Being queer is a sexual disorder

page: 1
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:36 AM
link   
www.newswithviews.com...

being queer is a sexual disorder


By David R. Usher
March 29, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

There is no finer metaphor for “pretzel logic” than the issue of “gay rights”. The contemporary addiction to “gay” liberation is no less dangerous or mind-altering than being addicted to heroine.

Being gay is a sexual disorder the American Psychological Association does not recognize because it drove out Division leaders and members who recognized sexual addiction for what it is. Gay men have eight times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do, and are the prevalent reason why 3% of individuals living in Washington D.C. are infected with H.I.V – on par with AIDS crisis countries such as Kenya.

Speaking frankly, I know what goes on in the gay community having been invited to a few gay parties. The real party is in the bathroom. The parade goes both ways all night with any number of people in there at one time. It’s a crack house for sex addicts.

We know that crack, heroine, and other mood-altering addictive substances are dangerous to individuals and inflict great costs and health risks on larger society. We do not think twice about dealing with drug and alcohol addiction at face value. That is why “crack studies” and “smoker’s rights” are not taught in schools. Accordingly, drugs are illegal. We tax the daylights out of tobacco, and some cities have even made smoking illegal in many locations.

If “drug rights” promoters filed lawsuits asking the courts to mandate the establishment of “Friends of Drug Lovers” support groups in the public schools, they would be laughed out of town.

No matter how one cuts it, schools and universities promoting queerness as an attractive lifestyle may one day find themselves being sued by those who become ill after being conscripted into this dangerous lifestyle.

The shrill defiance of gay activists has gone too far. Same-sex marriage is now out of the question. As an “economic right” advocates now demand, same-sex marriage would not build chastity into open marriages.

Same-sex marriage is a viciously sexist proposition: the stated intent of feminist strategists is to secure the right for any two women to marry each other, turning marriage into a feminist political institution having chattel control of family, children, and the levers of political power. We are not far from this day. Upon creation of Obama’s White House Council on Women and Girls, N.O.W’s president (and Alpha-lesbian) Kim Gandy proudly proclaimed “We Got the Entire Cabinet.” Obama is set to inject gay lifestyle into the military, and sign a non-binding U.N. gay rights treaty that G.W. Bush refused to sign.



We have an aids epidemic in America caused by queer activists practicing and proselytizing their addiction. The epidemic is spreading into the heterosexual community at an alarming pace, most likely enhanced by swinging lesbians.

The sexual liberation movement now controls the White House. We can expect a downpour of mandates coming from Washington in the coming years. States must act to protect themselves.



Matters of public health and states’ interest are paramount. States should quickly enact health laws making homosexuality illegal and sending those who insist on practicing it into sexual addiction recovery programs until they get well. The alternative is to end up with yet another victim group needing ongoing federal and state bailouts this country cannot afford.

© 2009 David Usher - All Rights Reserved


[SNIP]


No conclusive evidence has ever been found for any physiological basis for being sexually deviant; i.e. NOT straight. No "gay" gene has ever been found and most probably there won't be.

Although, there are congenital abnormalities in a few individuals with ambiguous gender it is safe to say such instances are not exceptions and has no bearing on the sexually deviant.

They say it is nature. Observed in animals. Animals have been observed mounting another of the same gender. That is a given. But this is to establish dominance not as a consummation of sexuality. Anyway, I'd like to see video of same sex (untrained) animals in the wild giving each other [SNIP] (not just smelling each other which animals do and which some people misconstrue). Animals are known to eat their feces, their young, each other but we don't want to go that low, do we?

Is it all psychobehavioral? Is it at its core a dysfunction, a form of dysmorphia not unlike the dynamics of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa whose sufferers see themselves as fat when, in FACT, they are very thin?

Do social factors play the biggest role in its propagation like anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa? Is its spread akin to to mass hysteria/pscychogenic illness?

www.newswithviews.com...

[edit on 30-3-2009 by reject]

Mod Edit: Removed all caps title, unnecessary quote and Sexually oriented obscenity.
Terms & Conditions Of Use – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 30-3-2009 by Gemwolf]

[edit on 30-3-2009 by reject]




posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:37 AM
link   
Is that report funded by The Watchtower ? You know, Jehovah's Witnesses? They are a strange lot.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:41 AM
link   
reply to post by pluckynoonez
 


Where did you get that from??!!

That was off the wall.


You could have found out in a second the answer to your question.

www.newswithviews.com...

[edit on 30-3-2009 by lucidclouds]



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:42 AM
link   
reply to post by pluckynoonez
 


Nowhere do I see that this has anything to do with the Watchtower or Jehovah's Witnesses. No point in dragging them into this.


