It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by depth om
By no means am I trying to impress you. It should impress upon you though, that you know no more of what another lodge is doing than what emilio estevez is doing right now.
hide ya face!
But then it wouldn't be Freemasonry. It would be something else. So saying that there was an evil Masonic lodge that acted out of sorts with the rest of Masonry would be a misnomer, because such a lodge by definition wouldn't be Masonic.
Originally posted by depth om
reply to post by Masonic Light
Perhaps there are some brothers who enjoy seclusion, they have no one to answer to, so, a possibly there is a lodge or 2000 that adhere to a don't ask don't tell policy (much like the actual neophyte recruitment program) of meeting location/time/preceding.
Originally posted by depth om
Perhaps there are some brothers who enjoy seclusion, they have no one to answer to, so, a possibly there is a lodge or 2000 that adhere to a don't ask don't tell policy (much like the actual neophyte recruitment program) of meeting location/time/preceding.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
I think that you are describing a Grand Lodge. Apparently, they are allowed to do whatever they want and still call it "Freemasonry."
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
And who "mote it be" ?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
And who "mote it be" ?
Who might who be?
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Who's to say whether a Grand Lodge is deviating from "Masonic norms" ?