It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skeptic1
Can you all not see why people are upset by this?
Originally posted by andy1033
If you are on welfare, how would you afford illegal drugs?
Just how many people that get welfare, can buy that stuff when they need food, and other things.
Can there really be that big of a problem of welfare people on drugs.
Originally posted by bloodcircle[/i
Lol, yeah those scumbags should be punished for being unemployed.. How fair is it that they are living like kings while us hard working folk sacrifice our lives for them....
How do you expect people to LOOK for work, if theyre picking up your trash?
This threads an eye opener...
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
No, it isn't the fault of some people that they end up on welfare, and if they need it to support their family, wonderful. I have a problem with people who feel they are entitled to collect if for years on end, or for life.
Myth: People on Welfare Become Permanently Dependent on the Support
Fact: Movement off Welfare Rolls Is Frequent
A prevalent welfare myth is that women who received AFDC became permanently dependent on public assistance. Analyses indicate that 56 percent of AFDC support ended within 12 months, 70 percent within 24 months, and almost 85 percent within 4 years (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996). These exit rates clearly contradict the widespread myth that AFDC recipients wanted to remain on public assistance or that welfare dependency was permanent. Unfortunately, return rates were also high, with 45 percent of ex-recipients returning to AFDC within 1 year. Persons who were likely to use AFDC longer than the average time had less than 12 years of education, no recent work experience, were never married, had a child below age 3 or had three or more children, were Latina or African American, and were under age 24 (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996). These risk factors illustrate the importance of structural barriers, such as inadequate child care, racism, and lack of education.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by HunkaHunka
Just one thing to add, the moralistic view is one of the KEYS to conservatism, dont forget that. And being that the issue IS your money, this is a plan that you should be for, considering its YOURS and MY money it would be saving from being blown on either drugs, or enabling the people that abuse them
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Well, there just arent actually that many people staying on welfare for life. Thats known as "propaganda."
Notice the correlation between education and staying on the dole? Is that because they are just lazy worthless people? Or because it is hard to find and keep a job that pays a decent wage without education in this country?
Our country is currently being run into the ground by the most privileged and highly educated people in America. They are increasing your tax burden enormously. And people here want to continue to chip away at our Constitutional rights to spite people over the 1% of your tax dollars that goes to support the poor. Only some of whom are "gaming the system."
Do you not see anything wrong with that at all? I dont hear any calls for our politicians and bankers to be drug tested. Even though the way our economy has been run off the road indicates someone was driving under the influence of something.
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
I don't agree with this at all. If only 1% of people are gaming the sytem, then how is it I know of several people alone who do this?
Originally posted by skeptic1
Many jobs in this country require random drug testing, so why not welfare and state assistance recipients?