviant.
They say it is nature. Observed in animals. Animals have been observed mounting another of the same gender. That is a given. But this is to establish
dominance not as a consummation of sexuality.
Much evidence exists that show gay men more similar to women than straight men in a number of experiments. Lesbians have shown in experiments to be
more similar to straight men than straight women are to straight men. Gay men have shown to have different finger lengths, different sized
proportions in the brain, different reactions to shocking stimuli (they tend to be more jumpy like women). And the list goes on.
Identical twins separated at birth for example. If one is gay, the other who had a totally different environment and no communication with the other
twin, the other twin's chances for being gay are 30%. Explain to me how that is not genetic, its proven that genes play a role.
It isn't just for dominance. Male rams (brings a new understanding of their name..) have been shown to display this homosexual behavior and the
receiving ram will actually adjust himself in order for penetration to be easier....
What it comes down to is pleasure. That is why this can't be considered a disorder or a disease, because it has to cause harm to the person for it
to be charactorized as such. And this is why as much as you and other try to differenciate straight sex and gay sex, and how one is perfectly fine
and the other sinful, evil, mentally sick, ect., what it comes down to is pleasure and enjoyment, and between gays and straights there is absolutely,
zero difference when it comes to pleasure. Each does what brings them that, in all areas of life.
Animals are driven by pleasure, including people. But what needs to be corrected isn't the actions, but the intention. No action (gay sex, straight
sex, whatever) is right or wrong.
[edit on 30-3-2009 by ghaleon12]
[edit on 30-3-2009 by ghaleon12]