+18 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:47 AM
link   
You know... normally I would hit the ALERT button for a thread as obviously idiotic as this one. So much hate, anger, and phobia all wrapped up in one post.

But your lucky... I am developing a thicker skin to be on ATS...


I wonder if my tin foil hat will block waves of stupidity?



[edit on 30-3-2009 by yankeerose]



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:49 AM
link   
shocker!!! that this comes from a religious website. i suppose liking women is a choice too. you know...in my youth one day i just all of a sudden decided that i liked girls, so i stuck with that choice...right!!


+18 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 02:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by yankeerose
You know... normally I would hit the ALERT button for a thread as obviously idiotic as this one. So much hate, anger, and phobia all wrapped up in one post.

But your lucky... I am developing a thicker skin to be on ATS...


I wonder if my tin foil hat will block waves of stupidity?
unfortunatly the stupidity shown in the OP is so condensed, that you'd need a 3 inch steel hat to even start to deflect it's dumbness.

a whole article of laughable, knee jerk religiously biggoted turd wash. But the lord loves you *flutters eye lashes*



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 03:01 AM
link   
Yes I don't know if one can truly say ALL of something is something.
Especially with gays.
They are to varied.
For some, sure it might be a sexual disorder.
For some, even a psych disorder.
But for many clearly, they are just that way.
They don't have any other symptoms of any other problems.
They are just gay.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Well I live in sin city, some of the homosexuals here are still having sex with 10 to 20 males everyday. The saunas and numerous bars are thriving, and yes on top of the fabulous "AIDs" cocktail that gives them the energy to persue their lifestyle even though they are sick with aids, they are on crack, GHB, speed xtc and viagra.

The entertainers
www.weddingfitnessphotos.com...


+11 more 
posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 03:13 AM
link   
It's been a while since I last read such an ignorant article not to mention the obvious hate speech. "David R Usher" should be locked up for crimes against humanity...


1. He tries to portray gay people as "bad guys" by comparing them to drug users?! Say what?


The contemporary addiction to “gay” liberation is no less dangerous or mind-altering than being addicted to heroine.


What a nonsensical statement. Homosexuality - just like heterosexuality - is about love and attraction. Love has been called a "drug", yes, but love makes the world go round. You cannot compare the effects of love with the effects of hard drugs.


(I know someone is going to stand up and say "not all homosexuals are into love and relationships". Well the same thing can be said about heterosexuals.)

2.

Gay men have eight times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do, and are the prevalent reason why 3% of individuals living in Washington D.C. are infected with H.I.V


Gay men have 8 times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do?! Says who? From which thumb did he suck this?

3% of individuals in the Washington DC area are infected by HIV? If Mr Usher bothered to read the article he links to, he would have noticed only 37% of the study candidates had homosexual relations... Does that mean that the other 63% are "innocent" heterosexuals?

3.

Speaking frankly, I know what goes on in the gay community having been invited to a few gay parties.

Uhuh. Perhaps he should go to a few "heterosexual" swinging parties and see if heterosexuals are really that innocent when it comes to "wild parties" and things that go on in the bathrooms?

And a job well done throwing all homosexual under one big umbrella!


4.

Same-sex marriage is a viciously sexist proposition: the stated intent of feminist strategists is to secure the right for any two women to marry each other, turning marriage into a feminist political institution having chattel control of family, children, and the levers of political power. We are not far from this day. Upon creation of Obama’s White House Council on Women and Girls, N.O.W’s president (and Alpha-lesbian) Kim Gandy proudly proclaimed “We Got the Entire Cabinet.” Obama is set to inject gay lifestyle into the military, and sign a non-binding U.N. gay rights treaty that G.W. Bush refused to sign.

I don't even know where to begin poking holes in this paragraph. If I've ever seen sexist statements. This is it. I must for once congratulate him for leaving gay men out of it for a change. This time it's the lesbians that has it in for the American lifestyle... But just for good measure let's throw a little "military" in there, even though it has nothing to do with the rest of the paragraph.

5.

We have an aids epidemic in America caused by queer activists practicing and proselytizing their addiction. The epidemic is spreading into the heterosexual community at an alarming pace, most likely enhanced by swinging lesbians.


Yep. Heterosexuals being infected by HIV. It must be those darn lesbians. The heterosexuals are way to innocent to take the blame for their own actions...

6.

Matters of public health and states’ interest are paramount. States should quickly enact health laws making homosexuality illegal and sending those who insist on practicing it into sexual addiction recovery programs until they get well.

One thing is certain. David Usher is a blithering idiot. He has not said a single thing worth pondering. Weak.

7. What the OP "reject" wanted to achieve by posting this article is also quite clear. "Being queer is a sexual disorder"...!? Where is your proof? This article? You'll have to do better than that.

I see our ATSers are wise and can see right through the pathetic excuse of an article.



[edit on 3/30/09 by Gaspode]



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 03:19 AM
link   
GAYS are GREAT - for some reason they are the most amusing/bitchy/kind/intelligent people in the universe.

Why is that, I wonder.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:04 AM
link   
This is utterly ridiculous.

Ignorance at it's finest.

Sexual disorder? People need to just get over this. Homosexuality has been part of the human race for and immeasurable amount of time. It's not going to go away.

It's not a disorder.

Or a disease.

Or a psychological problem.

It's just the simple fact that there are people out there that are different from you.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:04 AM
link   
Okay .. I'll put this delicately ..

The title says 'being queer ... ' and then the article talks about homosexuals. Those are two different things. Being a homosexual is attraction to the same sex. But queering is attraction to both men and women .. and the person doing the queering will dress as a man one day and a woman the next ... and sometimes wear faux-sexual organs that are strapped on .... etc etc.

Queering and being a homosexual are two different things - last I saw.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:08 AM
link   
I have no idea where you saw that but:


queer
(kwîr) Pronunciation Key
adj. queer·er, queer·est

1. Deviating from the expected or normal; strange: a queer situation.
2. Odd or unconventional, as in behavior; eccentric. See Synonyms at strange.
3. Of a questionable nature or character; suspicious.
4. Slang Fake; counterfeit.
5. Feeling slightly ill; queasy.
6. Offensive Slang Homosexual.
7. Usage Problem Of or relating to lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, or transgendered people.

n.

1. Offensive Slang Used as a disparaging term for a homosexual person.
2. Usage Problem A lesbian, gay male, bisexual, or transgendered person.

tr.v. queered, queer·ing, queers Slang

1. To ruin or thwart: "might try to queer the Games with anything from troop movements . . . to a bomb attack" (Newsweek).
2. To put (someone) in a bad position.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:10 AM
link   
I must say, I've never heard the word queer refered to as a bi sexual cross dresser.

It's always been a gay slur round these 'ere parts. Prehaps it's a regional language thing.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Acidtastic
I must say, I've never heard the word queer refered to as a bi sexual cross dresser.

It's always been a gay slur round these 'ere parts. Prehaps it's a regional language thing.


I've never heard the word "queering" before at all.

Queer, yes...mostly meant as an insult...but never "queering".



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by TasteTheMagick
I have no idea where you saw that ...

In my human sexuality text book for my psychology degree.


Originally posted by Acidtastic
It's always been a gay slur round these 'ere parts.

When i was a kid ... a long time ago ... it was just a nasty slang towards homosexuals. But in my college text it has 'queering' as those who are attracted to both sexes and who will 'switch' their own sex day to day, by strapping on faux-sex organs and dressing as the other sex etc etc.



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by TasteTheMagick
I have no idea where you saw that ...

In my human sexuality text book for my psychology degree.


Originally posted by Acidtastic
It's always been a gay slur round these 'ere parts.

When i was a kid ... a long time ago ... it was just a nasty slang towards homosexuals. But in my college text it has 'queering' as those who are attracted to both sexes and who will 'switch' their own sex day to day, by strapping on faux-sex organs and dressing as the other sex etc etc.

well, what can I say

you learn something new every day


(which means my days' just become free
)



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Acidtastic
I must say, I've never heard the word queer refered to as a bi sexual cross dresser.

It's always been a gay slur round these 'ere parts. Prehaps it's a regional language thing.


That's way I understand it too. The only way I can understand the way 'queering' is used above is as some practice to make someone queer (as through a symbolic use of buggery), which surely would indicate 'queer' as a noun or adjective was in use first and queering as a verb appeared later.

Also, in regard to the article in the OP. I definitely think there's something in the idea that it's self-loathing repressed homosexuals that are also the most vocal of antagonists when it comes to all things 'queer'.

How does quote go? 'The lady doth protest too much, methinks'



posted on Mar, 30 2009 @ 05:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
In my human sexuality text book for my psychology degree.


That's definitely interesting...however, the dictionary doesn't say anything about that, although it could just be that I'm looking in the wrong place.

At any rate "queering" might be what you suggested, but "being queer" normally refers to someone being gay.





new topics
top topics
 
7
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join